Xuan Tang, Guanghua Qin, Xuemei Wu, Yuting Zhao, Hongxia Li
{"title":"Causality-Guided Deep learning for streamflow predicting in a mountainous region","authors":"Xuan Tang, Guanghua Qin, Xuemei Wu, Yuting Zhao, Hongxia Li","doi":"10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.132719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Accurate streamflow predictions in mountainous regions are crucial for water resource management and flood mitigation. Deep learning (DL) models, which have been widely used for streamflow predicting recently, can simulate the nonlinear hydrological relationships but may not capture the underlying laws of physics. This study proposed a Causality-Guided Deep Learning (CGDL) model to enhance the streamflow predicting for mountainous regions by incorporating physics-based causal inference and improved multivariate Transfer Entropy (IMTE) algorithm. We assessed the CGDL model through a case study in a mountainous catchment using in situ hydrometeorological variables (precipitation, temperature, and humidity, etc.). The results demonstrated that CGDL outperformed DL and process-based (PB) models, achieving a higher <em>NSE</em> (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency) of 0.805, compared to 0.701 for DL and 0.716 for PB during the testing period. Furthermore, CGDL significantly reduced the <em>EHF</em> (Error of High Flow) to −9.7%, versus −14.9% for DL and –22.0% for the PB model in the testing period, highlighting its efficiency in high flow predictions. The CGDL also showed superior robustness and generalization when extending forecast lead time and simulating beyond the bounds of the training data. Additionally, the SHAP analysis indicated that CGDL provided greater interpretability than the DL model. This study demonstrates that integrating causality knowledge into deep learning models has the potential to enhance streamflow predicting in mountainous regions. It is helpful for improving our understanding of hydrological processes and decision-making to issue flood warnings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":362,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology","volume":"653 ","pages":"Article 132719"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022169425000575","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate streamflow predictions in mountainous regions are crucial for water resource management and flood mitigation. Deep learning (DL) models, which have been widely used for streamflow predicting recently, can simulate the nonlinear hydrological relationships but may not capture the underlying laws of physics. This study proposed a Causality-Guided Deep Learning (CGDL) model to enhance the streamflow predicting for mountainous regions by incorporating physics-based causal inference and improved multivariate Transfer Entropy (IMTE) algorithm. We assessed the CGDL model through a case study in a mountainous catchment using in situ hydrometeorological variables (precipitation, temperature, and humidity, etc.). The results demonstrated that CGDL outperformed DL and process-based (PB) models, achieving a higher NSE (Nash-Sutcliffe Efficiency) of 0.805, compared to 0.701 for DL and 0.716 for PB during the testing period. Furthermore, CGDL significantly reduced the EHF (Error of High Flow) to −9.7%, versus −14.9% for DL and –22.0% for the PB model in the testing period, highlighting its efficiency in high flow predictions. The CGDL also showed superior robustness and generalization when extending forecast lead time and simulating beyond the bounds of the training data. Additionally, the SHAP analysis indicated that CGDL provided greater interpretability than the DL model. This study demonstrates that integrating causality knowledge into deep learning models has the potential to enhance streamflow predicting in mountainous regions. It is helpful for improving our understanding of hydrological processes and decision-making to issue flood warnings.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hydrology publishes original research papers and comprehensive reviews in all the subfields of the hydrological sciences including water based management and policy issues that impact on economics and society. These comprise, but are not limited to the physical, chemical, biogeochemical, stochastic and systems aspects of surface and groundwater hydrology, hydrometeorology and hydrogeology. Relevant topics incorporating the insights and methodologies of disciplines such as climatology, water resource systems, hydraulics, agrohydrology, geomorphology, soil science, instrumentation and remote sensing, civil and environmental engineering are included. Social science perspectives on hydrological problems such as resource and ecological economics, environmental sociology, psychology and behavioural science, management and policy analysis are also invited. Multi-and interdisciplinary analyses of hydrological problems are within scope. The science published in the Journal of Hydrology is relevant to catchment scales rather than exclusively to a local scale or site.