Sophie V Orr, Gavin C Pereira, Blaine A Christiansen
{"title":"Justification of Body Mass Index cutoffs for hip and knee joint arthroplasty among California orthopedic surgeons.","authors":"Sophie V Orr, Gavin C Pereira, Blaine A Christiansen","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05551-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many orthopedic surgeons choose not to perform joint arthroplasty on patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35 or above, citing poorer outcomes and increased procedure risk. Identifying and addressing factors surgeons use to determine procedure BMI cutoffs are necessary to increase access to orthopaedic care for this growing patient population. This will help reduce healthcare disparities while also identifying clinical facilities, equipment, training, and procedures that require improvements to accommodate larger individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed to identify surgeon-specific BMI cutoffs for hip and knee arthroplasty. The survey was circulated within the California Orthopaedic Association (COA) report during March 2023. Questions aimed to identify BMI cutoffs and justifications such as infection risk, co-morbidities, inadequate equipment, and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. Data on decision making about BMI cutoffs and exceptions were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75% of respondents use BMI cutoffs for hip and knee arthroplasty. 91% of respondents indicated they are either wholly or partially responsible for setting procedure BMI cutoffs. Mean hip and knee arthroplasty BMI cutoffs were 40.5 and 41, respectively. Four categories for BMI cutoff justifications were identified: (1) risk of complications; (2) surgery logistics; (3) concerns about facilities or resources; and (4) surgeon perception.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BMI-based justifications for denial of care define key addressable areas of improvement that can increase access to care for life-changing orthopaedic surgeries such as THA and TKA. Insight from the queried surgeons will help drive future research areas to address this need.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783723/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05551-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Many orthopedic surgeons choose not to perform joint arthroplasty on patients with a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 35 or above, citing poorer outcomes and increased procedure risk. Identifying and addressing factors surgeons use to determine procedure BMI cutoffs are necessary to increase access to orthopaedic care for this growing patient population. This will help reduce healthcare disparities while also identifying clinical facilities, equipment, training, and procedures that require improvements to accommodate larger individuals.
Methods: Orthopaedic surgeons were surveyed to identify surgeon-specific BMI cutoffs for hip and knee arthroplasty. The survey was circulated within the California Orthopaedic Association (COA) report during March 2023. Questions aimed to identify BMI cutoffs and justifications such as infection risk, co-morbidities, inadequate equipment, and the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) guidelines. Data on decision making about BMI cutoffs and exceptions were also collected.
Results: 75% of respondents use BMI cutoffs for hip and knee arthroplasty. 91% of respondents indicated they are either wholly or partially responsible for setting procedure BMI cutoffs. Mean hip and knee arthroplasty BMI cutoffs were 40.5 and 41, respectively. Four categories for BMI cutoff justifications were identified: (1) risk of complications; (2) surgery logistics; (3) concerns about facilities or resources; and (4) surgeon perception.
Conclusions: BMI-based justifications for denial of care define key addressable areas of improvement that can increase access to care for life-changing orthopaedic surgeries such as THA and TKA. Insight from the queried surgeons will help drive future research areas to address this need.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues.
Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications.
JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.