Advancing the Treatment Paradigm for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Hybrid Coronary Revascularization.

IF 1.6 Q2 SURGERY
Parth M Patel, Ryon L Arrington, Amalia Jonsson, Jane W Wei, Jose Binongo, Chandan Devireddy, William Nicholson, Wissam Jaber, Stephane Rinfret, Michael E Halkos
{"title":"Advancing the Treatment Paradigm for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Hybrid Coronary Revascularization.","authors":"Parth M Patel, Ryon L Arrington, Amalia Jonsson, Jane W Wei, Jose Binongo, Chandan Devireddy, William Nicholson, Wissam Jaber, Stephane Rinfret, Michael E Halkos","doi":"10.1177/15569845241311292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to examine the longitudinal safety and efficacy of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in a large cohort of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2009 to 2020, 561 consecutive patients (median age 64.0 years, predicted risk of mortality 1.3% ± 1.8%, 403 with 2-vessel disease and 158 with 3-vessel disease) underwent a planned HCR procedure with a robot-assisted off-pump left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending (LIMA-LAD) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-LAD vessels. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for short-term and longer-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Operative mortality and stroke occurred in 4 (0.7%) and 5 patients (0.9%), respectively. Postoperative angiography revealed LIMA patency in 415 of 425 patients (98%). Median follow-up was 4.5 years and was 93% complete. Repeat revascularization occurred in 44 patients (8%) at a median of 2.7 years. Freedom from repeat revascularization and survival at 5 years was similar between patients with 2-vessel and 3-vessel disease (<i>P</i> = 0.73 and <i>P</i> = 0.19, respectively). Completely revascularized patients had 5-year survival of 91% versus 64% for incompletely revascularized patients (hazard ratio = 3.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Age (<i>P</i> = 0.03), renal failure (<i>P</i> < 0.001), and history of myocardial infarction (<i>P</i> = 0.01) were risk factors for late adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HCR is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to conventional CABG or multivessel PCI with a low incidence of late repeat revascularization and mortality. HCR can be safely applied to carefully selected patients with either 2-vessel or 3-vessel CAD; however, incomplete revascularization may result in lower long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":13574,"journal":{"name":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"57-64"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15569845241311292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the longitudinal safety and efficacy of hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) in a large cohort of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD).

Methods: From 2009 to 2020, 561 consecutive patients (median age 64.0 years, predicted risk of mortality 1.3% ± 1.8%, 403 with 2-vessel disease and 158 with 3-vessel disease) underwent a planned HCR procedure with a robot-assisted off-pump left internal mammary artery to left anterior descending (LIMA-LAD) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of non-LAD vessels. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for short-term and longer-term outcomes.

Results: Operative mortality and stroke occurred in 4 (0.7%) and 5 patients (0.9%), respectively. Postoperative angiography revealed LIMA patency in 415 of 425 patients (98%). Median follow-up was 4.5 years and was 93% complete. Repeat revascularization occurred in 44 patients (8%) at a median of 2.7 years. Freedom from repeat revascularization and survival at 5 years was similar between patients with 2-vessel and 3-vessel disease (P = 0.73 and P = 0.19, respectively). Completely revascularized patients had 5-year survival of 91% versus 64% for incompletely revascularized patients (hazard ratio = 3.8, P < 0.001). Age (P = 0.03), renal failure (P < 0.001), and history of myocardial infarction (P = 0.01) were risk factors for late adverse events.

Conclusions: HCR is a safe and effective minimally invasive alternative to conventional CABG or multivessel PCI with a low incidence of late repeat revascularization and mortality. HCR can be safely applied to carefully selected patients with either 2-vessel or 3-vessel CAD; however, incomplete revascularization may result in lower long-term survival.

推进多支冠状动脉疾病的治疗范式:混合型冠状动脉重建术。
目的:本研究的目的是研究混合冠状动脉重建术(HCR)在多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中的纵向安全性和有效性。方法:从2009年到2020年,561例连续患者(中位年龄64.0岁,预测死亡率为1.3%±1.8%,403例为2支血管疾病,158例为3支血管疾病)接受了计划中的HCR手术,包括机器人辅助的左乳内动脉到左前降支(LIMA-LAD)冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)联合非lad血管的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)。采用多变量回归分析确定短期和长期预后的危险因素。结果:手术死亡4例(0.7%),脑卒中5例(0.9%)。术后血管造影显示425例患者中415例(98%)LIMA通畅。中位随访时间为4.5年,完成率为93%。44例(8%)患者在平均2.7年的时间内发生了重复血运重建。2支血管疾病和3支血管疾病患者的5年生存率相似(P = 0.73和P = 0.19)。完全血运重建术患者的5年生存率为91%,而不完全血运重建术患者为64%(风险比= 3.8,P < 0.001)。年龄(P = 0.03)、肾功能衰竭(P < 0.001)、心肌梗死史(P = 0.01)是发生晚期不良事件的危险因素。结论:HCR是一种安全有效的微创替代传统CABG或多支PCI的方法,晚期重复血运重建率低,死亡率低。HCR可以安全地应用于精心挑选的2支或3支CAD患者;然而,不完全的血运重建可能导致较低的长期存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery is the first journal whose main mission is to disseminate information specifically about advances in technology and techniques that lead to less invasive treatment of cardiothoracic and vascular disease. It delivers cutting edge original research, reviews, essays, case reports, and editorials from the pioneers and experts in the field of minimally invasive cardiothoracic and vascular disease, including biomedical engineers. Also included are papers presented at the annual ISMICS meeting. Official Journal of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信