Marlies N. van Lingen , Noor A.A. Giesbertz , Karin R. Jongsma
{"title":"Digital technologies in genetic counseling: Recommendations for a morally sound integration","authors":"Marlies N. van Lingen , Noor A.A. Giesbertz , Karin R. Jongsma","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101370","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address the increasing demand for clinical genetic counseling, digital technologies are currently being developed to increase efficiency and overcome logistical and societal barriers in genetic health care. However, it is not self-evident that genetic technologies will improve the quality of and access to genetic counseling. Moreover, several ethical questions about the appropriate tasks of digital technologies in the genetic care process have been raised, particularly when personal contact is supplemented or even replaced with digital technologies. Ethical reflections on the introduction of digital resources in genetic counseling are scarce. Here, we reflect on 3 central domains in which promises of the digitalization of genetic counseling are generally discussed: (1) promoting patient autonomy and patient-centered care, (2) increasing efficiency, and (3) increasing accessibility. We argue that the benefits of digitalization are not self-evident and are paired with challenges. We conclude by offering 4 recommendations to promote the ethically sound development of digital technologies in genetic health care: (1) specify the intended tasks and expected benefits of the digital technology, (2) identify potential challenges of digitalization, (3) consider the role of end users within the genetic care process, and (4) ensure iterative stakeholder consultation and engagement.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 101370"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360025000176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To address the increasing demand for clinical genetic counseling, digital technologies are currently being developed to increase efficiency and overcome logistical and societal barriers in genetic health care. However, it is not self-evident that genetic technologies will improve the quality of and access to genetic counseling. Moreover, several ethical questions about the appropriate tasks of digital technologies in the genetic care process have been raised, particularly when personal contact is supplemented or even replaced with digital technologies. Ethical reflections on the introduction of digital resources in genetic counseling are scarce. Here, we reflect on 3 central domains in which promises of the digitalization of genetic counseling are generally discussed: (1) promoting patient autonomy and patient-centered care, (2) increasing efficiency, and (3) increasing accessibility. We argue that the benefits of digitalization are not self-evident and are paired with challenges. We conclude by offering 4 recommendations to promote the ethically sound development of digital technologies in genetic health care: (1) specify the intended tasks and expected benefits of the digital technology, (2) identify potential challenges of digitalization, (3) consider the role of end users within the genetic care process, and (4) ensure iterative stakeholder consultation and engagement.
期刊介绍:
Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health.
GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.