Influence of Multiband Technique on Temporal Diffusion Spectroscopy and Its Diagnostic Value in Breast Tumors.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jie Ding, Zhen Zhang, Hongyan Xiao, Lijia Zhi, Xiuzheng Yue, Dazhi Chen, Rongrong Zhu, Lili Yang, Chao You, Yajia Gu
{"title":"Influence of Multiband Technique on Temporal Diffusion Spectroscopy and Its Diagnostic Value in Breast Tumors.","authors":"Jie Ding, Zhen Zhang, Hongyan Xiao, Lijia Zhi, Xiuzheng Yue, Dazhi Chen, Rongrong Zhu, Lili Yang, Chao You, Yajia Gu","doi":"10.1002/jmri.29715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporal diffusion spectroscopy (TDS) is a noninvasive diffusion imaging technique used to characterizing cellular microstructures. The influence of multiband (MB) on TDS, particularly in breast tumor imaging remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the influence of MB on TDS in terms of scanning time, image quality, and quantitative parameters and to assess the diagnostic value of TDS with MB in breast tumors.</p><p><strong>Study type: </strong>Prospective.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Seventy-one women with 71 confirmed lesions.</p><p><strong>Field strength/sequence: </strong>3.0 T; oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE), OGSE with MB, and pulsed gradient spin-echo, and routine magnetic resonance imaging squences.</p><p><strong>Assessment: </strong>TDS with MB was used to assess diagnostic efficacy in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. A comparison of scanning time and image quality was performed in 17 patients. Imaging parameters were analyzed using limited spectrally edited diffusion (IMPULSED) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were compared between MB and non-MB protocols. The cell diameter from TDS was compared with histopathological measurements in 21 patients.</p><p><strong>Statistical tests: </strong>Bland-Altman plot, paired t test, Mann-Whitney U test, kappa test, DeLong's test, intraclass correlation coefficient agreement, receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve (AUC), and simple linear regression, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The TDS with MB protocol had a shorter average scanning time than that without MB protocol (7 minutes 22 seconds vs. 12 minutes 28 seconds); image quality was improved by reducing image artifacts. Most IMPULSED parameters and ADC values did not significantly differ between the MB and non-MB protocols (P = 0.23, P = 0.17). The IMPULSED parameters of cellularity and intracellular volume fraction achieved the highest AUC values for distinguishing breast tumors (0.865 and 0.821, respectively), surpassing the diagnostic efficiency of conventional ADC-1000 (0.776). The correlation between IMPULSED parameters and microscopic cell size was strong (r = 0.842).</p><p><strong>Data conclusion: </strong>The MB technique improved the TDS protocol's efficiency and reduced the image artifacts. TDS parameters correlated with pathological findings and showed good performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast tumors.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>We explored the impact of simultaneous multislice acquisition technology on temporal diffusion spectroscopy (TDS) and whether combining this method could help distinguish benign from malignant breast tumors. Our findings showed that simultaneous multislice acquisition technology shortened the scanning time and improved image quality by reducing motion-related issues. Additionally, measurements of cell size using simultaneous multislice acquisition technology matched well with results from pathology tests. Overall, our study suggests that simultaneous multislice acquisition enhanced TDS could make breast cancer diagnosis more accurate and efficient, offering good advantages compared to conventional imaging methods.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.</p>","PeriodicalId":16140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.29715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Temporal diffusion spectroscopy (TDS) is a noninvasive diffusion imaging technique used to characterizing cellular microstructures. The influence of multiband (MB) on TDS, particularly in breast tumor imaging remain unknown.

Purpose: To investigate the influence of MB on TDS in terms of scanning time, image quality, and quantitative parameters and to assess the diagnostic value of TDS with MB in breast tumors.

Study type: Prospective.

Population: Seventy-one women with 71 confirmed lesions.

Field strength/sequence: 3.0 T; oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE), OGSE with MB, and pulsed gradient spin-echo, and routine magnetic resonance imaging squences.

Assessment: TDS with MB was used to assess diagnostic efficacy in differentiating benign and malignant tumors. A comparison of scanning time and image quality was performed in 17 patients. Imaging parameters were analyzed using limited spectrally edited diffusion (IMPULSED) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were compared between MB and non-MB protocols. The cell diameter from TDS was compared with histopathological measurements in 21 patients.

Statistical tests: Bland-Altman plot, paired t test, Mann-Whitney U test, kappa test, DeLong's test, intraclass correlation coefficient agreement, receiver operating characteristic curve, area under the curve (AUC), and simple linear regression, with statistical significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: The TDS with MB protocol had a shorter average scanning time than that without MB protocol (7 minutes 22 seconds vs. 12 minutes 28 seconds); image quality was improved by reducing image artifacts. Most IMPULSED parameters and ADC values did not significantly differ between the MB and non-MB protocols (P = 0.23, P = 0.17). The IMPULSED parameters of cellularity and intracellular volume fraction achieved the highest AUC values for distinguishing breast tumors (0.865 and 0.821, respectively), surpassing the diagnostic efficiency of conventional ADC-1000 (0.776). The correlation between IMPULSED parameters and microscopic cell size was strong (r = 0.842).

Data conclusion: The MB technique improved the TDS protocol's efficiency and reduced the image artifacts. TDS parameters correlated with pathological findings and showed good performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast tumors.

Plain language summary: We explored the impact of simultaneous multislice acquisition technology on temporal diffusion spectroscopy (TDS) and whether combining this method could help distinguish benign from malignant breast tumors. Our findings showed that simultaneous multislice acquisition technology shortened the scanning time and improved image quality by reducing motion-related issues. Additionally, measurements of cell size using simultaneous multislice acquisition technology matched well with results from pathology tests. Overall, our study suggests that simultaneous multislice acquisition enhanced TDS could make breast cancer diagnosis more accurate and efficient, offering good advantages compared to conventional imaging methods.

Level of evidence: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

多波段技术对时间扩散光谱的影响及其对乳腺肿瘤的诊断价值。
背景:时间扩散光谱(TDS)是一种用于表征细胞微观结构的非侵入性扩散成像技术。多波段(MB)对TDS的影响,特别是对乳腺肿瘤成像的影响尚不清楚。目的:探讨MB对TDS在扫描时间、图像质量、定量参数等方面的影响,评价TDS合并MB对乳腺肿瘤的诊断价值。研究类型:前瞻性。人群:71名女性,71例确诊病变。场强/序列:3.0 T;振荡梯度自旋回波(OGSE)、带MB的OGSE和脉冲梯度自旋回波,以及常规磁共振成像序列。评价:采用TDS联合MB评价诊断良恶性肿瘤的疗效。比较17例患者的扫描时间和图像质量。使用有限光谱编辑扩散(impulse)分析成像参数,并比较MB和非MB协议的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。将21例患者的TDS细胞直径与组织病理学测量结果进行比较。统计学检验:Bland-Altman图、配对t检验、Mann-Whitney U检验、kappa检验、DeLong’s检验、类内相关系数一致性、受者工作特征曲线、曲线下面积(AUC)、简单线性回归,统计学意义设为P。结果:采用MB方案的TDS平均扫描时间短于未采用MB方案的TDS(7分22秒比12分28秒);通过减少图像伪影,提高了图像质量。大多数脉冲参数和ADC值在MB和非MB协议之间没有显著差异(P = 0.23, P = 0.17)。细胞密度和细胞内体积分数的pulsed参数对乳腺肿瘤的AUC值最高(分别为0.865和0.821),超过了常规ADC-1000的诊断效率(0.776)。脉冲参数与显微细胞大小有很强的相关性(r = 0.842)。数据结论:MB技术提高了TDS协议的效率,减少了图像伪影。TDS参数与病理表现相关,在乳腺肿瘤良恶性鉴别中表现良好。摘要:我们探讨了同时多层采集技术对时间扩散光谱(TDS)的影响,以及结合这种方法是否有助于区分乳腺肿瘤的良恶性。我们的研究结果表明,同时多片采集技术通过减少运动相关问题,缩短了扫描时间,提高了图像质量。此外,使用同时多层采集技术测量的细胞大小与病理测试的结果相匹配。综上所述,我们的研究表明,同时多层采集增强TDS可以使乳腺癌诊断更加准确和高效,与传统成像方法相比具有良好的优势。证据水平:2技术功效:第2阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.80%
发文量
494
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (JMRI) is an international journal devoted to the timely publication of basic and clinical research, educational and review articles, and other information related to the diagnostic applications of magnetic resonance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信