Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion detection at 1.5T MRI in multiple sclerosis patients.

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Multiple Sclerosis Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1177/13524585251314358
Maria Sofia Martire, Lucia Moiola, Pietro Maggi, Serena Borrelli, Valentina Novati, Vittorio Martinelli, Maria A Rocca, Paolo Vezzulli, Andrea Falini, Massimo Filippi, Martina Absinta
{"title":"Reliability of paramagnetic rim lesion detection at 1.5T MRI in multiple sclerosis patients.","authors":"Maria Sofia Martire, Lucia Moiola, Pietro Maggi, Serena Borrelli, Valentina Novati, Vittorio Martinelli, Maria A Rocca, Paolo Vezzulli, Andrea Falini, Massimo Filippi, Martina Absinta","doi":"10.1177/13524585251314358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) are valuable for diagnosing and prognosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and detectable at 7T and 3T MRI. For translation into clinical practice, it is essential assessing their visibility on 1.5T clinical scanners.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the reliability of detecting PRL using commercially available susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5 versus 3T MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SWI images were obtained in 20 people with MS at 1.5T and 3T MRI, with an average scan interval of 1.1 years. Only stable, non-enhancing lesions visible on both scans were analyzed. PRL at 3T were identified by two expert raters using NAIMS PRL criteria and used as a reference. Four raters, blinded to 3T results, assessed PRL at 1.5T. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PRL were identified in 16 of 20 patients. At 3T, 95 PRL were identified by consensus (mean 5 PRL per patient, range 0-30). Blinded to 3T scans, 82% of PRL were visible at 1.5T (78 of 95 PRL). Interrater reliability was \"almost perfect\" for both 1.5 and 3T scans. Raters accurately classified all patients as having ⩾1PRL or not at 1.5T.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The majority of PRL are detectable at 1.5T without significantly reducing the specificity of PRL identification or increasing the detection of pseudo-PRL. This may facilitate their clinical use in MS diagnosis and prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18874,"journal":{"name":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","volume":" ","pages":"955-963"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple Sclerosis Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585251314358","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRL) are valuable for diagnosing and prognosing multiple sclerosis (MS) and detectable at 7T and 3T MRI. For translation into clinical practice, it is essential assessing their visibility on 1.5T clinical scanners.

Objective: To evaluate the reliability of detecting PRL using commercially available susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) at 1.5 versus 3T MRI.

Methods: SWI images were obtained in 20 people with MS at 1.5T and 3T MRI, with an average scan interval of 1.1 years. Only stable, non-enhancing lesions visible on both scans were analyzed. PRL at 3T were identified by two expert raters using NAIMS PRL criteria and used as a reference. Four raters, blinded to 3T results, assessed PRL at 1.5T. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

Results: PRL were identified in 16 of 20 patients. At 3T, 95 PRL were identified by consensus (mean 5 PRL per patient, range 0-30). Blinded to 3T scans, 82% of PRL were visible at 1.5T (78 of 95 PRL). Interrater reliability was "almost perfect" for both 1.5 and 3T scans. Raters accurately classified all patients as having ⩾1PRL or not at 1.5T.

Conclusion: The majority of PRL are detectable at 1.5T without significantly reducing the specificity of PRL identification or increasing the detection of pseudo-PRL. This may facilitate their clinical use in MS diagnosis and prognosis.

1.5T MRI对多发性硬化症患者顺磁边缘病变检测的可靠性。
背景:顺磁边缘病变(PRL)对多发性硬化症(MS)的诊断和预后有价值,在7T和3T MRI上可检测到。为了转化为临床实践,必须评估它们在1.5T临床扫描仪上的可见性。目的:评价市售的敏感性加权成像(SWI)在1.5 t和3T MRI下检测PRL的可靠性。方法:对20例MS患者在1.5T和3T MRI上获得SWI图像,平均扫描间隔为1.1年。只分析两种扫描上可见的稳定的、非增强的病变。3T时的PRL由两名专家评分员使用NAIMS PRL标准进行鉴定,并作为参考。4名评分者对3T结果不知情,在1.5T时评估PRL。分歧经协商一致解决。结果:20例患者中16例出现PRL。在3T时,一致确定了95个PRL(平均每位患者5个PRL,范围0-30)。盲法3T扫描,82%的PRL在1.5T可见(78 / 95 PRL)。在1.5 t和3T扫描中,互解释器的可靠性“几乎是完美的”。评分者在1.5T时准确地将所有患者分类为或不具有大于或等于1PRL。结论:大多数PRL在1.5T时可检出,且未显著降低PRL鉴定的特异性或增加伪PRL的检出率。这可能有助于它们在MS诊断和预后方面的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Multiple Sclerosis Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal that focuses on all aspects of multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica and other related autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system. The journal for your research in the following areas: * __Biologic basis:__ pathology, myelin biology, pathophysiology of the blood/brain barrier, axo-glial pathobiology, remyelination, virology and microbiome, immunology, proteomics * __Epidemology and genetics:__ genetics epigenetics, epidemiology * __Clinical and Neuroimaging:__ clinical neurology, biomarkers, neuroimaging and clinical outcome measures * __Therapeutics and rehabilitation:__ therapeutics, rehabilitation, psychology, neuroplasticity, neuroprotection, and systematic management Print ISSN: 1352-4585
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信