Tight Control and Radiological Progression: The Radiographic Outcomes of the TICOPA Study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Lija James, Philip S Helliwell, Elizabeth M A Hensor, Philip G Conaghan, Paul Emery, Laura C Coates
{"title":"Tight Control and Radiological Progression: The Radiographic Outcomes of the TICOPA Study.","authors":"Lija James, Philip S Helliwell, Elizabeth M A Hensor, Philip G Conaghan, Paul Emery, Laura C Coates","doi":"10.3899/jrheum.2024-1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Tight Control of Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) study was the first to undertake the treat-to-target approach in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our aim was to further investigate the radiographic changes in the TICOPA study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The TICOPA trial recruited patients with early treatment-naïve PsA. Plain radiographs of the hands and feet were taken at weeks 0 and 48. Clinical outcomes were recorded by a blinded assessor every 12 weeks. In post hoc analysis, bootstrapped quantile regression, adjusting for baseline values and minimization factors, was used to compare radiographic scores (modified Sharp/van der Heijde [mSvdH]), defined according to treatment arm or disease activity states.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Paired baseline and week 48 radiographs were available for 169/206 (82%) at week 48 (84 tight control [TC] arm, 85 standard care [StdC] arm). There was no difference in change in total mSvdH score seen with TC compared to StdC (median [IQR] 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.5] vs 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.0]; difference 0.0 [95% CI 0.0-0.0]). Median total mSvdH score change was lower in those achieving minimal disease activity, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis remission, and very low disease activity. The number of people with radiographic progression (an increase in total erosion score of ≥ 2 at week 48) was numerically lower in the TC group (5/84 [5.9%] vs 12/85 [14.1%]). Patients with radiographical progression presented with polyarticular disease and high C-reactive protein, and had poorer clinical outcomes at weeks 12 and 24.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These data confirm the benefit of achieving low disease activity states on subsequent radiographic outcomes but did not show a significant impact related to a TC management approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":50064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.2024-1035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The Tight Control of Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) study was the first to undertake the treat-to-target approach in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Our aim was to further investigate the radiographic changes in the TICOPA study.

Methods: The TICOPA trial recruited patients with early treatment-naïve PsA. Plain radiographs of the hands and feet were taken at weeks 0 and 48. Clinical outcomes were recorded by a blinded assessor every 12 weeks. In post hoc analysis, bootstrapped quantile regression, adjusting for baseline values and minimization factors, was used to compare radiographic scores (modified Sharp/van der Heijde [mSvdH]), defined according to treatment arm or disease activity states.

Results: Paired baseline and week 48 radiographs were available for 169/206 (82%) at week 48 (84 tight control [TC] arm, 85 standard care [StdC] arm). There was no difference in change in total mSvdH score seen with TC compared to StdC (median [IQR] 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.5] vs 0.0 [-2.0 to 0.0]; difference 0.0 [95% CI 0.0-0.0]). Median total mSvdH score change was lower in those achieving minimal disease activity, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis remission, and very low disease activity. The number of people with radiographic progression (an increase in total erosion score of ≥ 2 at week 48) was numerically lower in the TC group (5/84 [5.9%] vs 12/85 [14.1%]). Patients with radiographical progression presented with polyarticular disease and high C-reactive protein, and had poorer clinical outcomes at weeks 12 and 24.

Conclusion: These data confirm the benefit of achieving low disease activity states on subsequent radiographic outcomes but did not show a significant impact related to a TC management approach.

严格控制疾病是否会阻碍放射学进展?TICOPA研究的影像学结果。
目的:严格控制银屑病关节炎(TICOPA)研究是首个在银屑病关节炎中采用治疗-靶向方法的研究。我们的目的是进一步研究TICOPA研究中的影像学变化。方法:TICOPA试验招募早期DMARD naïve银屑病关节炎(PsA)患者。在第0周和第48周拍摄手足平片。临床结果由盲法评估每12周记录一次。在事后分析中,自启动分位数回归,调整基线值和最小化因素,用于比较放射评分(修改的van der Heijde-Sharp;mvdH-S)根据治疗组或疾病活动状态定义。结果:169/206(82.0%)患者在48周时可获得配对基线和48周x线片;84严格控制,85标准治疗。与标准治疗相比,严格控制组的总mvdH-S评分中位数(IQR)变化无差异[0.0 (-2.0,0.5)vs 0.0 (-2.0, 0.0);差异(95% CI) 0.0(0.0, 0.0)]。MDA、DAPSA缓解组和VLDA组的中位总mvdH-S评分变化较低。放射学进展(48周时侵蚀总分≥2分)的人数在严密对照组中较低(5/84[5.9%]对12/85[14.1%])。x线表现为多关节疾病、高活性蛋白的患者在第12周和第24周的临床结果较差。结论:这些数据证实了低疾病活动度对随后的影像学结果的益处,但没有显示出与严格控制管理方法相关的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rheumatology
Journal of Rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.10%
发文量
285
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rheumatology is a monthly international serial edited by Earl D. Silverman. The Journal features research articles on clinical subjects from scientists working in rheumatology and related fields, as well as proceedings of meetings as supplements to regular issues. Highlights of our 41 years serving Rheumatology include: groundbreaking and provocative editorials such as "Inverting the Pyramid," renowned Pediatric Rheumatology, proceedings of OMERACT and the Canadian Rheumatology Association, Cochrane Musculoskeletal Reviews, and supplements on emerging therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信