Modified graded skull base reconstruction for intraoperative CSF leak repair in endoscopic endonasal surgeries: a single-surgeon experience in initial years of practice and nuances in the early learning curve.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mehdi Khaleghi, Adnan Hussain Shahid, Sudhir Suggala, Garrett Dyess, Ursula Noelle Hummel, Danielle N Chason, Danner Butler, Jai Deep Thakur
{"title":"Modified graded skull base reconstruction for intraoperative CSF leak repair in endoscopic endonasal surgeries: a single-surgeon experience in initial years of practice and nuances in the early learning curve.","authors":"Mehdi Khaleghi, Adnan Hussain Shahid, Sudhir Suggala, Garrett Dyess, Ursula Noelle Hummel, Danielle N Chason, Danner Butler, Jai Deep Thakur","doi":"10.3171/2024.11.FOCUS24733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a modified graded reconstruction technique based on the size of intraoperative CSF leaks in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery performed by a single surgeon in the early years of his practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The database of patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) between September 2020 and August 2024 was included. Surgical complexity was categorized into levels II, III, and IV. Intraoperative CSF leak was categorized into 4 grades (0-3). Patients were divided into 2 timeline groups (those undergoing an EEA between 2020 and 2022 [group A] and between 2023 and 2024 [group B]) to assess the trends in surgical complexity and repair outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 69 patients with a mean age of 56 ± 16.9 years (range 12-83 years) were identified; 34 (49.3%) were female. The median body mass index was 31 (> 25 in 82.6%). The most common pathology was nonsecretory macroadenoma (57.9%). The EEA at complexity levels II, III, and IV was performed in 36.2%, 46.4%, and 17.4% of the patients, respectively. Intraoperative CSF leaks grades 1, 2, and 3 were encountered in 39.1%, 7.2%, and 17.4% of the patients, whereas 36.2% did not develop leaks (grade 0). Fat grafts and collagen matrix were used for all patients with grades 1-3. Patients with complexity level II only developed grade 1 and 2 leaks, and none of level III developed grade 3. A nasoseptal flap was used in 4 patients (5.8%), with all having level IV surgery and grade 3 intraoperative leak. Only 1 patient (1.4%) developed a postoperative CSF leak, and a lumbar drain was only used for this patient (1.4%) at the revision surgery. The rate of grades 2 and 3 leaks in group B was significantly lower than in group A (8.3% vs 33.3%, p = 0.022). Temporary nasal packing usage was also significantly lower in group B (8.3%) than in group A (28.9%) (p = 0.049), whereas high-complexity EEA rates and pedicled flap usage were not correlated with the year of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A graded endoscopic endonasal repair protocol, combined with the judicious use of lumbar drains and nasoseptal flaps rather than a reflexive approach, helps in minimizing postoperative CSF leak rates. Cross-training of neurosurgery graduates focusing on skull base practice is highly recommended for maximizing good outcomes in their early years of practice. With growing experience, intraoperative leak rates tend to decrease, and the reconstruction relies on a tailored multilayer strategy rather than bulky synthetic materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":19187,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical focus","volume":"58 2","pages":"E6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.11.FOCUS24733","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of a modified graded reconstruction technique based on the size of intraoperative CSF leaks in patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal surgery performed by a single surgeon in the early years of his practice.

Methods: The database of patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs) between September 2020 and August 2024 was included. Surgical complexity was categorized into levels II, III, and IV. Intraoperative CSF leak was categorized into 4 grades (0-3). Patients were divided into 2 timeline groups (those undergoing an EEA between 2020 and 2022 [group A] and between 2023 and 2024 [group B]) to assess the trends in surgical complexity and repair outcomes.

Results: A total of 69 patients with a mean age of 56 ± 16.9 years (range 12-83 years) were identified; 34 (49.3%) were female. The median body mass index was 31 (> 25 in 82.6%). The most common pathology was nonsecretory macroadenoma (57.9%). The EEA at complexity levels II, III, and IV was performed in 36.2%, 46.4%, and 17.4% of the patients, respectively. Intraoperative CSF leaks grades 1, 2, and 3 were encountered in 39.1%, 7.2%, and 17.4% of the patients, whereas 36.2% did not develop leaks (grade 0). Fat grafts and collagen matrix were used for all patients with grades 1-3. Patients with complexity level II only developed grade 1 and 2 leaks, and none of level III developed grade 3. A nasoseptal flap was used in 4 patients (5.8%), with all having level IV surgery and grade 3 intraoperative leak. Only 1 patient (1.4%) developed a postoperative CSF leak, and a lumbar drain was only used for this patient (1.4%) at the revision surgery. The rate of grades 2 and 3 leaks in group B was significantly lower than in group A (8.3% vs 33.3%, p = 0.022). Temporary nasal packing usage was also significantly lower in group B (8.3%) than in group A (28.9%) (p = 0.049), whereas high-complexity EEA rates and pedicled flap usage were not correlated with the year of surgery.

Conclusions: A graded endoscopic endonasal repair protocol, combined with the judicious use of lumbar drains and nasoseptal flaps rather than a reflexive approach, helps in minimizing postoperative CSF leak rates. Cross-training of neurosurgery graduates focusing on skull base practice is highly recommended for maximizing good outcomes in their early years of practice. With growing experience, intraoperative leak rates tend to decrease, and the reconstruction relies on a tailored multilayer strategy rather than bulky synthetic materials.

改良的分级颅底重建用于内镜鼻内窥镜术中脑脊液泄漏修复:一名外科医生最初几年的实践经验和早期学习曲线的细微差别。
目的:本研究的目的是评估一种改良的分级重建技术的结果,该技术基于术中脑脊液泄漏的大小,该技术是由一名外科医生在其执业的早期进行鼻内窥镜手术的患者。方法:纳入2020年9月至2024年8月期间接受内镜内鼻入路(EEAs)治疗的患者数据库。手术复杂性分为II级、III级和IV级。术中脑脊液泄漏分为4级(0-3级)。患者被分为2个时间线组(在2020年至2022年期间进行EEA的患者[A组]和在2023年至2024年期间进行EEA的患者[B组]),以评估手术复杂性和修复结果的趋势。结果:共发现69例患者,平均年龄56±16.9岁(范围12-83岁);女性34例(49.3%)。体重指数中位数为31(82.6%为25)。病理上以非分泌性大腺瘤最常见(57.9%)。复杂性等级II、III和IV的患者分别有36.2%、46.4%和17.4%进行了EEA。术中1级、2级和3级脑脊液泄漏分别发生在39.1%、7.2%和17.4%的患者中,而36.2%的患者未发生泄漏(0级)。所有1-3级患者均使用脂肪移植和胶原基质。II级复杂性患者仅发生1级和2级泄漏,III级复杂性患者均未发生3级泄漏。4例(5.8%)患者采用鼻中隔皮瓣,均为IV级手术,术中3级泄漏。只有1例患者(1.4%)发生术后脑脊液漏,在翻修手术中仅对该患者(1.4%)使用腰椎引流管。B组2级和3级渗漏率明显低于A组(8.3% vs 33.3%, p = 0.022)。B组临时鼻填充物使用率(8.3%)也显著低于A组(28.9%)(p = 0.049),而高复杂性EEA率和带蒂皮瓣使用率与手术年份无关。结论:分级内镜下鼻内修复方案,结合腰椎引流管和鼻中隔皮瓣的明智使用,而不是反射性入路,有助于减少术后脑脊液泄漏率。强烈建议对神经外科毕业生进行以颅底实践为重点的交叉训练,以便在他们早期的实践中获得最大的好结果。随着经验的增长,术中泄漏率趋于下降,重建依赖于量身定制的多层策略,而不是笨重的合成材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurosurgical focus
Neurosurgical focus CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信