Lynden Rodrigues, Kevin Moncion, Sotiria Anna Angelopolous, Bernat De Las Heras, Shane Sweet, Janice J Eng, Joyce Fung, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Ada Tang, Marc Roig
{"title":"Psychosocial Responses to a Cardiovascular Exercise Randomized Controlled Trial: Does Intensity Matter for Individuals Post-Stroke?","authors":"Lynden Rodrigues, Kevin Moncion, Sotiria Anna Angelopolous, Bernat De Las Heras, Shane Sweet, Janice J Eng, Joyce Fung, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Ada Tang, Marc Roig","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the effect of cardiovascular high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on psychosocial responses to exercise, motivation and enjoyment, in individuals with chronic stroke.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A secondary analysis of motivation and enjoyment outcomes collected from a randomized controlled trial (NCT03614585) comparing 12-weeks of HIIT vs MICT in participants with chronic stroke (6-60 months post-stroke) was conducted.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>General community.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Seventy-one individuals with chronic stroke (mean ± SD, age: 65.5 ± 8.4 years, 19.4 ± 13.4 months post-stroke, 38% female) and mild disability (median ± IQR, NIH Stroke Scale score 1 ± 2).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Twelve-week, 3x/per week progressive cardiovascular HIIT or MICT program conducted on NuStep recumbent steppers.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3) was measured at week 1, 6 and 12. Enjoyment outcomes comprised of affective response (Feeling Scale) assessed at each training session, and post-exercise enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) assessed at week 6 and 12. Linear mixed models, examining group, time and group × time point interactions in motivation constructs and composite scores, mean affective response per session, and post-exercise enjoyment were used to compare the effect of HIIT vs. MICT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HIIT elicited a lower affective response (mean difference [95% CI]: -1.18 [-1.90, -0.47]; p = 0.002), that also progressively declined during sessions, in contrast to MICT (group × time point interaction: F [2,63.5] = 3.99, p = 0.02). HIIT and MICT did not elicit any significant difference between groups or change over time for post-exercise enjoyment or any motivation constructs (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite lower affective response during exercise, HIIT and MICT elicit equivalent motivation and post-exercise enjoyment. This study provides further support for the implementation of HIIT in stroke rehabilitation by demonstrating sustained responses of motivation and post-enjoyment. Future studies should consider potential strategies that positively reinforce these important psychosocial responses to implement HIIT in post-stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.01.468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the effect of cardiovascular high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) on psychosocial responses to exercise, motivation and enjoyment, in individuals with chronic stroke.
Design: A secondary analysis of motivation and enjoyment outcomes collected from a randomized controlled trial (NCT03614585) comparing 12-weeks of HIIT vs MICT in participants with chronic stroke (6-60 months post-stroke) was conducted.
Interventions: Twelve-week, 3x/per week progressive cardiovascular HIIT or MICT program conducted on NuStep recumbent steppers.
Main outcome measures: Motivation (Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-3) was measured at week 1, 6 and 12. Enjoyment outcomes comprised of affective response (Feeling Scale) assessed at each training session, and post-exercise enjoyment (Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale) assessed at week 6 and 12. Linear mixed models, examining group, time and group × time point interactions in motivation constructs and composite scores, mean affective response per session, and post-exercise enjoyment were used to compare the effect of HIIT vs. MICT.
Results: HIIT elicited a lower affective response (mean difference [95% CI]: -1.18 [-1.90, -0.47]; p = 0.002), that also progressively declined during sessions, in contrast to MICT (group × time point interaction: F [2,63.5] = 3.99, p = 0.02). HIIT and MICT did not elicit any significant difference between groups or change over time for post-exercise enjoyment or any motivation constructs (p>0.05).
Conclusions: Despite lower affective response during exercise, HIIT and MICT elicit equivalent motivation and post-exercise enjoyment. This study provides further support for the implementation of HIIT in stroke rehabilitation by demonstrating sustained responses of motivation and post-enjoyment. Future studies should consider potential strategies that positively reinforce these important psychosocial responses to implement HIIT in post-stroke rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.