Selection of resistant coliform bacteria in the intestine of pigs following flock versus individual treatment with neomycin against post-weaning diarrhoae or amoxicillin against umbilical infection.

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Egle Kudirkiene, Esben Østergaard Eriksen, Gang Liu, Anja Ejlersgård Christensen, Marianne Viuf Agerlin, Inge Larsen, Nicolai Rosager Weber, Ken Steen Pedersen, Jens Peter Nielsen, John Elmerdahl Olsen
{"title":"Selection of resistant coliform bacteria in the intestine of pigs following flock versus individual treatment with neomycin against post-weaning diarrhoae or amoxicillin against umbilical infection.","authors":"Egle Kudirkiene, Esben Østergaard Eriksen, Gang Liu, Anja Ejlersgård Christensen, Marianne Viuf Agerlin, Inge Larsen, Nicolai Rosager Weber, Ken Steen Pedersen, Jens Peter Nielsen, John Elmerdahl Olsen","doi":"10.1093/lambio/ovaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of avoiding flock treatment on resistance levels in the intestine of pigs. To investigate this, studies, each in two pig herds, quantified resistant coliforms by culture method in pigs treated as flock or as individual animal treatments orally with neomycin against post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) or intramuscularly with amoxicillin to prevent umbilical infection. Individual oral treatment against PWD did not lead to a lower number or proportion of resistant coliforms compared to flock treated pigs in any of the two herds under study, despite reduction of treatment incidences to 32% and 35% of pigs. After intramuscular treatment against umbilical infection, fewer resistant bacteria were seen in individually treated piglets in a herd with low treatment incidence (33%), while no reduction of resistant coliform bacteria compared to flock treatment was observed in the other herd with higher treatment incidence (86%). Thus, individual animal treatment reduced the amount of antimicrobial used, but concurrent reduction in resistant coliform bacteria was not always observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":17962,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovaf008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of avoiding flock treatment on resistance levels in the intestine of pigs. To investigate this, studies, each in two pig herds, quantified resistant coliforms by culture method in pigs treated as flock or as individual animal treatments orally with neomycin against post-weaning diarrhea (PWD) or intramuscularly with amoxicillin to prevent umbilical infection. Individual oral treatment against PWD did not lead to a lower number or proportion of resistant coliforms compared to flock treated pigs in any of the two herds under study, despite reduction of treatment incidences to 32% and 35% of pigs. After intramuscular treatment against umbilical infection, fewer resistant bacteria were seen in individually treated piglets in a herd with low treatment incidence (33%), while no reduction of resistant coliform bacteria compared to flock treatment was observed in the other herd with higher treatment incidence (86%). Thus, individual animal treatment reduced the amount of antimicrobial used, but concurrent reduction in resistant coliform bacteria was not always observed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
225
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信