Nomograms for predicting risk and prognosis of liver metastases in ovarian cancer patients

IF 1.7 4区医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102918

Feng Jiang , Chunfang Yao

{"title":"Nomograms for predicting risk and prognosis of liver metastases in ovarian cancer patients","authors":"Feng Jiang , Chunfang Yao","doi":"10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><div>Liver metastases (LiM) commonly manifest in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. We intended to establish nomograms for predicting the risk and prognostic factors in OCLiM patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data from the SEER database (Nov 2022, Sub 1992–2020) were analyzed, excluding patients with missing data on liver metastases, survival months, race, AJCC T stage, marital status, rural/urban status, and metastases to bone, brain, or lung. Logistic and Cox regression analyses identified risk and prognostic factors for liver metastases. Predictive nomograms were developed from the multivariable regression results. The nomograms were evaluated using Harrell's C-index, ROC curve, calibration curve, DCA, NRI, and IDI. Moreover, the efficacy of the treatment in the new risk stratification subgroups was demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 17,056 OC patients, 5.67% (<em>n</em> = 967) had liver metastases. Nomograms were constructed based on identified risk and prognostic factors, with dynamic web-based nomograms developed for clinical use. The nomogram demonstrated C-index values of 81.9% (training) and 82.9% (validation) for predicting liver metastases. For OS and CSS, the C-index values were 73.3% and 73.7% (training), and 73.3% and 72.8% (validation), respectively. The ROC curves for OS at 1-, 3-, 5-year showed AUC values of 84.1%, 79.8%, 75.9% (training) and 82.9%, 78.5%, 82.2% (validation), respectively. For CSS, AUC values at 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 84.5%, 80.2%, 76.1% (training) and 82.6%, 78.0, 82.0% (validation), respectively. The calibration and DCA curves confirmed favorable performance. NRI and IDI analyses showed superiority over the Grade and AJCC stage systems. Surgery improved prognosis in the low-risk group, while chemotherapy was more effective in both low- and medium-risk groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>we developed nomograms and risk stratification systems to assist clinicians in the individualized prediction, risk stratification, and prognostic assessment of OCLiM patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","volume":"54 4","pages":"Article 102918"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468784725000157","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

Liver metastases (LiM) commonly manifest in ovarian cancer (OC) patients. We intended to establish nomograms for predicting the risk and prognostic factors in OCLiM patients.

Methods

Data from the SEER database (Nov 2022, Sub 1992–2020) were analyzed, excluding patients with missing data on liver metastases, survival months, race, AJCC T stage, marital status, rural/urban status, and metastases to bone, brain, or lung. Logistic and Cox regression analyses identified risk and prognostic factors for liver metastases. Predictive nomograms were developed from the multivariable regression results. The nomograms were evaluated using Harrell's C-index, ROC curve, calibration curve, DCA, NRI, and IDI. Moreover, the efficacy of the treatment in the new risk stratification subgroups was demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves.

Results

Among 17,056 OC patients, 5.67% (n = 967) had liver metastases. Nomograms were constructed based on identified risk and prognostic factors, with dynamic web-based nomograms developed for clinical use. The nomogram demonstrated C-index values of 81.9% (training) and 82.9% (validation) for predicting liver metastases. For OS and CSS, the C-index values were 73.3% and 73.7% (training), and 73.3% and 72.8% (validation), respectively. The ROC curves for OS at 1-, 3-, 5-year showed AUC values of 84.1%, 79.8%, 75.9% (training) and 82.9%, 78.5%, 82.2% (validation), respectively. For CSS, AUC values at 1-, 3-, and 5-year were 84.5%, 80.2%, 76.1% (training) and 82.6%, 78.0, 82.0% (validation), respectively. The calibration and DCA curves confirmed favorable performance. NRI and IDI analyses showed superiority over the Grade and AJCC stage systems. Surgery improved prognosis in the low-risk group, while chemotherapy was more effective in both low- and medium-risk groups.

Conclusions

we developed nomograms and risk stratification systems to assist clinicians in the individualized prediction, risk stratification, and prognostic assessment of OCLiM patients.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology

CiteScore

3.70

自引率

5.30%

发文量

210

审稿时长

31 days

期刊介绍： Formerly known as Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction is the official Academic publication of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (Collège National des Gynécologues et Obstétriciens Français / CNGOF). J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod publishes monthly, in English, research papers and techniques in the fields of Gynecology, Obstetrics, Neonatology and Human Reproduction: (guest) editorials, original articles, reviews, updates, technical notes, case reports, letters to the editor and guidelines. Original works include clinical or laboratory investigations and clinical or equipment reports. Reviews include narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses.