{"title":"The use of artificial intelligence to aid the diagnosis of lung cancer - A retrospective-cohort study.","authors":"J R Tugwell-Allsup, B W Owen, R Hibbs, A England","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>AI software in the form of deep learning-based automatic detection (DLAD) algorithms for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation have shown success in early detection of lung cancer (LC), however, there remains uncertainty related to clinical validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CXRs and their corresponding chest-CT scans were retrospectively collated from a single institution between January 2019-2020. A commercially available AI software was used to evaluate 320 CXRs (<6 years prior-to-diagnosis) from 105 positive LC patients and 103 negative controls. Clinical reports were extracted and coded to correlate against AI findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 105 LC patients, (57[55 %] men, median [IQR] age 73[68-83] years), clinical reports identified LC in 64 (61 %) whereas AI identified LC in 95 (90 %). AI diagnostic (image-level) and prognostic (patient-level) sensitivities were 57.6 % and 90.0 %, (81 % in correct location), respectively. On CXRs performed >12 months prior to LC diagnosis, the AI detected nodules in 24(23 %) cases of which 22/24 had negative clinical reports for lung nodule/mass. The potential median reduction in time-to-diagnosis for cases where AI identified nodule(s) on previous CXR, but clinical reports negative, was 193[IQR 42-598] days. Of the 103 'negative' controls (48[47 %] men, median [IQR] age 69[61-77] years) 20 patients had a nodule abnormality score above the threshold, generating a false-positive rate of 19 %.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AI software showed excellent performance in detecting LCs that initially went undetected on CXR. The algorithm has potential to increase LC detection rates and reduce time-to-diagnosis. Using the AI, in conjunction with a trained observer, could increase reporting accuracy and potentially improve clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>This study demonstrated the benefits and pitfalls associated with using AI in a clinical setting. It provides further evidence for utilising decision-support aids within clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2025.01.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: AI software in the form of deep learning-based automatic detection (DLAD) algorithms for chest X-ray (CXR) interpretation have shown success in early detection of lung cancer (LC), however, there remains uncertainty related to clinical validation.
Methods: CXRs and their corresponding chest-CT scans were retrospectively collated from a single institution between January 2019-2020. A commercially available AI software was used to evaluate 320 CXRs (<6 years prior-to-diagnosis) from 105 positive LC patients and 103 negative controls. Clinical reports were extracted and coded to correlate against AI findings.
Results: Of 105 LC patients, (57[55 %] men, median [IQR] age 73[68-83] years), clinical reports identified LC in 64 (61 %) whereas AI identified LC in 95 (90 %). AI diagnostic (image-level) and prognostic (patient-level) sensitivities were 57.6 % and 90.0 %, (81 % in correct location), respectively. On CXRs performed >12 months prior to LC diagnosis, the AI detected nodules in 24(23 %) cases of which 22/24 had negative clinical reports for lung nodule/mass. The potential median reduction in time-to-diagnosis for cases where AI identified nodule(s) on previous CXR, but clinical reports negative, was 193[IQR 42-598] days. Of the 103 'negative' controls (48[47 %] men, median [IQR] age 69[61-77] years) 20 patients had a nodule abnormality score above the threshold, generating a false-positive rate of 19 %.
Conclusion: The AI software showed excellent performance in detecting LCs that initially went undetected on CXR. The algorithm has potential to increase LC detection rates and reduce time-to-diagnosis. Using the AI, in conjunction with a trained observer, could increase reporting accuracy and potentially improve clinical outcomes.
Implications for practice: This study demonstrated the benefits and pitfalls associated with using AI in a clinical setting. It provides further evidence for utilising decision-support aids within clinical practice.
RadiographyRADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍:
Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.