Christina N. Kampoureli, Charlotte L. Rae, Cassandra Gould Van Praag, Neil A. Harrison, Sarah N. Garfinkel, Hugo D. Critchley, Jessica A. Eccles
{"title":"Neural processes linking joint hypermobility and anxiety: key roles for the amygdala and insular cortex","authors":"Christina N. Kampoureli, Charlotte L. Rae, Cassandra Gould Van Praag, Neil A. Harrison, Sarah N. Garfinkel, Hugo D. Critchley, Jessica A. Eccles","doi":"10.1192/bjp.2024.259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Background</span><p>Anxiety symptoms are elevated among people with joint hypermobility. The underlying neural mechanisms are attributed theoretically to effects of variant connective tissue on the precision of interoceptive representations contributing to emotions.</p><span>Aim</span><p>To investigate the neural correlates of anxiety and hypermobility using functional neuroimaging.</p><span>Method</span><p>We used functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging to quantify regional brain responses to emotional stimuli (facial expressions) in people with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) (<span>N</span> = 30) and a non-anxious comparison group (<span>N</span> = 33). All participants were assessed for joint laxity and were classified (using Brighton Criteria) for the presence and absence of hypermobility syndrome (HMS: now considered hypermobility spectrum disorder).</p><span>Results</span><p>Participants with HMS showed attenuated neural reactivity to emotional faces in specific frontal (inferior frontal gyrus, pre-supplementary motor area), midline (anterior mid and posterior cingulate cortices) and parietal (precuneus and supramarginal gyrus) regions. Notably, interaction between HMS and anxiety was expressed in reactivity of the left amygdala (a region implicated in threat processing) and mid insula (primary interoceptive cortex) where activity was amplified in people with HMS with GAD. Severity of hypermobility in anxious, compared with non-anxious, individuals correlated with activity within the anterior insula (implicated as the neural substrate linking anxious feelings to physiological state). Amygdala-precuneus functional connectivity was stronger in participants with HMS, compared with non-HMS participants.</p><span>Conclusions</span><p>The predisposition to anxiety in people with variant connective tissue reflects dynamic interactions between neural centres processing threat (amygdala) and representing bodily state (insular and parietal cortices). Correspondingly, interventions to regulate amygdala reactivity while enhancing interoceptive precision may have therapeutic benefit for symptomatic hypermobile individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":22495,"journal":{"name":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2024.259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Anxiety symptoms are elevated among people with joint hypermobility. The underlying neural mechanisms are attributed theoretically to effects of variant connective tissue on the precision of interoceptive representations contributing to emotions.
Aim
To investigate the neural correlates of anxiety and hypermobility using functional neuroimaging.
Method
We used functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging to quantify regional brain responses to emotional stimuli (facial expressions) in people with generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) (N = 30) and a non-anxious comparison group (N = 33). All participants were assessed for joint laxity and were classified (using Brighton Criteria) for the presence and absence of hypermobility syndrome (HMS: now considered hypermobility spectrum disorder).
Results
Participants with HMS showed attenuated neural reactivity to emotional faces in specific frontal (inferior frontal gyrus, pre-supplementary motor area), midline (anterior mid and posterior cingulate cortices) and parietal (precuneus and supramarginal gyrus) regions. Notably, interaction between HMS and anxiety was expressed in reactivity of the left amygdala (a region implicated in threat processing) and mid insula (primary interoceptive cortex) where activity was amplified in people with HMS with GAD. Severity of hypermobility in anxious, compared with non-anxious, individuals correlated with activity within the anterior insula (implicated as the neural substrate linking anxious feelings to physiological state). Amygdala-precuneus functional connectivity was stronger in participants with HMS, compared with non-HMS participants.
Conclusions
The predisposition to anxiety in people with variant connective tissue reflects dynamic interactions between neural centres processing threat (amygdala) and representing bodily state (insular and parietal cortices). Correspondingly, interventions to regulate amygdala reactivity while enhancing interoceptive precision may have therapeutic benefit for symptomatic hypermobile individuals.