{"title":"Rethinking Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Patients with Cirrhosis: First, Do No Harm.","authors":"J Daniel Markley, Jasmohan S Bajaj","doi":"10.1093/cid/ciaf047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBPPr) in patients with cirrhosis has been considered standard of care since the 1990s and is currently recommended by several major gastroenterological societies. However, the evidence supporting this practice is weak and there is no clear mortality benefit. The unintended consequences of this strategy are not insignificant, both at the patient and population level. Recent evidence suggests that SBPPr may even cause harm. Since the widespread implementation of SBPPr three decades ago, our overall approach to antibiotic use has shifted. We now recognize the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), the potential harms of antibiotics, and the vital role of antimicrobial stewardship. In light recent developments and evidence, there is an urgent need for infectious disease, antimicrobial stewardship, and hepatology leaders to collaborate to develop an updated and cohesive approach to SBPPr.</p>","PeriodicalId":10463,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaf047","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Antibiotic prophylaxis for spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBPPr) in patients with cirrhosis has been considered standard of care since the 1990s and is currently recommended by several major gastroenterological societies. However, the evidence supporting this practice is weak and there is no clear mortality benefit. The unintended consequences of this strategy are not insignificant, both at the patient and population level. Recent evidence suggests that SBPPr may even cause harm. Since the widespread implementation of SBPPr three decades ago, our overall approach to antibiotic use has shifted. We now recognize the growing threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), the potential harms of antibiotics, and the vital role of antimicrobial stewardship. In light recent developments and evidence, there is an urgent need for infectious disease, antimicrobial stewardship, and hepatology leaders to collaborate to develop an updated and cohesive approach to SBPPr.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Infectious Diseases (CID) is dedicated to publishing original research, reviews, guidelines, and perspectives with the potential to reshape clinical practice, providing clinicians with valuable insights for patient care. CID comprehensively addresses the clinical presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of a wide spectrum of infectious diseases. The journal places a high priority on the assessment of current and innovative treatments, microbiology, immunology, and policies, ensuring relevance to patient care in its commitment to advancing the field of infectious diseases.