{"title":"Pursuing a corporate sustainable identity: Green governance strategy, hybrid vehicle development, knowledge and sustainability performance","authors":"Akrum Helfaya , Phuong Bui","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The automobile industry's transition toward sustainability remains impeded by inconsistent green governance, which hampers progress in hybrid vehicle production. Existing literature predominantly focuses on technological innovation and consumer adoption, often overlooking the governance structures that foster environmental responsibility. This study proposes a framework of green governance strategy (GGS) designed to drive automakers’ proactive engagement in hybrid vehicle development. Grounded in social identity theory, our research challenges traditional perspectives on green innovation within the automobile industry. It highlights that companies with robust GGS act as pivotal drivers of hybrid vehicle development. Contrary to prior studies that relegated green products to a peripheral status, our findings position hybrid vehicles as <strong><em>central to corporate identity</em></strong>, integrating environmental responsibility with long-term profitability and alignment with sustainable development goals (SDGs). The study further reveals that despite economic pressures such as rising electricity costs, companies committed to GGS continue to prioritize hybrid vehicle production as a critical strategy to enhance sustainability performance and secure recognition in sustainability awards. However, a significant gap persists: 60 % of surveyed companies fail to address SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), while 55 % neglect SDG 13 (Climate Action). This misalignment emphasizes the need for more comprehensive goal integration across the sector. The findings provide valuable insights for scholars, policymakers, and industry standard-setters, offering guidance for developing future governance frameworks that support more holistic contributions to sustainable urban and climate goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 100660"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The automobile industry's transition toward sustainability remains impeded by inconsistent green governance, which hampers progress in hybrid vehicle production. Existing literature predominantly focuses on technological innovation and consumer adoption, often overlooking the governance structures that foster environmental responsibility. This study proposes a framework of green governance strategy (GGS) designed to drive automakers’ proactive engagement in hybrid vehicle development. Grounded in social identity theory, our research challenges traditional perspectives on green innovation within the automobile industry. It highlights that companies with robust GGS act as pivotal drivers of hybrid vehicle development. Contrary to prior studies that relegated green products to a peripheral status, our findings position hybrid vehicles as central to corporate identity, integrating environmental responsibility with long-term profitability and alignment with sustainable development goals (SDGs). The study further reveals that despite economic pressures such as rising electricity costs, companies committed to GGS continue to prioritize hybrid vehicle production as a critical strategy to enhance sustainability performance and secure recognition in sustainability awards. However, a significant gap persists: 60 % of surveyed companies fail to address SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), while 55 % neglect SDG 13 (Climate Action). This misalignment emphasizes the need for more comprehensive goal integration across the sector. The findings provide valuable insights for scholars, policymakers, and industry standard-setters, offering guidance for developing future governance frameworks that support more holistic contributions to sustainable urban and climate goals.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices.
JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience.
In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.