The Dynamics of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Decision-Making: Insights from Studying Individual Clinicians' Offer Decisions.

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Ellen Green, E Glenn Dutcher, Jesse D Schold, Darren Stewart
{"title":"The Dynamics of Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Decision-Making: Insights from Studying Individual Clinicians' Offer Decisions.","authors":"Ellen Green, E Glenn Dutcher, Jesse D Schold, Darren Stewart","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the high demand, over 7,500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians versus enters and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (Jan. 2016-Dec. 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level dataset with 344,678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians versus centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed effects logistic regression models. To complement KDPI as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated Expected Acceptance Probability (EAP), which adjusts for a broader set of donor characteristics and also recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level variance (0.10, 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) were significant, with heterogeneity in the KDPI-acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2025.01.040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the high demand, over 7,500 recovered kidneys annually go unused, with transplant centers showing significant variation in their offer acceptance practices. However, it remains unclear how much of this variation occurs between individual clinicians within the same center and its impact on allocation efficiency and equity. This study quantified the variability in kidney offer acceptance decisions attributable to clinicians versus enters and examined the role of donor quality in acceptance decisions. We analyzed national transplant registry data (Jan. 2016-Dec. 2020) linked to on-call records from 15 transplant centers, creating a clinician-level dataset with 344,678 deceased donor kidney offers. The primary outcome was the variability in offer acceptance attributable to clinicians versus centers, quantified via hierarchical, mixed effects logistic regression models. To complement KDPI as a measure of donor quality, we incorporated Expected Acceptance Probability (EAP), which adjusts for a broader set of donor characteristics and also recipient factors. Both center-level (0.35, 95% CI: 0.15-0.79) and clinician-level variance (0.10, 95% CI: 0.06-0.18) were significant, with heterogeneity in the KDPI-acceptance association among clinicians. These results underscore the need for further research into the mechanisms driving the clinician-level variation and its implications for organ allocation efficacy, equity, and patient outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信