Progressive changes in delivery outcomes following the launch of round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia at an institution: A retrospective cohort study

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Onishi Tatsuki , Ryuichi Wakata , Sayo Hoshino , Kyomi Kasai
{"title":"Progressive changes in delivery outcomes following the launch of round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia at an institution: A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Onishi Tatsuki ,&nbsp;Ryuichi Wakata ,&nbsp;Sayo Hoshino ,&nbsp;Kyomi Kasai","doi":"10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.01.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Emergency caesarean section is associated with maternal and foetal complications, potentially exacerbated by general anaesthesia use.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine whether labour epidural analgesia use affects caesarean section incidence.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>This retrospective single-centre cohort study involved women in labour (n = 11,792) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. The primary outcome was caesarean section incidence, determined from electronic medical records; secondary outcome was caesarean section incidence change over time.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 5849 deliveries from 1 August 2018, when round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia became available, until 31 December 2021, 1,433 (24.5 %) involved labour epidural analgesia. Of these, 203 (14.2 %) involved unintended caesarean section, less than that in the non-labour epidural analgesia group (22.2 %) (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–0.55, p &lt; 0.001). Sensitivity analysis, assuming 50 % of non-labour epidural analgesia cases should have had used labour epidural analgesia, yielded a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95 %CI: 0.57–0.75, p &lt; 0.001). Propensity-score matching adjusted for possible confounders. Temporal changes in caesarean section incidence were analysed between 1 August 2018 and 31 October 2021. This passage of time explained the reduction in values for the difference-in-differences analysis by 20.5 % (95 %CI: 5.5–35.6, p = 0.007). Interrupted time series analysis revealed caesarean section incidence increased with time after round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia became available in the non-labour epidural analgesia group (p = 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia use is associated with decreased caesarean section incidence, partly due to optimisation of eligibility criteria. Labour epidural analgesia use should be expanded to aid vaginal delivery and improve maternal well-being.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11975,"journal":{"name":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","volume":"307 ","pages":"Pages 91-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301211525000491","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Emergency caesarean section is associated with maternal and foetal complications, potentially exacerbated by general anaesthesia use.

Objective

To determine whether labour epidural analgesia use affects caesarean section incidence.

Study design

This retrospective single-centre cohort study involved women in labour (n = 11,792) between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2021. The primary outcome was caesarean section incidence, determined from electronic medical records; secondary outcome was caesarean section incidence change over time.

Results

Of 5849 deliveries from 1 August 2018, when round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia became available, until 31 December 2021, 1,433 (24.5 %) involved labour epidural analgesia. Of these, 203 (14.2 %) involved unintended caesarean section, less than that in the non-labour epidural analgesia group (22.2 %) (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.41–0.55, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis, assuming 50 % of non-labour epidural analgesia cases should have had used labour epidural analgesia, yielded a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95 %CI: 0.57–0.75, p < 0.001). Propensity-score matching adjusted for possible confounders. Temporal changes in caesarean section incidence were analysed between 1 August 2018 and 31 October 2021. This passage of time explained the reduction in values for the difference-in-differences analysis by 20.5 % (95 %CI: 5.5–35.6, p = 0.007). Interrupted time series analysis revealed caesarean section incidence increased with time after round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia became available in the non-labour epidural analgesia group (p = 0.01).

Conclusions

Round-the-clock labour epidural analgesia use is associated with decreased caesarean section incidence, partly due to optimisation of eligibility criteria. Labour epidural analgesia use should be expanded to aid vaginal delivery and improve maternal well-being.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.80%
发文量
898
审稿时长
8.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology is the leading general clinical journal covering the continent. It publishes peer reviewed original research articles, as well as a wide range of news, book reviews, biographical, historical and educational articles and a lively correspondence section. Fields covered include obstetrics, prenatal diagnosis, maternal-fetal medicine, perinatology, general gynecology, gynecologic oncology, uro-gynecology, reproductive medicine, infertility, reproductive endocrinology, sexual medicine and reproductive ethics. The European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology provides a forum for scientific and clinical professional communication in obstetrics and gynecology throughout Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信