Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion detection at 1.5T MRI in multiple sclerosis patients.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Maria Sofia Martire, Lucia Moiola, Pietro Maggi, Serena Borrelli, Valentina Novati, Vittorio Martinelli, Maria A Rocca, Paolo Vezzulli, Andrea Falini, Massimo Filippi, Martina Absinta
{"title":"Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion detection at 1.5T MRI in multiple sclerosis patients.","authors":"Maria Sofia Martire, Lucia Moiola, Pietro Maggi, Serena Borrelli, Valentina Novati, Vittorio Martinelli, Maria A Rocca, Paolo Vezzulli, Andrea Falini, Massimo Filippi, Martina Absinta","doi":"10.1177/13524585251314358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) are valuable for diagnosing and prognosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and detectable at 7T and 3T MRI. For translation into clinical practice, it is essential assessing their visibility on 1.5T clinical scanners.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the reliability of detecting PRL using commercially available susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5 versus 3T MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SWI images were obtained in 20 people with MS at 1.5T and 3T MRI, with an average scan interval of 1.1 years. Only stable, non-enhancing lesions visible on both scans were analyzed. PRL at 3T were identified by two expert raters using NAIMS PRL criteria and used as a reference. Four raters, blinded to 3T results, assessed PRL at 1.5T. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PRL were identified in 16 of 20 patients. At 3T, 95 PRL were identified by consensus (mean 5 PRL per patient, range 0-30). Blinded to 3T scans, 82% of PRL were visible at 1.5T (78 of 95 PRL). Interrater reliability was \"almost perfect\" for both 1.5 and 3T scans. Raters accurately classified all patients as having ⩾1PRL or not at 1.5T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of PRL are detectable at 1.5T without significantly reducing the specificity of PRL identification or increasing the detection of pseudo-PRL. This may facilitate their clinical use in MS diagnosis and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"13524585251314358"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251314358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) are valuable for diagnosing and prognosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and detectable at 7T and 3T MRI. For translation into clinical practice, it is essential assessing their visibility on 1.5T clinical scanners.

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of detecting PRL using commercially available susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5 versus 3T MRI.

Methods: SWI images were obtained in 20 people with MS at 1.5T and 3T MRI, with an average scan interval of 1.1 years. Only stable, non-enhancing lesions visible on both scans were analyzed. PRL at 3T were identified by two expert raters using NAIMS PRL criteria and used as a reference. Four raters, blinded to 3T results, assessed PRL at 1.5T. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

Results: PRL were identified in 16 of 20 patients. At 3T, 95 PRL were identified by consensus (mean 5 PRL per patient, range 0-30). Blinded to 3T scans, 82% of PRL were visible at 1.5T (78 of 95 PRL). Interrater reliability was "almost perfect" for both 1.5 and 3T scans. Raters accurately classified all patients as having ⩾1PRL or not at 1.5T.

Conclusion: The majority of PRL are detectable at 1.5T without significantly reducing the specificity of PRL identification or increasing the detection of pseudo-PRL. This may facilitate their clinical use in MS diagnosis and prognosis.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信