Screening for dysphagia in older people: A validation study of the psychometric properties of the Danish 4 Question Test (4QT-DK)

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Sabina Mette Staal, Karl Bang Christensen, David Smithard, Albert Westergren, Dorte Melgaard
{"title":"Screening for dysphagia in older people: A validation study of the psychometric properties of the Danish 4 Question Test (4QT-DK)","authors":"Sabina Mette Staal,&nbsp;Karl Bang Christensen,&nbsp;David Smithard,&nbsp;Albert Westergren,&nbsp;Dorte Melgaard","doi":"10.1111/ggi.15050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>The four-item questionnaire test (4QT) is a simple screening measure of dysphagia for older people. A positive answer to any item indicates the need for further assessment. The 4QT is fast, simple to apply and requires no training beforehand. However, it is not translated to Danish, and the psychometric properties in an older Danish population are unknown. The aim was to translate the 4QT to Danish, determine criterion validity according to the existing measures, the Minimal Eating Observation Form-II (MEOF-II) and Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST), and determine construct and structural validity and reliability by exploring whether 4QT fits the assumptions of the Rasch model.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The 4QT was translated and back-translated. A total of 73 participants aged ≥65 years were included and screened with the 4QT-DK, and assessed using the V-VST and MEOF-II. Criterion validity was assessed compared with the V-VST and MEOF-II according to sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Construct and structural validity were examined using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch model analysis investigating item and person fit, differential item functioning for sex, age, primary disease and local dependency. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient alpha.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>For criterion validity, the 4QT-DK showed high sensitivity (84% and 90% with the V-VST and MEOF-II, respectively). As expected, specificity was lower (36%, and 42%). Analyses confirmed the psychometric validity of the 4QT-DK. Reliability was low (Cronbach's alpha = 0.58) due to the number of items.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The 4QT-DK is a valid and sensitive measure for screening older people for dysphagia. Further studies are required to assess the psychometric properties and confirm findings in a larger Danish sample. <b>Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 294–299</b>.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12546,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","volume":"25 2","pages":"294-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrics & Gerontology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ggi.15050","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

The four-item questionnaire test (4QT) is a simple screening measure of dysphagia for older people. A positive answer to any item indicates the need for further assessment. The 4QT is fast, simple to apply and requires no training beforehand. However, it is not translated to Danish, and the psychometric properties in an older Danish population are unknown. The aim was to translate the 4QT to Danish, determine criterion validity according to the existing measures, the Minimal Eating Observation Form-II (MEOF-II) and Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST), and determine construct and structural validity and reliability by exploring whether 4QT fits the assumptions of the Rasch model.

Methods

The 4QT was translated and back-translated. A total of 73 participants aged ≥65 years were included and screened with the 4QT-DK, and assessed using the V-VST and MEOF-II. Criterion validity was assessed compared with the V-VST and MEOF-II according to sensitivity, specificity and predictive values. Construct and structural validity were examined using confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch model analysis investigating item and person fit, differential item functioning for sex, age, primary disease and local dependency. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's coefficient alpha.

Results

For criterion validity, the 4QT-DK showed high sensitivity (84% and 90% with the V-VST and MEOF-II, respectively). As expected, specificity was lower (36%, and 42%). Analyses confirmed the psychometric validity of the 4QT-DK. Reliability was low (Cronbach's alpha = 0.58) due to the number of items.

Conclusion

The 4QT-DK is a valid and sensitive measure for screening older people for dysphagia. Further studies are required to assess the psychometric properties and confirm findings in a larger Danish sample. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 294–299.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
6.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geriatrics & Gerontology International is the official Journal of the Japan Geriatrics Society, reflecting the growing importance of the subject area in developed economies and their particular significance to a country like Japan with a large aging population. Geriatrics & Gerontology International is now an international publication with contributions from around the world and published four times per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信