Towards a Responsible Implementation of NIPT as a First-Tier Test in Canada: Decision-Makers' Perspectives.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Prenatal Diagnosis Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1002/pd.6753
Marie-Christine Roy, Marie-Françoise Malo, Tierry Morel-Laforce, Vardit Ravitsky, Anne-Marie Laberge
{"title":"Towards a Responsible Implementation of NIPT as a First-Tier Test in Canada: Decision-Makers' Perspectives.","authors":"Marie-Christine Roy, Marie-Françoise Malo, Tierry Morel-Laforce, Vardit Ravitsky, Anne-Marie Laberge","doi":"10.1002/pd.6753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore decision makers' perspectives on the conditions for a responsible implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test in Canadian provinces' healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted with 16 Canadian decision makers who were interviewed between February 2021 and July 2022. After anonymization and transcription, interviews were coded inductively using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our interviews showed the complexity of the decision making environment regarding prenatal screening funding. Participants agreed that NIPT is superior to maternal serum screening as a first-tier test, but they also recognized that first-tier NIPT has limits and barriers. They described the following conditions for its responsible implementation: (1) need for time and evidence; (2) taking stakeholders' perspectives into account; (3) limit costs for the healthcare system; (4) ensure appropriate logistical conditions and harmonize the test offer; (5) ensure appropriate clinical services; (6) ensure informed consent; (7) ensure the test is presented as an individual choice to avoid eugenic concerns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multiple barriers and issues need to be addressed before moving NIPT from second- to first-tier. Decision makers' perspectives should be contrasted with those of other important stakeholders, including pregnant people, disability advocates and healthcare professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20387,"journal":{"name":"Prenatal Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prenatal Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6753","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore decision makers' perspectives on the conditions for a responsible implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) as a first-tier test in Canadian provinces' healthcare systems.

Method: A qualitative study was conducted with 16 Canadian decision makers who were interviewed between February 2021 and July 2022. After anonymization and transcription, interviews were coded inductively using thematic analysis.

Results: Our interviews showed the complexity of the decision making environment regarding prenatal screening funding. Participants agreed that NIPT is superior to maternal serum screening as a first-tier test, but they also recognized that first-tier NIPT has limits and barriers. They described the following conditions for its responsible implementation: (1) need for time and evidence; (2) taking stakeholders' perspectives into account; (3) limit costs for the healthcare system; (4) ensure appropriate logistical conditions and harmonize the test offer; (5) ensure appropriate clinical services; (6) ensure informed consent; (7) ensure the test is presented as an individual choice to avoid eugenic concerns.

Conclusion: Multiple barriers and issues need to be addressed before moving NIPT from second- to first-tier. Decision makers' perspectives should be contrasted with those of other important stakeholders, including pregnant people, disability advocates and healthcare professionals.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prenatal Diagnosis
Prenatal Diagnosis 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
204
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Prenatal Diagnosis welcomes submissions in all aspects of prenatal diagnosis with a particular focus on areas in which molecular biology and genetics interface with prenatal care and therapy, encompassing: all aspects of fetal imaging, including sonography and magnetic resonance imaging; prenatal cytogenetics, including molecular studies and array CGH; prenatal screening studies; fetal cells and cell-free nucleic acids in maternal blood and other fluids; preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD); prenatal diagnosis of single gene disorders, including metabolic disorders; fetal therapy; fetal and placental development and pathology; development and evaluation of laboratory services for prenatal diagnosis; psychosocial, legal, ethical and economic aspects of prenatal diagnosis; prenatal genetic counseling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信