MELD-Lactate as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with variceal gastrointestinal bleeding.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Sofía Rodríguez-Jacobo, Raúl A Jiménez-Castillo, Carlos A Cortez-Hernández, Joel O Jaquez-Quintana, José A González-González, Héctor J Maldonado-Garza
{"title":"MELD-Lactate as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with variceal gastrointestinal bleeding.","authors":"Sofía Rodríguez-Jacobo, Raúl A Jiménez-Castillo, Carlos A Cortez-Hernández, Joel O Jaquez-Quintana, José A González-González, Héctor J Maldonado-Garza","doi":"10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common cause of decompensation in patients with liver cirrhosis. While mortality data, which are from 10 to 15%, are available, there are no validated scales to predict in-hospital mortality in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether the MELD-Lactate (MELD-LA) level is associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic liver disease who are admitted for variceal bleeding.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective, observational, and analytical study was conducted that included 120 patients. The MELD-LA cut-off point was obtained, and in-hospital mortality was obtained using conventional prognostic scales that had the highest sensitivity and specificity for comparison purposes. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed using the MELD-LA cut-off point obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our cohort, 6 (5.0%) patients died during hospitalization. Patients who died had a mean MELD-LA value of 20.0 (±4.97) as opposed to those who did not die, 13.62 (±3.29), (p<0.001). The MELD-LA cut-off point of >14.0, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 71.0%, a positive predictive value of 15.4%, a negative predictive value of 100.0%, and an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.886, was most well correlated with higher in-hospital mortality. Survival was 71.1% in patients with MELD-LA levels>14.0 versus 100.0% in those with lower levels (p=0.001) during hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The measurement of MELD-LA at admission seems to be a good complementary marker for the evaluation and prognosis of in-hospital mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis, and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":12802,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","volume":" ","pages":"502369"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterologia y hepatologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gastrohep.2025.502369","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common cause of decompensation in patients with liver cirrhosis. While mortality data, which are from 10 to 15%, are available, there are no validated scales to predict in-hospital mortality in this patient population.

Objective: To determine whether the MELD-Lactate (MELD-LA) level is associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic liver disease who are admitted for variceal bleeding.

Material and methods: A prospective, observational, and analytical study was conducted that included 120 patients. The MELD-LA cut-off point was obtained, and in-hospital mortality was obtained using conventional prognostic scales that had the highest sensitivity and specificity for comparison purposes. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed using the MELD-LA cut-off point obtained.

Results: In our cohort, 6 (5.0%) patients died during hospitalization. Patients who died had a mean MELD-LA value of 20.0 (±4.97) as opposed to those who did not die, 13.62 (±3.29), (p<0.001). The MELD-LA cut-off point of >14.0, with a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 71.0%, a positive predictive value of 15.4%, a negative predictive value of 100.0%, and an AUC (area under the curve) of 0.886, was most well correlated with higher in-hospital mortality. Survival was 71.1% in patients with MELD-LA levels>14.0 versus 100.0% in those with lower levels (p=0.001) during hospitalization.

Conclusion: The measurement of MELD-LA at admission seems to be a good complementary marker for the evaluation and prognosis of in-hospital mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis, and variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

meld -乳酸作为静脉曲张性消化道出血患者住院死亡率的预测因子
简介:上消化道静脉曲张出血是肝硬化患者代偿失代偿的常见原因。虽然有10%至15%的死亡率数据,但没有有效的量表来预测这一患者群体的住院死亡率。目的:确定meld -乳酸(MELD-LA)水平是否与因静脉曲张出血入院的慢性肝病患者住院死亡率相关。材料和方法:对120例患者进行前瞻性、观察性和分析性研究。获得MELD-LA分界点,并使用具有最高敏感性和特异性的常规预后量表获得院内死亡率,以便进行比较。此外,使用获得的MELD-LA分界点进行生存分析。结果:在我们的队列中,6例(5.0%)患者在住院期间死亡。死亡患者的平均MELD-LA值为20.0(±4.97),而未死亡患者为13.62(±3.29),(p 14.0),敏感性为100%,特异性为71.0%,阳性预测值为15.4%,阴性预测值为100.0%,AUC(曲线下面积)为0.886,与较高的住院死亡率相关性最强。在住院期间,MELD-LA水平为bb0 - 14.0的患者的生存率为71.1%,而低水平患者的生存率为100.0% (p=0.001)。结论:入院时测量MELD-LA可作为评价肝硬化、上消化道静脉曲张出血患者住院死亡率及预后的良好补充指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia
Gastroenterologia y hepatologia GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Gastroenterology and Hepatology is the first journal to cover the latest advances in pathology of the gastrointestinal tract, liver, pancreas, and bile ducts, making it an indispensable tool for gastroenterologists, hepatologists, internists and general practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信