Sungchul Park, Ann M Nguyen, Zoe Lindenfeld, Ji Eun Chang
{"title":"Patient-Provider Communication for Lonely, Socially Isolated Adults in Medicare.","authors":"Sungchul Park, Ann M Nguyen, Zoe Lindenfeld, Ji Eun Chang","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults experiencing loneliness or social isolation may experience poor patient-provider communication, potentially contributing to suboptimal healthcare utilization, particularly in mental healthcare. However, empirical evidence is limited. Thus, this study examined whether there were differences in patient-provider communication and healthcare utilization between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes were patient-provider communication and healthcare utilization. The primary independent variables were loneliness and social isolation. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate adjusted differences in outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation. The analysis was conducted in September 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 4,433 Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness were 4.0 percentage points (95% CI=1.0, 7.1) more likely to report poor patient-provider communication compared to those without loneliness. Similarly, those with social isolation were 2.0 percentage points (1.1, 2.9) more likely to report poor communication than those without social isolation. The rates of mental healthcare utilization were higher among those with loneliness (1.8 [1.0, 2.6], 1.5 [0.8, 2.2], and 3.1 [1.1, 5.1] for social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists) or social isolation (2.3 [0.6, 4.0] for psychiatrists), but the overall level of mental healthcare utilization remained relatively low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight significant disparities in patient-provider communication among Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness and social isolation. These disparities may partly result from limited engagement with mental health services, which could help address their specific healthcare needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Older adults experiencing loneliness or social isolation may experience poor patient-provider communication, potentially contributing to suboptimal healthcare utilization, particularly in mental healthcare. However, empirical evidence is limited. Thus, this study examined whether there were differences in patient-provider communication and healthcare utilization between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation.
Methods: This study conducted a cross-sectional study using data from the 2021 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Outcomes were patient-provider communication and healthcare utilization. The primary independent variables were loneliness and social isolation. Regression analysis was conducted to estimate adjusted differences in outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries with and without loneliness and social isolation. The analysis was conducted in September 2024.
Results: The sample included 4,433 Medicare beneficiaries. Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness were 4.0 percentage points (95% CI=1.0, 7.1) more likely to report poor patient-provider communication compared to those without loneliness. Similarly, those with social isolation were 2.0 percentage points (1.1, 2.9) more likely to report poor communication than those without social isolation. The rates of mental healthcare utilization were higher among those with loneliness (1.8 [1.0, 2.6], 1.5 [0.8, 2.2], and 3.1 [1.1, 5.1] for social workers, psychologists, and psychiatrists) or social isolation (2.3 [0.6, 4.0] for psychiatrists), but the overall level of mental healthcare utilization remained relatively low.
Conclusions: These findings highlight significant disparities in patient-provider communication among Medicare beneficiaries experiencing loneliness and social isolation. These disparities may partly result from limited engagement with mental health services, which could help address their specific healthcare needs.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.