Reimagining the Medical School Accreditation Process in a Rapidly Changing Health Care Environment.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005989
Charles G Prober, Aarti A Porwal, James O Woolliscroft, Joseph C Kolars
{"title":"Reimagining the Medical School Accreditation Process in a Rapidly Changing Health Care Environment.","authors":"Charles G Prober, Aarti A Porwal, James O Woolliscroft, Joseph C Kolars","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Health care is changing rapidly due to advances in biomedical science and technology, as well as an expanding body of medical knowledge. This transformation necessitates a reevaluation of medical education models. The medical school accreditation process, administered through the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) for MD-granting schools in the United States and Canada, plays a crucial role in maintaining educational standards. However, current LCME accreditation standards sometimes conflict with innovative educational practices, potentially hindering necessary progress. This Commentary considers how the accreditation process could better support medical education as it advances and adapts to the evolving needs of the health care environment. The authors propose strategies to enhance the accreditation process and better serve medical schools: align accreditation with competency-based education, share best practices identified during the accreditation process, encourage innovation, address financial burdens associated with preparing for accreditation, support institutional missions, embrace advances in science and technology, and facilitate rapid curriculum changes. Balancing compliance with innovation would help schools optimize the educational journey for future physicians and advance the shared goals of improved medical education and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"531-535"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005989","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Health care is changing rapidly due to advances in biomedical science and technology, as well as an expanding body of medical knowledge. This transformation necessitates a reevaluation of medical education models. The medical school accreditation process, administered through the Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) for MD-granting schools in the United States and Canada, plays a crucial role in maintaining educational standards. However, current LCME accreditation standards sometimes conflict with innovative educational practices, potentially hindering necessary progress. This Commentary considers how the accreditation process could better support medical education as it advances and adapts to the evolving needs of the health care environment. The authors propose strategies to enhance the accreditation process and better serve medical schools: align accreditation with competency-based education, share best practices identified during the accreditation process, encourage innovation, address financial burdens associated with preparing for accreditation, support institutional missions, embrace advances in science and technology, and facilitate rapid curriculum changes. Balancing compliance with innovation would help schools optimize the educational journey for future physicians and advance the shared goals of improved medical education and patient care.

在快速变化的医疗保健环境中重新设想医学院认证过程。
摘要:由于生物医学科学技术的进步,以及医学知识体系的扩大,医疗保健正在迅速改变。这种转变需要对医学教育模式进行重新评估。美国和加拿大医学教育联络委员会(LCME)负责的医学院认证程序在维持教育标准方面发挥着至关重要的作用。然而,目前的LCME认证标准有时与创新的教育实践相冲突,可能阻碍必要的进步。本评论考虑了认证过程如何能够更好地支持医学教育的发展和适应不断变化的卫生保健环境的需要。作者提出了加强认证过程和更好地为医学院服务的策略:将认证与基于能力的教育结合起来,分享认证过程中确定的最佳实践,鼓励创新,解决与准备认证相关的经济负担,支持机构使命,拥抱科学和技术的进步,并促进快速的课程改革。平衡遵守和创新将有助于学校优化未来医生的教育过程,并推进改善医学教育和患者护理的共同目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信