Influence of wood resource types, conversion technologies, and plant size on the climate benefits and costs of advanced biofuels for aviation, shipping and heavy-duty transport

IF 9.9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Vedant Ballal , Marcos Djun Barbosa Watanabe , Matteo Gilardi , Eirik Ogner Jåstad , Per Kristian Rørstad , Bo Huang , Marvin Werra , Filippo Bisotti , Bernd Wittgens , Francesco Cherubini
{"title":"Influence of wood resource types, conversion technologies, and plant size on the climate benefits and costs of advanced biofuels for aviation, shipping and heavy-duty transport","authors":"Vedant Ballal ,&nbsp;Marcos Djun Barbosa Watanabe ,&nbsp;Matteo Gilardi ,&nbsp;Eirik Ogner Jåstad ,&nbsp;Per Kristian Rørstad ,&nbsp;Bo Huang ,&nbsp;Marvin Werra ,&nbsp;Filippo Bisotti ,&nbsp;Bernd Wittgens ,&nbsp;Francesco Cherubini","doi":"10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Advanced biofuels are a promising option to achieve ambitious climate change mitigation goals while fostering a circular bioeconomy. Norway aims to expand the production of advanced biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass through novel technologies, but the climate change mitigation benefits and techno-economic performance remain unclear. This study performs an environmental and techno-economic analysis of biofuels from alternative forest-based feedstock using a cost-optimization and spatially explicit econometric model, different emerging conversion technologies, plant production sizes, and priorities for fuel upgrading (aviation, shipping, or trucks). Our results show that a higher number of plants distributed in the country has around 50 % lower emissions for feedstock transport than a single large-scale plant, which instead is more profitable than multiple smaller-scale plants. The investigated technologies achieve 69–94 % lower GHG intensities than fossil fuels, with the highest savings when hydrogen for upgrading is internally produced. The expected future availability of green hydrogen reduces the difference among technologies. When considering GHG emissions only, all biofuel options show similar savings. However, the inclusion of non-GHG contributions reveals the highest mitigation for shipping, followed by road-freight transport and aviation. Processing 1 Mm<sup>3</sup> of feedstock annually can reduce impacts up to 0.55 MtCO<sub>2</sub>-eq./yr by 2050. Prioritizing bio-based jet fuel can mitigate 15 % of current Norwegian aviation emissions, while bio-based diesel can reduce emissions by 10 % in shipping or 3 % for road diesel. While the minimum selling price of biofuels is higher than fossil fuels, biofuels offer a lower cost of abatement compared to alternatives like batteries, green hydrogen, and e-fuels.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11664,"journal":{"name":"Energy Conversion and Management","volume":"327 ","pages":"Article 119586"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Conversion and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890425001098","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advanced biofuels are a promising option to achieve ambitious climate change mitigation goals while fostering a circular bioeconomy. Norway aims to expand the production of advanced biofuels from lignocellulosic biomass through novel technologies, but the climate change mitigation benefits and techno-economic performance remain unclear. This study performs an environmental and techno-economic analysis of biofuels from alternative forest-based feedstock using a cost-optimization and spatially explicit econometric model, different emerging conversion technologies, plant production sizes, and priorities for fuel upgrading (aviation, shipping, or trucks). Our results show that a higher number of plants distributed in the country has around 50 % lower emissions for feedstock transport than a single large-scale plant, which instead is more profitable than multiple smaller-scale plants. The investigated technologies achieve 69–94 % lower GHG intensities than fossil fuels, with the highest savings when hydrogen for upgrading is internally produced. The expected future availability of green hydrogen reduces the difference among technologies. When considering GHG emissions only, all biofuel options show similar savings. However, the inclusion of non-GHG contributions reveals the highest mitigation for shipping, followed by road-freight transport and aviation. Processing 1 Mm3 of feedstock annually can reduce impacts up to 0.55 MtCO2-eq./yr by 2050. Prioritizing bio-based jet fuel can mitigate 15 % of current Norwegian aviation emissions, while bio-based diesel can reduce emissions by 10 % in shipping or 3 % for road diesel. While the minimum selling price of biofuels is higher than fossil fuels, biofuels offer a lower cost of abatement compared to alternatives like batteries, green hydrogen, and e-fuels.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy Conversion and Management
Energy Conversion and Management 工程技术-力学
CiteScore
19.00
自引率
11.50%
发文量
1304
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: The journal Energy Conversion and Management provides a forum for publishing original contributions and comprehensive technical review articles of interdisciplinary and original research on all important energy topics. The topics considered include energy generation, utilization, conversion, storage, transmission, conservation, management and sustainability. These topics typically involve various types of energy such as mechanical, thermal, nuclear, chemical, electromagnetic, magnetic and electric. These energy types cover all known energy resources, including renewable resources (e.g., solar, bio, hydro, wind, geothermal and ocean energy), fossil fuels and nuclear resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信