Marleena Repo, Sara Koskimaa, Saana Paavola, Kalle Kurppa
{"title":"Serological testing for celiac disease in children.","authors":"Marleena Repo, Sara Koskimaa, Saana Paavola, Kalle Kurppa","doi":"10.1080/17474124.2025.2462245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Celiac disease is one of the most common chronic immune-mediated gastrointestinal conditions, characterized by the presence of disease-specific serum antibodies against self-antigen transglutaminase 2. Even though modern serological assays can identify most untreated celiac disease patients and are also increasingly being used to establish a diagnosis, several challenges are associated with the tests, including a lack of standardization, the variable sensitivity and specificity of commercial assays, and inadequate sensitivity for monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review outlines the current use of serological tests in case-finding and screening, as well as in the follow-up of dietary treatment. Additionally, the possible challenges and pitfalls of serological tests, along with future directions, are addressed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The excellent accuracy of modern autoantibody tests, especially for greatly elevated levels of transglutaminase 2 antibodies and positive endomysial antibodies, enables using serological testing in establishing a diagnosis. However, better international standardization of the assays is required, the necessity of endomysial antibody testing needs to be further scrutinized, and additional research is needed to improve noninvasive tools for follow-up and to further expand the no-biopsy criteria for celiac disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12257,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"155-164"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474124.2025.2462245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Celiac disease is one of the most common chronic immune-mediated gastrointestinal conditions, characterized by the presence of disease-specific serum antibodies against self-antigen transglutaminase 2. Even though modern serological assays can identify most untreated celiac disease patients and are also increasingly being used to establish a diagnosis, several challenges are associated with the tests, including a lack of standardization, the variable sensitivity and specificity of commercial assays, and inadequate sensitivity for monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet.
Areas covered: This narrative review outlines the current use of serological tests in case-finding and screening, as well as in the follow-up of dietary treatment. Additionally, the possible challenges and pitfalls of serological tests, along with future directions, are addressed.
Expert opinion: The excellent accuracy of modern autoantibody tests, especially for greatly elevated levels of transglutaminase 2 antibodies and positive endomysial antibodies, enables using serological testing in establishing a diagnosis. However, better international standardization of the assays is required, the necessity of endomysial antibody testing needs to be further scrutinized, and additional research is needed to improve noninvasive tools for follow-up and to further expand the no-biopsy criteria for celiac disease.
期刊介绍:
The enormous health and economic burden of gastrointestinal disease worldwide warrants a sharp focus on the etiology, epidemiology, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and development of new therapies. By the end of the last century we had seen enormous advances, both in technologies to visualize disease and in curative therapies in areas such as gastric ulcer, with the advent first of the H2-antagonists and then the proton pump inhibitors - clear examples of how advances in medicine can massively benefit the patient. Nevertheless, specialists face ongoing challenges from a wide array of diseases of diverse etiology.