“All doctors should be trained in that”: The coproduction and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic health care for people with intellectual disability
Iva Strnadová , Manjekah Dunn , Chloe Molnar , Julie Loblinzk Refalo , Jackie Leach Scully , Joanne Danker , Michelle Tso , Tiffany Qing Lim , Yasmin Cathcart-King , Karen-Maia Jackaman , Sarah Hayes , Sierra Angelina Willow , Jackie Boyle , Jennifer Hansen , Skie Sarfaraz , Caroline Basckin , Celia Halliburton , Thulasee Sri Ganeshan , Edwina K. Middleton , Bronwyn Terrill , Elizabeth Emma Palmer
{"title":"“All doctors should be trained in that”: The coproduction and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic health care for people with intellectual disability","authors":"Iva Strnadová , Manjekah Dunn , Chloe Molnar , Julie Loblinzk Refalo , Jackie Leach Scully , Joanne Danker , Michelle Tso , Tiffany Qing Lim , Yasmin Cathcart-King , Karen-Maia Jackaman , Sarah Hayes , Sierra Angelina Willow , Jackie Boyle , Jennifer Hansen , Skie Sarfaraz , Caroline Basckin , Celia Halliburton , Thulasee Sri Ganeshan , Edwina K. Middleton , Bronwyn Terrill , Elizabeth Emma Palmer","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic health care. However, they are keen to understand genetic health care and recommend that clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multimodal genetic health literacy resources should be coproduced.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our inclusive research team applied best-practice coproduction principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation, including surveys and focus group/interviews, assessed (1) clinicians’ perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive health care for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (2) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (3) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (4) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the coproduction process.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians, and had a global reach. Coproduction was feasible and judged as critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Coproduction can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability, potentially reducing health inequity and improving the safety and quality of genetic health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 101371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360025000188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic health care. However, they are keen to understand genetic health care and recommend that clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multimodal genetic health literacy resources should be coproduced.
Methods
Our inclusive research team applied best-practice coproduction principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation, including surveys and focus group/interviews, assessed (1) clinicians’ perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive health care for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (2) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (3) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (4) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the coproduction process.
Results
The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians, and had a global reach. Coproduction was feasible and judged as critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.
Conclusion
Coproduction can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability, potentially reducing health inequity and improving the safety and quality of genetic health care.
期刊介绍:
Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health.
GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.