Pursuing a corporate sustainable identity: Green governance strategy, hybrid vehicle development, knowledge and sustainability performance

IF 15.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Akrum Helfaya , Phuong Bui
{"title":"Pursuing a corporate sustainable identity: Green governance strategy, hybrid vehicle development, knowledge and sustainability performance","authors":"Akrum Helfaya ,&nbsp;Phuong Bui","doi":"10.1016/j.jik.2025.100660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The automobile industry's transition toward sustainability remains impeded by inconsistent green governance, which hampers progress in hybrid vehicle production. Existing literature predominantly focuses on technological innovation and consumer adoption, often overlooking the governance structures that foster environmental responsibility. This study proposes a framework of green governance strategy (GGS) designed to drive automakers’ proactive engagement in hybrid vehicle development. Grounded in social identity theory, our research challenges traditional perspectives on green innovation within the automobile industry. It highlights that companies with robust GGS act as pivotal drivers of hybrid vehicle development. Contrary to prior studies that relegated green products to a peripheral status, our findings position hybrid vehicles as <strong><em>central to corporate identity</em></strong>, integrating environmental responsibility with long-term profitability and alignment with sustainable development goals (SDGs). The study further reveals that despite economic pressures such as rising electricity costs, companies committed to GGS continue to prioritize hybrid vehicle production as a critical strategy to enhance sustainability performance and secure recognition in sustainability awards. However, a significant gap persists: 60 % of surveyed companies fail to address SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), while 55 % neglect SDG 13 (Climate Action). This misalignment emphasizes the need for more comprehensive goal integration across the sector. The findings provide valuable insights for scholars, policymakers, and industry standard-setters, offering guidance for developing future governance frameworks that support more holistic contributions to sustainable urban and climate goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 100660"},"PeriodicalIF":15.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Innovation & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444569X25000113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The automobile industry's transition toward sustainability remains impeded by inconsistent green governance, which hampers progress in hybrid vehicle production. Existing literature predominantly focuses on technological innovation and consumer adoption, often overlooking the governance structures that foster environmental responsibility. This study proposes a framework of green governance strategy (GGS) designed to drive automakers’ proactive engagement in hybrid vehicle development. Grounded in social identity theory, our research challenges traditional perspectives on green innovation within the automobile industry. It highlights that companies with robust GGS act as pivotal drivers of hybrid vehicle development. Contrary to prior studies that relegated green products to a peripheral status, our findings position hybrid vehicles as central to corporate identity, integrating environmental responsibility with long-term profitability and alignment with sustainable development goals (SDGs). The study further reveals that despite economic pressures such as rising electricity costs, companies committed to GGS continue to prioritize hybrid vehicle production as a critical strategy to enhance sustainability performance and secure recognition in sustainability awards. However, a significant gap persists: 60 % of surveyed companies fail to address SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), while 55 % neglect SDG 13 (Climate Action). This misalignment emphasizes the need for more comprehensive goal integration across the sector. The findings provide valuable insights for scholars, policymakers, and industry standard-setters, offering guidance for developing future governance frameworks that support more holistic contributions to sustainable urban and climate goals.
追求企业可持续身份:绿色治理战略、混合动力汽车发展、知识与可持续绩效
不一致的绿色治理阻碍了汽车行业向可持续发展的过渡,这阻碍了混合动力汽车生产的进展。现有文献主要关注技术创新和消费者采用,往往忽视了促进环境责任的治理结构。本研究提出了绿色治理战略框架(GGS),旨在推动汽车制造商积极参与混合动力汽车的发展。基于社会认同理论,我们的研究挑战了汽车行业绿色创新的传统观点。它强调,拥有强大GGS的公司是混合动力汽车发展的关键驱动力。与之前的研究将绿色产品置于次要地位相反,我们的研究结果将混合动力汽车定位为企业形象的核心,将环境责任与长期盈利能力相结合,并与可持续发展目标(sdg)保持一致。该研究进一步表明,尽管面临电力成本上升等经济压力,但致力于GGS的公司仍然将混合动力汽车生产作为提高可持续发展绩效和获得可持续发展奖项认可的关键战略。然而,差距依然存在:60%的受访企业未能实现可持续发展目标11(可持续城市和社区),55%的受访企业忽视了可持续发展目标13(气候行动)。这种错位强调了在整个部门进行更全面的目标整合的必要性。研究结果为学者、政策制定者和行业标准制定者提供了有价值的见解,为制定未来的治理框架提供了指导,为可持续城市和气候目标做出更全面的贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.10
自引率
12.70%
发文量
118
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Innovation and Knowledge (JIK) explores how innovation drives knowledge creation and vice versa, emphasizing that not all innovation leads to knowledge, but enduring innovation across diverse fields fosters theory and knowledge. JIK invites papers on innovations enhancing or generating knowledge, covering innovation processes, structures, outcomes, and behaviors at various levels. Articles in JIK examine knowledge-related changes promoting innovation for societal best practices. JIK serves as a platform for high-quality studies undergoing double-blind peer review, ensuring global dissemination to scholars, practitioners, and policymakers who recognize innovation and knowledge as economic drivers. It publishes theoretical articles, empirical studies, case studies, reviews, and other content, addressing current trends and emerging topics in innovation and knowledge. The journal welcomes suggestions for special issues and encourages articles to showcase contextual differences and lessons for a broad audience. In essence, JIK is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to advancing theoretical and practical innovations and knowledge across multiple fields, including Economics, Business and Management, Engineering, Science, and Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信