Ellen Green, E Glenn Dutcher, Jesse D Schold, Darren Stewart
{"title":"The Dynamics of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Decision-Making: Insights from Studying Individual Clinicians' Offer Decisions.","authors":"Ellen Green, E Glenn Dutcher, Jesse D Schold, Darren Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the high demand, over 7,500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians versus enters and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (Jan. 2016-Dec. 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level dataset with 344,678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians versus centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed effects logistic regression models. To complement KDPI as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated Expected Acceptance Probability (EAP), which adjusts for a broader set of donor characteristics and also recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level variance (0.10, 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) were significant, with heterogeneity in the KDPI-acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Despite the high demand, over 7,500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians versus enters and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (Jan. 2016-Dec. 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level dataset with 344,678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians versus centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed effects logistic regression models. To complement KDPI as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated Expected Acceptance Probability (EAP), which adjusts for a broader set of donor characteristics and also recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level variance (0.10, 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) were significant, with heterogeneity in the KDPI-acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide.
The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.