{"title":"“The ladies in bloomers who gardened at Kew”: Pioneer professional women gardeners in late nineteenth century England","authors":"Derek Turner","doi":"10.1016/j.endeavour.2025.100979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The arrival of two young women gardeners at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in 1896 marked a watershed in English history of professional gardening. Assisted by new opportunities in science education for women, especially the horticultural training colleges for women like the pioneering, model campus established at Swanley, Kent, and by the willingness of the director at Kew to conduct the “experiment” of admitting women as gardeners, Annie Gulvin, Alice Hutchings, and the eight other women who followed them to Kew until 1903, demonstrated that their gardening knowledge and skills equalled those of the Kew men. The women students proved that they could obtain senior horticultural posts on completing their training, thus providing role models and inspiration for the rapidly increasing number of professional women gardeners who followed their example. The lives and careers of the Kew ladies confirm the findings of other scholars of the resistance by the male horticultural establishment to allowing women into their profession but nuances the view that it was only middle-class women who were able to achieve this break-through, demonstrating that the more important cause of their success, other than their own personal qualities, was access to a good scientific education independent of social class. This article offers an unprecedented analysis of the pioneering Kew ladies’ backgrounds, education, career outcomes, and impact in the gendered, professional world of horticulture.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51032,"journal":{"name":"Endeavour","volume":"49 1","pages":"Article 100979"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endeavour","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016093272500002X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The arrival of two young women gardeners at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew in 1896 marked a watershed in English history of professional gardening. Assisted by new opportunities in science education for women, especially the horticultural training colleges for women like the pioneering, model campus established at Swanley, Kent, and by the willingness of the director at Kew to conduct the “experiment” of admitting women as gardeners, Annie Gulvin, Alice Hutchings, and the eight other women who followed them to Kew until 1903, demonstrated that their gardening knowledge and skills equalled those of the Kew men. The women students proved that they could obtain senior horticultural posts on completing their training, thus providing role models and inspiration for the rapidly increasing number of professional women gardeners who followed their example. The lives and careers of the Kew ladies confirm the findings of other scholars of the resistance by the male horticultural establishment to allowing women into their profession but nuances the view that it was only middle-class women who were able to achieve this break-through, demonstrating that the more important cause of their success, other than their own personal qualities, was access to a good scientific education independent of social class. This article offers an unprecedented analysis of the pioneering Kew ladies’ backgrounds, education, career outcomes, and impact in the gendered, professional world of horticulture.
期刊介绍:
Endeavour, established in 1942, has, over its long and proud history, developed into one of the leading journals in the history and philosophy of science. Endeavour publishes high-quality articles on a wide array of scientific topics from ancient to modern, across all disciplines. It serves as a critical forum for the interdisciplinary exploration and evaluation of natural knowledge and its development throughout history. Each issue contains lavish color and black-and-white illustrations. This makes Endeavour an ideal destination for history and philosophy of science articles with a strong visual component.
Endeavour presents the history and philosophy of science in a clear and accessible manner, ensuring the journal is a valuable tool for historians, philosophers, practicing scientists, and general readers. To enable it to have the broadest coverage possible, Endeavour features four types of articles:
-Research articles are concise, fully referenced, and beautifully illustrated with high quality reproductions of the most important source material.
-In Vivo articles will illustrate the rich and numerous connections between historical and philosophical scholarship and matters of current public interest, and provide rich, readable explanations of important current events from historical and philosophical perspectives.
-Book Reviews and Commentaries provide a picture of the rapidly growing history of science discipline. Written by both established and emerging scholars, our reviews provide a vibrant overview of the latest publications and media in the history and philosophy of science.
-Lost and Found Pieces are playful and creative short essays which focus on objects, theories, tools, and methods that have been significant to science but underappreciated by collective memory.