Artificial intelligence auditability and auditor readiness for auditing artificial intelligence systems

IF 4.1 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
Yueqi Li , Sanjay Goel
{"title":"Artificial intelligence auditability and auditor readiness for auditing artificial intelligence systems","authors":"Yueqi Li ,&nbsp;Sanjay Goel","doi":"10.1016/j.accinf.2025.100739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the business community races to implement artificial intelligence (AI), there are several challenges that need to be addressed such as fairness and biases, transparency, denial of individual rights, and dilution of privacy. AI audits are expected to ensure that AI systems function lawfully, robustly, and follow ethical standards (e.g., fairness). While the auditability for financial audits and information system audits has been well addressed in the literature, auditability of AI systems has not been sufficiently addressed. AI auditability and auditors’ competencies are crucial for ensuring AI audits are conducted with high quality. Research on the auditability of AI and the competencies of AI auditors is gravely lacking leaving risks in AI systems unmitigated. The primary reason is that the field is nascent and the rapid growth has left the audit profession struggling to catch up. Foundational work on establishing parameters for such research would help advance this research. In this paper, we explore AI auditability measures and competencies required for conducting AI audits. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 23 experienced AI professionals who have direct involvement or indirect exposure to AI audits. Based on our findings, we propose a framework of AI auditability and identify the competencies required to conduct AI audits. Our study serves as the first formal attempt to systematically identify and classify auditability measures and auditors’ expertise demanded for AI audits based on practitioners’ perspectives. Our findings contribute to the AI audit literature, inform AI developers about implementing auditability, guide the training of new AI auditors, and establish a foundation for further research in the field.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47170,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article 100739"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Accounting Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1467089525000156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the business community races to implement artificial intelligence (AI), there are several challenges that need to be addressed such as fairness and biases, transparency, denial of individual rights, and dilution of privacy. AI audits are expected to ensure that AI systems function lawfully, robustly, and follow ethical standards (e.g., fairness). While the auditability for financial audits and information system audits has been well addressed in the literature, auditability of AI systems has not been sufficiently addressed. AI auditability and auditors’ competencies are crucial for ensuring AI audits are conducted with high quality. Research on the auditability of AI and the competencies of AI auditors is gravely lacking leaving risks in AI systems unmitigated. The primary reason is that the field is nascent and the rapid growth has left the audit profession struggling to catch up. Foundational work on establishing parameters for such research would help advance this research. In this paper, we explore AI auditability measures and competencies required for conducting AI audits. We conducted semi‐structured interviews with 23 experienced AI professionals who have direct involvement or indirect exposure to AI audits. Based on our findings, we propose a framework of AI auditability and identify the competencies required to conduct AI audits. Our study serves as the first formal attempt to systematically identify and classify auditability measures and auditors’ expertise demanded for AI audits based on practitioners’ perspectives. Our findings contribute to the AI audit literature, inform AI developers about implementing auditability, guide the training of new AI auditors, and establish a foundation for further research in the field.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Accounting Information Systems will publish thoughtful, well developed articles that examine the rapidly evolving relationship between accounting and information technology. Articles may range from empirical to analytical, from practice-based to the development of new techniques, but must be related to problems facing the integration of accounting and information technology. The journal will address (but will not limit itself to) the following specific issues: control and auditability of information systems; management of information technology; artificial intelligence research in accounting; development issues in accounting and information systems; human factors issues related to information technology; development of theories related to information technology; methodological issues in information technology research; information systems validation; human–computer interaction research in accounting information systems. The journal welcomes and encourages articles from both practitioners and academicians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信