“All doctors should be trained in that”: The coproduction and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic health care for people with intellectual disability

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Iva Strnadová , Manjekah Dunn , Chloe Molnar , Julie Loblinzk Refalo , Jackie Leach Scully , Joanne Danker , Michelle Tso , Tiffany Qing Lim , Yasmin Cathcart-King , Karen-Maia Jackaman , Sarah Hayes , Sierra Angelina Willow , Jackie Boyle , Jennifer Hansen , Skie Sarfaraz , Caroline Basckin , Celia Halliburton , Thulasee Sri Ganeshan , Edwina K. Middleton , Bronwyn Terrill , Elizabeth Emma Palmer
{"title":"“All doctors should be trained in that”: The coproduction and mixed-methods evaluation of an educational toolkit to enable safe, high-quality genetic health care for people with intellectual disability","authors":"Iva Strnadová ,&nbsp;Manjekah Dunn ,&nbsp;Chloe Molnar ,&nbsp;Julie Loblinzk Refalo ,&nbsp;Jackie Leach Scully ,&nbsp;Joanne Danker ,&nbsp;Michelle Tso ,&nbsp;Tiffany Qing Lim ,&nbsp;Yasmin Cathcart-King ,&nbsp;Karen-Maia Jackaman ,&nbsp;Sarah Hayes ,&nbsp;Sierra Angelina Willow ,&nbsp;Jackie Boyle ,&nbsp;Jennifer Hansen ,&nbsp;Skie Sarfaraz ,&nbsp;Caroline Basckin ,&nbsp;Celia Halliburton ,&nbsp;Thulasee Sri Ganeshan ,&nbsp;Edwina K. Middleton ,&nbsp;Bronwyn Terrill ,&nbsp;Elizabeth Emma Palmer","doi":"10.1016/j.gim.2025.101371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic health care. However, they are keen to understand genetic health care and recommend that clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multimodal genetic health literacy resources should be coproduced.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Our inclusive research team applied best-practice coproduction principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation, including surveys and focus group/interviews, assessed (1) clinicians’ perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive health care for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (2) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (3) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (4) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the coproduction process.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians, and had a global reach. Coproduction was feasible and judged as critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Coproduction can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability, potentially reducing health inequity and improving the safety and quality of genetic health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12717,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine","volume":"27 4","pages":"Article 101371"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1098360025000188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

People with intellectual disability inequitably access high-quality genetic health care. However, they are keen to understand genetic health care and recommend that clinicians need education on delivering more inclusive care and that multimodal genetic health literacy resources should be coproduced.

Methods

Our inclusive research team applied best-practice coproduction principles to deliver a suite of resources, the GeneEQUAL Toolkit. Mixed-methods evaluation, including surveys and focus group/interviews, assessed (1) clinicians’ perceived capabilities, motivation, and opportunities for providing inclusive health care for people with intellectual disability before and after exploring the Toolkit; (2) the perceptions and opinions of people with intellectual disability about the Toolkit; (3) the reach of the Toolkit components; and (4) the reflections of people with intellectual disability and clinicians on the coproduction process.

Results

The Toolkit met the expectations and preferences of people with intellectual disability and clinicians, and had a global reach. Coproduction was feasible and judged as critical for the high value of the Toolkit, in motivating clinicians to change their clinical practice and empowering people with intellectual disability.

Conclusion

Coproduction can be successfully applied to improve the engagement of people with intellectual disability, potentially reducing health inequity and improving the safety and quality of genetic health care.
“所有医生都应接受这方面的培训”:联合制作和混合方法评估一套教育工具包,以便为智力残疾者提供安全、高质量的遗传保健。
目的:智力残疾者不公平地获得高质量的遗传保健。然而,他们渴望更多地了解遗传保健,并建议临床医生需要接受关于提供更具包容性的护理的教育,并且应该共同制作多模式遗传健康素养资源。方法:我们的包容性研究团队应用最佳实践合作生产原则,提供了一套资源,即GeneEQUAL工具包。包括调查和焦点小组/访谈在内的混合方法评估(i)临床医生在探索工具包之前和之后为智障人士提供包容性医疗保健的感知能力、动机和机会;(ii)智障人士对工具包的看法和意见;(iii)工具包组件的覆盖范围;(四)智障人士和临床医生对合作制作过程的反思。结果:该工具包满足了智障人士和临床医生的期望和偏好,并具有全球影响力。合作制作是可行的,并且对于工具包的高价值至关重要,可以激励临床医生改变他们的临床实践并赋予智障人士权力。结论:合作生产可以成功地应用于提高智力残疾者的参与,并有可能减少健康不平等,提高遗传保健的安全性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Genetics in Medicine
Genetics in Medicine 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
6.80%
发文量
857
审稿时长
1.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Genetics in Medicine (GIM) is the official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. The journal''s mission is to enhance the knowledge, understanding, and practice of medical genetics and genomics through publications in clinical and laboratory genetics and genomics, including ethical, legal, and social issues as well as public health. GIM encourages research that combats racism, includes diverse populations and is written by authors from diverse and underrepresented backgrounds.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信