Unexpected cardiac interventions including takedown after Glenn surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nicole Behm, Rittal Mehta, Can Yerebakan, Shriprasad R Deshpande
{"title":"Unexpected cardiac interventions including takedown after Glenn surgery: analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database.","authors":"Nicole Behm, Rittal Mehta, Can Yerebakan, Shriprasad R Deshpande","doi":"10.1017/S1047951125000058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Glenn procedure carries low morbidity and mortality within stages of single-ventricle palliation. However, some patients with Glenn failure need a stage reversal, while others require unanticipated surgical interventions. Our understanding of perioperative factors and outcomes associated with such unexpected interventions is extremely limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent unexpected surgery after the Glenn procedure between January 2010 and December 2019 within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS-CHSD) were identified with a subgroup analysis of those reverting to stage I physiology. Patient's requiring reversal to stage I palliation were matched 1:5 with controls. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for reintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 16,913 patients underwent Glenn procedure with 1221 (7.2%) requiring unexpected cardiac surgical intervention and 95 (0.56%) patients required takedown to a stage I. Significant clinical and operative risk factors were identified for such unexpected interventions.The overall mortality after Glenn procedure was 1.2%, while mortality after unexpected reintervention was 6.6% at 30 days and after Glenn takedown was 27.5% at last follow-up. Unexpected surgical intervention and right ventricular dominance were significant risk factors for mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unexpected reinterventions, including need for takedown after the Glenn procedure, are associated with significantly higher mortality. Further studies should focus on improving our patient selection, understanding the risk factors mechanistically, including impact of the right ventricle as systemic ventricle in order to avoid need for unexpected surgical interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9435,"journal":{"name":"Cardiology in the Young","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiology in the Young","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951125000058","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Glenn procedure carries low morbidity and mortality within stages of single-ventricle palliation. However, some patients with Glenn failure need a stage reversal, while others require unanticipated surgical interventions. Our understanding of perioperative factors and outcomes associated with such unexpected interventions is extremely limited.

Methods: Patients who underwent unexpected surgery after the Glenn procedure between January 2010 and December 2019 within the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS-CHSD) were identified with a subgroup analysis of those reverting to stage I physiology. Patient's requiring reversal to stage I palliation were matched 1:5 with controls. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for reintervention.

Results: A total of 16,913 patients underwent Glenn procedure with 1221 (7.2%) requiring unexpected cardiac surgical intervention and 95 (0.56%) patients required takedown to a stage I. Significant clinical and operative risk factors were identified for such unexpected interventions.The overall mortality after Glenn procedure was 1.2%, while mortality after unexpected reintervention was 6.6% at 30 days and after Glenn takedown was 27.5% at last follow-up. Unexpected surgical intervention and right ventricular dominance were significant risk factors for mortality.

Conclusion: Unexpected reinterventions, including need for takedown after the Glenn procedure, are associated with significantly higher mortality. Further studies should focus on improving our patient selection, understanding the risk factors mechanistically, including impact of the right ventricle as systemic ventricle in order to avoid need for unexpected surgical interventions.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiology in the Young
Cardiology in the Young 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
715
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cardiology in the Young is devoted to cardiovascular issues affecting the young, and the older patient suffering the sequels of congenital heart disease, or other cardiac diseases acquired in childhood. The journal serves the interests of all professionals concerned with these topics. By design, the journal is international and multidisciplinary in its approach, and members of the editorial board take an active role in the its mission, helping to make it the essential journal in paediatric cardiology. All aspects of paediatric cardiology are covered within the journal. The content includes original articles, brief reports, editorials, reviews, and papers devoted to continuing professional development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信