Evaluating the Impact of Preclinical and Clinical Exposure to the Pediatric Pulpotomy Procedure on Confidence Among Senior Dental Students: An Analytical Survey Study.

IF 1.5 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CCIDE.S501541
Ibtesam Alzain, Shouq Sultan Albqmi, Sadeem Mohammed Alkatheeri
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Preclinical and Clinical Exposure to the Pediatric Pulpotomy Procedure on Confidence Among Senior Dental Students: An Analytical Survey Study.","authors":"Ibtesam Alzain, Shouq Sultan Albqmi, Sadeem Mohammed Alkatheeri","doi":"10.2147/CCIDE.S501541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated senior dental students' confidence in their knowledge and clinical skills in performing pulpotomy procedures on primary molars based on the number of procedures performed on pediatric patients and/or extracted primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic survey was validated and modified from the National League of Nursing (NLN) questionnaire and was used to assess the student's satisfaction with past learning and self-confidence in performing pulpotomy on pediatric patients and primary extracted teeth. The questionnaire comprised 29 questions across six sections outlining various clinical experience and knowledge acquisition aspects. The target sample was senior dental students enrolled at a governmental dental school during the 2023-2024 academic year, which were 369 students who were recruited for this study. The association between knowledge and clinical experience of performing pulpotomies and self-confidence was analyzed using a chi-square test. The association between knowledge and practical/clinical experience and the competency grade was performed using an independent sample <i>t</i>-test and ANOVA (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the targeted subjects, 215 responded to the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 66.3%. A significant association was found between the number of procedures performed on pediatric patients and students' confidence levels (p<0.001), as well as between competency grades and confidence levels (p<0.001). In contrast, the number of times they practiced pulpotomy on extracted teeth did not significantly affect their confidence level (p=0.381). No significant association existed between knowledge scores and confidence levels (p=0.869). Those who reported better learning experiences were more likely to report higher confidence levels (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of pulpotomy procedures performed on pediatric patients significantly impacted students' confidence levels, while knowledge scores showed no correlation with confidence. A positive relationship between competency grades and confidence. These findings underscore the importance of practical training in enhancing both clinical skills and confidence in performing clinical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10445,"journal":{"name":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","volume":"17 ","pages":"85-97"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786595/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CCIDE.S501541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluated senior dental students' confidence in their knowledge and clinical skills in performing pulpotomy procedures on primary molars based on the number of procedures performed on pediatric patients and/or extracted primary teeth.

Methods: An electronic survey was validated and modified from the National League of Nursing (NLN) questionnaire and was used to assess the student's satisfaction with past learning and self-confidence in performing pulpotomy on pediatric patients and primary extracted teeth. The questionnaire comprised 29 questions across six sections outlining various clinical experience and knowledge acquisition aspects. The target sample was senior dental students enrolled at a governmental dental school during the 2023-2024 academic year, which were 369 students who were recruited for this study. The association between knowledge and clinical experience of performing pulpotomies and self-confidence was analyzed using a chi-square test. The association between knowledge and practical/clinical experience and the competency grade was performed using an independent sample t-test and ANOVA (α = 0.05).

Results: Of the targeted subjects, 215 responded to the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 66.3%. A significant association was found between the number of procedures performed on pediatric patients and students' confidence levels (p<0.001), as well as between competency grades and confidence levels (p<0.001). In contrast, the number of times they practiced pulpotomy on extracted teeth did not significantly affect their confidence level (p=0.381). No significant association existed between knowledge scores and confidence levels (p=0.869). Those who reported better learning experiences were more likely to report higher confidence levels (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The number of pulpotomy procedures performed on pediatric patients significantly impacted students' confidence levels, while knowledge scores showed no correlation with confidence. A positive relationship between competency grades and confidence. These findings underscore the importance of practical training in enhancing both clinical skills and confidence in performing clinical procedures.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
43
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信