The Tokyo Metropolitan Government external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests for clinics in 2023.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Rie Moriuchi, Ryouta Inaba, Miyuki Nagano, Mayuko Oda, Takayuki Shinkai, Toshihisa Noguchi, Yoshiyuki Sugishita, Itaru Nishizuka, Yoshikazu Ishii
{"title":"The Tokyo Metropolitan Government external quality assessment of SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification tests for clinics in 2023.","authors":"Rie Moriuchi, Ryouta Inaba, Miyuki Nagano, Mayuko Oda, Takayuki Shinkai, Toshihisa Noguchi, Yoshiyuki Sugishita, Itaru Nishizuka, Yoshikazu Ishii","doi":"10.7883/yoken.JJID.2024.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An external quality assessment (EQA) on nucleic acid amplification tests for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted among clinics that introduced testing instrument through the Tokyo Subsidy Program for Facilities and Equipment for Testing in COVID-19 in 2023. The survey samples consisted of sample 1 (20,000 copies/mL), sample 2 (10,000 copies/mL), and negative sample. Results were obtained through Cycle threshold (Ct) values as well as positive-negative result determinations. On-site technical support was provided to the clinics that responded incorrectly. A total of 544 clinics (589 instruments) participated, and Abbott's ID NOW <sup>TM</sup> (82.2%) was the most widely used in this survey. The qualitative test results showed high correctness rates, 95.2% for sample 1, 93.2% for sample 2, and 96.3% for negative sample. Differences in Ct values were observed among reagents and instruments. Technical support were provided to 63 clinics. It revealed that discrepancies of qualitative test were mainly due to deviations from the protocol instructions, mixing all three survey samples into one vial and errors caused by foaming. This survey was unique in that the participants were mostly end-users who were not laboratory testing specialists and mainly used point-of-care testing instruments. It is important to continue EQA to improve and maintain testing accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14608,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of infectious diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7883/yoken.JJID.2024.205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An external quality assessment (EQA) on nucleic acid amplification tests for SARS-CoV-2 was conducted among clinics that introduced testing instrument through the Tokyo Subsidy Program for Facilities and Equipment for Testing in COVID-19 in 2023. The survey samples consisted of sample 1 (20,000 copies/mL), sample 2 (10,000 copies/mL), and negative sample. Results were obtained through Cycle threshold (Ct) values as well as positive-negative result determinations. On-site technical support was provided to the clinics that responded incorrectly. A total of 544 clinics (589 instruments) participated, and Abbott's ID NOW TM (82.2%) was the most widely used in this survey. The qualitative test results showed high correctness rates, 95.2% for sample 1, 93.2% for sample 2, and 96.3% for negative sample. Differences in Ct values were observed among reagents and instruments. Technical support were provided to 63 clinics. It revealed that discrepancies of qualitative test were mainly due to deviations from the protocol instructions, mixing all three survey samples into one vial and errors caused by foaming. This survey was unique in that the participants were mostly end-users who were not laboratory testing specialists and mainly used point-of-care testing instruments. It is important to continue EQA to improve and maintain testing accuracy.

东京都政府2023年门诊SARS-CoV-2核酸扩增检测外部质量评价
对通过东京2023年新冠病毒检测设施设备补贴计划引进检测仪器的诊所进行了新冠病毒核酸扩增检测的外部质量评估。调查样本由样本1(20000份/mL)、样本2(10000份/mL)和阴性样本组成。通过循环阈值(Ct)和阳性阴性结果测定获得结果。对反应不正确的诊所提供现场技术支持。共有544家诊所(589台器械)参与了本次调查,雅培的ID NOW TM(82.2%)在本次调查中使用最为广泛。定性检验结果表明,样品1的正确率为95.2%,样品2的正确率为93.2%,阴性样品的正确率为96.3%。不同试剂和仪器Ct值存在差异。向63个诊所提供了技术支助。结果表明,定性测试的差异主要是由于偏离了方案说明,将三种调查样品混合在一个小瓶中以及起泡引起的误差。这项调查的独特之处在于,参与者大多是终端用户,他们不是实验室检测专家,主要使用即时检测仪器。继续EQA以提高和保持测试准确性是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases (JJID), an official bimonthly publication of National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, publishes papers dealing with basic research on infectious diseases relevant to humans in the fields of bacteriology, virology, mycology, parasitology, medical entomology, vaccinology, and toxinology. Pathology, immunology, biochemistry, and blood safety related to microbial pathogens are among the fields covered. Sections include: original papers, short communications, epidemiological reports, methods, laboratory and epidemiology communications, letters to the editor, and reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信