Birth Outcomes among Infants Born between 2006 and 2018 after Maternal Exposure during Pregnancy to Ultrafine Particles from Aviation around a Large International Airport in the Netherlands.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1289/EHP14398
José H Jacobs, Alina Nicolaie, Maciej Strak, Jurriaan Hoekstra, Eline F de Vries, Joost Wesseling, Danny Houthuijs, Nicole A H Janssen
{"title":"Birth Outcomes among Infants Born between 2006 and 2018 after Maternal Exposure during Pregnancy to Ultrafine Particles from Aviation around a Large International Airport in the Netherlands.","authors":"José H Jacobs, Alina Nicolaie, Maciej Strak, Jurriaan Hoekstra, Eline F de Vries, Joost Wesseling, Danny Houthuijs, Nicole A H Janssen","doi":"10.1289/EHP14398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>People who live near airports are exposed to higher concentrations of ultrafine particles (UFPs) from aviation. Pregnant women and their fetuses, in particular, are considered to be highly susceptible to environmental exposures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Using existing national databases, we investigated associations between adverse birth outcomes and exposure to UFPs from aviation (UFP-aviation) at the residential address during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified <math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>286,000</mn></mrow></math> singleton birth records (from between 2006 and 2018) from mothers who, for at least 6 months during pregnancy, lived in a <math><mrow><mn>50</mn><mo>×</mo><mn>56</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>km</mi></mrow></math> area around Schiphol Airport. This information was linked to modeled monthly averaged UFP-aviation concentrations at the residential address during pregnancy. We modeled the association between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for individual and neighborhood level covariates. We performed a number of sensitivity analyses to investigate the robustness of the results, including adjustment for other air pollutants and noise.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effect estimates, expressed per 3,500 particles/cm<sup>3</sup> (approximately the 5th-9th percentile difference) increase, were generally positive in the main model for preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA) [PTB <math><mrow><mtext>OR</mtext><mo>=</mo></mrow></math> 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.07) and SGA <math><mrow><mtext>OR</mtext><mo>=</mo></mrow></math> 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)] and congenital anomalies (CAs) at birth [any CA <math><mrow><mtext>OR</mtext><mo>=</mo></mrow></math> 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)]. Associations with UFP-aviation became stronger in some of the sensitivity analyses, such as when the four municipalities with the lowest exposure were excluded (for PTB, SGA, and CA), when the population was restricted to mothers with a Dutch background (PTB), after nonlinear adjustment for nitrogen dioxide (<math><mrow><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>NO</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>2</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></mrow></math>) and elemental carbon (EC) (PTB), after including municipality as a random effect (CA), and in some specific strata of the population. No associations were found with infant mortality, low Apgar score, and low birth weight.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found suggestive evidence for associations between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14398.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"133 2","pages":"27001"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11790014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14398","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: People who live near airports are exposed to higher concentrations of ultrafine particles (UFPs) from aviation. Pregnant women and their fetuses, in particular, are considered to be highly susceptible to environmental exposures.

Objective: Using existing national databases, we investigated associations between adverse birth outcomes and exposure to UFPs from aviation (UFP-aviation) at the residential address during pregnancy.

Methods: We identified 286,000 singleton birth records (from between 2006 and 2018) from mothers who, for at least 6 months during pregnancy, lived in a 50×56km area around Schiphol Airport. This information was linked to modeled monthly averaged UFP-aviation concentrations at the residential address during pregnancy. We modeled the association between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes through logistic regression, adjusting for individual and neighborhood level covariates. We performed a number of sensitivity analyses to investigate the robustness of the results, including adjustment for other air pollutants and noise.

Results: Effect estimates, expressed per 3,500 particles/cm3 (approximately the 5th-9th percentile difference) increase, were generally positive in the main model for preterm birth (PTB) and small for gestational age (SGA) [PTB OR= 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.07) and SGA OR= 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)] and congenital anomalies (CAs) at birth [any CA OR= 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)]. Associations with UFP-aviation became stronger in some of the sensitivity analyses, such as when the four municipalities with the lowest exposure were excluded (for PTB, SGA, and CA), when the population was restricted to mothers with a Dutch background (PTB), after nonlinear adjustment for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and elemental carbon (EC) (PTB), after including municipality as a random effect (CA), and in some specific strata of the population. No associations were found with infant mortality, low Apgar score, and low birth weight.

Conclusions: We found suggestive evidence for associations between exposure to UFP-aviation during pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14398.

2006年至2018年期间出生的婴儿在怀孕期间暴露于荷兰一个大型国际机场周围航空产生的超细颗粒后的出生结果。
背景:住在机场附近的人会暴露在航空产生的高浓度超细颗粒(ufp)中。特别是孕妇及其胎儿,被认为极易受到环境暴露的影响。目的:利用现有的国家数据库,我们调查了不良出生结局与怀孕期间居住地址暴露于航空ufp (UFP-aviation)之间的关系。方法:我们从怀孕期间至少6个月居住在史基浦机场周围50×56km地区的母亲中确定了约28.6万单胎出生记录(从2006年到2018年)。这一信息与怀孕期间居住地址的每月平均ufp -航空浓度模型有关。我们通过逻辑回归,调整了个体和社区水平的协变量,建立了妊娠期间接触ufp航空与妊娠结局之间的关联模型。我们进行了许多敏感性分析,以调查结果的稳健性,包括对其他空气污染物和噪声的调整。结果:效应估计,每3500颗粒/cm3(约5 -9百分位差异)增加,在早产(PTB)和胎龄(SGA) [PTB OR= 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.07)和SGA OR= 1.02 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)]和出生时先天性异常(CA)[任何CA OR= 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)]的主要模型中普遍为正,而在出生时先天性异常(CA)[任何CA OR= 1.05 (95% CI: 0.98, 1.07)]中则较小。在一些敏感性分析中,与ufp航空的关联变得更强,例如当排除了最低暴露的四个城市(PTB, SGA和CA),当人口仅限于荷兰背景的母亲(PTB),在对二氧化氮(NO2)和元素碳(EC) (PTB)进行非线性调整后,在将城市作为随机效应(CA)之后,以及在一些特定的人口阶层中。未发现与婴儿死亡率、低阿普加评分和低出生体重有关。结论:我们发现了怀孕期间接触ufp航空与妊娠结局之间存在关联的暗示性证据。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP14398。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信