Predictors of higher pain in possible open globe injury emergency medical services activations.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hassaam S Choudhry, David Mothy, Aneesh Reddy, Aman M Patel, Skyler Peterson, Benjamin Fisher, Mohammad H Dastjerdi
{"title":"Predictors of higher pain in possible open globe injury emergency medical services activations.","authors":"Hassaam S Choudhry, David Mothy, Aneesh Reddy, Aman M Patel, Skyler Peterson, Benjamin Fisher, Mohammad H Dastjerdi","doi":"10.1007/s10792-025-03418-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine predictors of high pain in open globe injury (OGI) cases treated and transported by Emergency Medical Services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The National Emergency Medical Services Information System database was queried for activations of OGI between 2017 and 2021. Demographic, location, medication, and date and time information was collected. Cases were divided based on the intensity of maximum pain reported (low pain: below 5/10, high pain: above 5/10). Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of high maximum pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 53,589 cases of OGI, 20,766 reported high levels of pain. Females were more likely to report high pain than males (OR 1.24, CI 1.195-1.285). All age groups between 16 and 75 years old were more likely to report high pain than patients below 15, while all age groups above 75 were less likely. American Indians/Alaska Natives, Black, and Hispanic Americans were all more likely to report high pain than White Americans (American Indian, OR 1.249, CI 1.067-1.461; Black, OR 1.332, CI 1.277-1.390; Hispanic, OR 1.133, CI 1.064-1.207). OGI cases in the Midwest and South regions were less likely to report high pain than those in the West (Midwest, OR 0.868, CI 0.807-0.933; South, OR 0.800, CI 0.748-0.855). Compared to low pain patients, a greater percentage of high pain patients received opioid analgesia (10.04% vs. 0.44%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Demographic factors and location may contribute to higher pain in OGI patients. This information may prove useful in the management of OGI and may warrant further investigation into the nature of open globe trauma.Kindly check and confirm the inserted city is correct for affiliation 3.Correct.</p>","PeriodicalId":14473,"journal":{"name":"International Ophthalmology","volume":"45 1","pages":"53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11785623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-025-03418-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine predictors of high pain in open globe injury (OGI) cases treated and transported by Emergency Medical Services.

Methods: The National Emergency Medical Services Information System database was queried for activations of OGI between 2017 and 2021. Demographic, location, medication, and date and time information was collected. Cases were divided based on the intensity of maximum pain reported (low pain: below 5/10, high pain: above 5/10). Logistic regression was used to identify significant predictors of high maximum pain.

Results: Of 53,589 cases of OGI, 20,766 reported high levels of pain. Females were more likely to report high pain than males (OR 1.24, CI 1.195-1.285). All age groups between 16 and 75 years old were more likely to report high pain than patients below 15, while all age groups above 75 were less likely. American Indians/Alaska Natives, Black, and Hispanic Americans were all more likely to report high pain than White Americans (American Indian, OR 1.249, CI 1.067-1.461; Black, OR 1.332, CI 1.277-1.390; Hispanic, OR 1.133, CI 1.064-1.207). OGI cases in the Midwest and South regions were less likely to report high pain than those in the West (Midwest, OR 0.868, CI 0.807-0.933; South, OR 0.800, CI 0.748-0.855). Compared to low pain patients, a greater percentage of high pain patients received opioid analgesia (10.04% vs. 0.44%).

Conclusions: Demographic factors and location may contribute to higher pain in OGI patients. This information may prove useful in the management of OGI and may warrant further investigation into the nature of open globe trauma.Kindly check and confirm the inserted city is correct for affiliation 3.Correct.

在可能的开放性损伤紧急医疗服务激活中较高疼痛的预测因素。
目的:确定经急诊医疗服务治疗和运送的开放性球损伤(OGI)患者高度疼痛的预测因素。方法:查询国家紧急医疗服务信息系统数据库2017 - 2021年OGI激活情况。收集了人口统计、地点、用药、日期和时间信息。病例根据报告的最大疼痛强度进行划分(低痛:低于5/10,高痛:高于5/10)。使用逻辑回归来确定高最大疼痛的显著预测因子。结果:在53589例OGI中,20766例报告了高水平的疼痛。女性比男性更有可能报告高疼痛(OR 1.24, CI 1.195-1.285)。所有年龄在16到75岁之间的患者比15岁以下的患者更有可能报告高疼痛,而所有年龄在75岁以上的患者则不太可能报告高疼痛。美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民、黑人和西班牙裔美国人都比白人更有可能报告高度疼痛(美洲印第安人,OR 1.249, CI 1.067-1.461;黑色,OR 1.332, CI 1.277-1.390;西班牙裔,OR 1.133, CI 1.064-1.207)。中西部和南部地区的OGI病例报告高疼痛的可能性低于西部地区(中西部,OR 0.868, CI 0.807-0.933;南方,OR 0.800, CI 0.748-0.855)。与低痛患者相比,高痛患者接受阿片类镇痛的比例更高(10.04%比0.44%)。结论:人口统计学因素和地理位置可能导致OGI患者疼痛加重。这一信息可能对OGI的治疗有用,并有必要进一步研究开放性球体创伤的性质。请检查并确认所插入的城市是否正确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
451
期刊介绍: International Ophthalmology provides the clinician with articles on all the relevant subspecialties of ophthalmology, with a broad international scope. The emphasis is on presentation of the latest clinical research in the field. In addition, the journal includes regular sections devoted to new developments in technologies, products, and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信