Integrating machine learning for treatment decisions in anterior open bite orthodontic cases: A retrospective study.

IF 2.6 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Matthew Rhee, Mohammed H Elnagar, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Omid Halimi Milani, Ahmet Enis Cetin, Flavio Jose Sanchez
{"title":"Integrating machine learning for treatment decisions in anterior open bite orthodontic cases: A retrospective study.","authors":"Matthew Rhee, Mohammed H Elnagar, Veerasathpurush Allareddy, Omid Halimi Milani, Ahmet Enis Cetin, Flavio Jose Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This article explores the integration of machine learning (ML) algorithms to aid in treatment planning and extraction decisions for anterior open bite cases, leveraging demographic, clinical, and radiographic data to predict treatment outcomes and informed decision-making.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted using patient data from the University of Illinois Chicago Department of Orthodontics. Data included demographic, clinical, and radiographic information from 115 anterior open bite patients who successfully completed their treatment. ML algorithms, including random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and convolutional neural networks (CNN), were trained on a subset of the data to predict treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significant differences were observed in the percentages of males and females between the extraction and nonextraction groups and cephalometric variables between the two groups, which include maxillary depth, maxillary height, SN-palatal plane, facial angle, facial axis-Ricketts, FMA, total facial height, lower facial height, SNA, SNB, and SN-MP e ML algorithms examined consisted of CNN2, CNN1, and Random Forest, which demonstrated the highest accuracy rates (∼83%), while k-Nearest Neighbor had the lowest (∼73%). Key features influencing accuracy included crowding, SN-palatal plane, SNA, FMA, molar relation, and facial height measurements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study's evaluation of AI algorithms showed that CNN2, CNN1, and random forest had an accuracy of approximately 83% in classifying extraction versus nonextraction cases. Notably, features such as U-crowding, L-crowding, SN-palatal plane, SNA, FMA, molar relation, total facial height, lower facial height, and facial axis-Ricketts were most influential in achieving accuracy rates comparable to traditional methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":43456,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejwf.2024.12.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This article explores the integration of machine learning (ML) algorithms to aid in treatment planning and extraction decisions for anterior open bite cases, leveraging demographic, clinical, and radiographic data to predict treatment outcomes and informed decision-making.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study was conducted using patient data from the University of Illinois Chicago Department of Orthodontics. Data included demographic, clinical, and radiographic information from 115 anterior open bite patients who successfully completed their treatment. ML algorithms, including random forest, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, and convolutional neural networks (CNN), were trained on a subset of the data to predict treatment outcomes.

Results: Significant differences were observed in the percentages of males and females between the extraction and nonextraction groups and cephalometric variables between the two groups, which include maxillary depth, maxillary height, SN-palatal plane, facial angle, facial axis-Ricketts, FMA, total facial height, lower facial height, SNA, SNB, and SN-MP e ML algorithms examined consisted of CNN2, CNN1, and Random Forest, which demonstrated the highest accuracy rates (∼83%), while k-Nearest Neighbor had the lowest (∼73%). Key features influencing accuracy included crowding, SN-palatal plane, SNA, FMA, molar relation, and facial height measurements.

Conclusions: The study's evaluation of AI algorithms showed that CNN2, CNN1, and random forest had an accuracy of approximately 83% in classifying extraction versus nonextraction cases. Notably, features such as U-crowding, L-crowding, SN-palatal plane, SNA, FMA, molar relation, total facial height, lower facial height, and facial axis-Ricketts were most influential in achieving accuracy rates comparable to traditional methods.

将机器学习整合到前开咬正畸病例的治疗决策中:一项回顾性研究。
简介:本文探讨了机器学习(ML)算法的集成,以帮助前牙开咬病例的治疗计划和拔牙决策,利用人口统计学、临床和放射学数据来预测治疗结果和明智的决策。材料和方法:采用伊利诺伊大学芝加哥正畸科的患者资料进行回顾性研究。数据包括115名成功完成治疗的前牙开咬患者的人口学、临床和放射学信息。ML算法,包括随机森林、支持向量机、k近邻和卷积神经网络(CNN),在数据的子集上进行训练,以预测治疗结果。结果:拔除组和非拔除组之间的男性和女性百分比以及两组之间的头侧测量变量(包括上颌深度、上颌高度、sn -腭平面、面部角度、面部轴- ricketts、FMA、总面部高度、下面部高度、SNA、SNB和SN-MP)均存在显著差异。而k近邻最低(约73%)。影响准确性的主要特征包括拥挤度、sn -腭平面、SNA、FMA、磨牙关系和面部高度测量。结论:该研究对人工智能算法的评估表明,CNN2、CNN1和随机森林在分类提取与非提取案例方面的准确率约为83%。值得注意的是,诸如u型拥挤、l型拥挤、sn -腭平面、SNA、FMA、磨牙关系、面部总高度、下面部高度和面部轴- ricketts等特征对实现与传统方法相当的准确率影响最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信