Clinical Outcomes of Two Lenticule Thickness Types in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: One-Year Results.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Neal Rangu, Michael Heath, Michael Szkarlat, Kai Ding, Roya Garakani, Kenan Bakri, Evan Pike, Hooman Harooni, Christopher Chow, Surendar Dwarakanathan, Liam Redden, Kamran M Riaz
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Two Lenticule Thickness Types in Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty: One-Year Results.","authors":"Neal Rangu, Michael Heath, Michael Szkarlat, Kai Ding, Roya Garakani, Kenan Bakri, Evan Pike, Hooman Harooni, Christopher Chow, Surendar Dwarakanathan, Liam Redden, Kamran M Riaz","doi":"10.1080/02713683.2025.2458152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical outcomes of eyes undergoing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with 51-99 μm and <50 μm lenticules.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, multi-center case series of 480 eyes undergoing DSAEK with precut tissue from a single eye bank between 2019 and 2022 performed by five surgeons at five centers. Eyes were divided into 51-99 μm or <50 μm groups according to post-cut graft thickness. The main outcome measure was inter-group comparison according to best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA); additional outcome measures were primary graft failure (PGF), rebubbling, and cystoid macular edema (CME) rates in context of specific preoperative risk factors, intraoperative characteristics, and vision-limiting vs. non-vision-limiting morbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BCDVA at one year postoperatively was 0.5 ± 0.5 and 0.4 ± 0.4 logMAR for the 51-99 μm and <50 μm groups, respectively (<i>p</i> = 0.692). Regraft rate was 3.21% for 51-99 μm and 1.89% for <50 μm grafts (<i>p</i> = 0.4854). Rebubbling rate was 8.56% for the 51-99 μm group and 13.21% for the <50 μm group (<i>p</i> = 0.151). Analysis of rebubbled eyes showed no difference in rate of sulfur hexafluoride tamponade (<i>p</i> = 0.201), lenticule insertion method (<i>p</i> = 0.293), and glaucoma surgery history (<i>p</i> = 0.996). Higher rebubbling rates occurred in eyes with previous scleral-fixated intraocular lenses (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The effect of potential preoperative and intraoperative risk factors (e.g. insertion method (<i>p</i> = 0.979) and concurrent cataract surgery (<i>p</i> = 0.701)) on rebubbling was not significantly different between the two groups. CME rate was 4.01% for 51-99 μm and 7.54% for <50 μm groups (<i>p</i> = 0.131).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>51-99 μm and <50 μm DSAEK grafts offer similar visual outcomes. Both lenticule thicknesses have similar regrafting, rebubbling, and CME rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":10782,"journal":{"name":"Current Eye Research","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Eye Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2025.2458152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare clinical outcomes of eyes undergoing Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) with 51-99 μm and <50 μm lenticules.

Methods: Retrospective, multi-center case series of 480 eyes undergoing DSAEK with precut tissue from a single eye bank between 2019 and 2022 performed by five surgeons at five centers. Eyes were divided into 51-99 μm or <50 μm groups according to post-cut graft thickness. The main outcome measure was inter-group comparison according to best-corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA); additional outcome measures were primary graft failure (PGF), rebubbling, and cystoid macular edema (CME) rates in context of specific preoperative risk factors, intraoperative characteristics, and vision-limiting vs. non-vision-limiting morbidities.

Results: BCDVA at one year postoperatively was 0.5 ± 0.5 and 0.4 ± 0.4 logMAR for the 51-99 μm and <50 μm groups, respectively (p = 0.692). Regraft rate was 3.21% for 51-99 μm and 1.89% for <50 μm grafts (p = 0.4854). Rebubbling rate was 8.56% for the 51-99 μm group and 13.21% for the <50 μm group (p = 0.151). Analysis of rebubbled eyes showed no difference in rate of sulfur hexafluoride tamponade (p = 0.201), lenticule insertion method (p = 0.293), and glaucoma surgery history (p = 0.996). Higher rebubbling rates occurred in eyes with previous scleral-fixated intraocular lenses (p < 0.001). The effect of potential preoperative and intraoperative risk factors (e.g. insertion method (p = 0.979) and concurrent cataract surgery (p = 0.701)) on rebubbling was not significantly different between the two groups. CME rate was 4.01% for 51-99 μm and 7.54% for <50 μm groups (p = 0.131).

Conclusions: 51-99 μm and <50 μm DSAEK grafts offer similar visual outcomes. Both lenticule thicknesses have similar regrafting, rebubbling, and CME rates.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Eye Research
Current Eye Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
163
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Current Eye Research is to provide rapid publication of full papers, short communications and mini-reviews, all high quality. Current Eye Research publishes articles encompassing all the areas of eye research. Subject areas include the following: clinical research, anatomy, physiology, biophysics, biochemistry, pharmacology, developmental biology, microbiology and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信