First clinical experiences with the tetravalent live vaccine against dengue (Qdenga®) in travellers: a multicentric TravVacNet study in Germany.

IF 9.1 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Clara Köpke, Camilla Rothe, Andreas Zeder, Gerhard Boecken, Torsten Feldt, Christian Janke, Sabine Jordan, Carsten Köhler, Micha Löbermann, Andreas Müller, Hans Martin Orth, Luise Marie Prüfer-Krämer, Johannes Schäfer, Günther Slesak, August Stich, Sabine Bélard, Nico Thul, Sören L Becker, Sophie Schneitler
{"title":"First clinical experiences with the tetravalent live vaccine against dengue (Qdenga®) in travellers: a multicentric TravVacNet study in Germany.","authors":"Clara Köpke, Camilla Rothe, Andreas Zeder, Gerhard Boecken, Torsten Feldt, Christian Janke, Sabine Jordan, Carsten Köhler, Micha Löbermann, Andreas Müller, Hans Martin Orth, Luise Marie Prüfer-Krämer, Johannes Schäfer, Günther Slesak, August Stich, Sabine Bélard, Nico Thul, Sören L Becker, Sophie Schneitler","doi":"10.1093/jtm/taaf004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of the tetravalent live-attenuated dengue vaccine Qdenga®, which received marketing approval in Germany in 2022. The study evaluated vaccine-related reactions in a predominantly dengue-naïve population, highlighting the importance of post-marketing surveillance as an essential component of safety evaluation for newly licensed vaccines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following dengue vaccination, participants were recruited for an anonymous online questionnaire through the national 'Trav VacNet' network in Germany. The questionnaire focused on post-vaccination reactions up to 18 days after the first and second vaccination, as well as previous travel history and coadministration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 1176 participants, with a median age of 39 years (IQR 28-56), 53.2% female (n = 625), 46.5% male (n = 547), and 0.3% non-binary participants (n = 4). After the first dose, 51% of the participants reported systemic reactions such as headache [40% (190/474)], weakness [40% (189/474)], and malaise [32% (154/474)], which were most pronounced between days 7 and 11 post vaccination. After the second dose, localized signs and symptoms such as pain at the injection site [22% (n = 55/250)] were more common. Fever was more common after the first dose [20% (96/474)] vs. 2% (6/250) after the second. Females reported significantly more reactions than males after both vaccinations (1st dose P = 0.0002; 2nd dose P = 0.0003). A total of 334 (28%) co-administrations were reported whereby assessing adverse events were reported in 47% (157/333) of participants, with the highest prevalence observed when combined with the Japanese encephalitis vaccine [56.8%, (42/74)]. Differences in age groups were observed, with a decrease in reactions in the elderly (≥65 years).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vaccine-related reactions were frequently reported, predominantly after the first dose in dengue-naïve participants. Coadministration was a common strategy without significantly increasing side effects. The study provides important insights into reactogenicity and may help improve vaccination strategies in dengue-naïve populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of travel medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of travel medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taaf004","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of the tetravalent live-attenuated dengue vaccine Qdenga®, which received marketing approval in Germany in 2022. The study evaluated vaccine-related reactions in a predominantly dengue-naïve population, highlighting the importance of post-marketing surveillance as an essential component of safety evaluation for newly licensed vaccines.

Methods: Following dengue vaccination, participants were recruited for an anonymous online questionnaire through the national 'Trav VacNet' network in Germany. The questionnaire focused on post-vaccination reactions up to 18 days after the first and second vaccination, as well as previous travel history and coadministration.

Results: The study included 1176 participants, with a median age of 39 years (IQR 28-56), 53.2% female (n = 625), 46.5% male (n = 547), and 0.3% non-binary participants (n = 4). After the first dose, 51% of the participants reported systemic reactions such as headache [40% (190/474)], weakness [40% (189/474)], and malaise [32% (154/474)], which were most pronounced between days 7 and 11 post vaccination. After the second dose, localized signs and symptoms such as pain at the injection site [22% (n = 55/250)] were more common. Fever was more common after the first dose [20% (96/474)] vs. 2% (6/250) after the second. Females reported significantly more reactions than males after both vaccinations (1st dose P = 0.0002; 2nd dose P = 0.0003). A total of 334 (28%) co-administrations were reported whereby assessing adverse events were reported in 47% (157/333) of participants, with the highest prevalence observed when combined with the Japanese encephalitis vaccine [56.8%, (42/74)]. Differences in age groups were observed, with a decrease in reactions in the elderly (≥65 years).

Conclusions: Vaccine-related reactions were frequently reported, predominantly after the first dose in dengue-naïve participants. Coadministration was a common strategy without significantly increasing side effects. The study provides important insights into reactogenicity and may help improve vaccination strategies in dengue-naïve populations.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of travel medicine
Journal of travel medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
5.10%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Travel Medicine is a publication that focuses on travel medicine and its intersection with other disciplines. It publishes cutting-edge research, consensus papers, policy papers, and expert reviews. The journal is affiliated with the Asia Pacific Travel Health Society. The journal's main areas of interest include the prevention and management of travel-associated infections, non-communicable diseases, vaccines, malaria prevention and treatment, multi-drug resistant pathogens, and surveillance on all individuals crossing international borders. The Journal of Travel Medicine is indexed in multiple major indexing services, including Adis International Ltd., CABI, EBSCOhost, Elsevier BV, Gale, Journal Watch Infectious Diseases (Online), MetaPress, National Library of Medicine, OCLC, Ovid, ProQuest, Thomson Reuters, and the U.S. National Library of Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信