Do implant overdentures improve chewing ability and quality of life despite no effect on nutritional status?

Q3 Dentistry

Evidence-based dentistry Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1038/s41432-025-01107-w

Nithya Nandhini, Praveen Chandrashekaraiah, Reshma Benzigar, Ramya Shivananjan, A Selva Arockiam

{"title":"Do implant overdentures improve chewing ability and quality of life despite no effect on nutritional status?","authors":"Nithya Nandhini, Praveen Chandrashekaraiah, Reshma Benzigar, Ramya Shivananjan, A Selva Arockiam","doi":"10.1038/s41432-025-01107-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data sources: This prospective study involved 35 edentulous adults aged 50 years and older, treated at a dental clinic. Data were collected across four time points: baseline (T0), 3 months post-application of conventional complete dentures (CD; T1), and 3 and 6 months after the transition to implant-supported overdentures (IOD; T2 and T3). Patient outcomes were assessed using: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA): To evaluate nutritional status, Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14): To measure oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and Chewing Ability Questionnaire: To document functional improvements.Results: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores declined initially after transitioning to CDs (T0-T1) but stabilized following implant overdenture placement. Significant improvements were reported, with chewing difficulty decreasing from 91.4% at baseline to 51.4% at T3. Marked enhancements in OHIP-14 scores at T2 and T3, indicating better oral health perception.Conclusion: While implant overdentures significantly improved chewing ability and quality of life, they did not lead to measurable improvements in nutritional status. The findings highlight the functional and psychosocial benefits of implant overdentures for older adults, suggesting that oral rehabilitation enhances overall well-being even without direct nutritional effects. This study provides a moderate level of evidence based on its prospective design, validated outcome measures, and clear findings related to chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life. However, the small sample size, lack of long-term follow-up, and absence of significant improvements in nutritional status suggest the need for further research to validate and strengthen these findings. Future studies with larger populations and extended observation perimplant overdentures are essential to enhance the robustness and generalizability of the evidence.","PeriodicalId":12234,"journal":{"name":"Evidence-based dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence-based dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41432-025-01107-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Data sources: This prospective study involved 35 edentulous adults aged 50 years and older, treated at a dental clinic. Data were collected across four time points: baseline (T0), 3 months post-application of conventional complete dentures (CD; T1), and 3 and 6 months after the transition to implant-supported overdentures (IOD; T2 and T3). Patient outcomes were assessed using: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA): To evaluate nutritional status, Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14): To measure oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and Chewing Ability Questionnaire: To document functional improvements.

Results: Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores declined initially after transitioning to CDs (T0-T1) but stabilized following implant overdenture placement. Significant improvements were reported, with chewing difficulty decreasing from 91.4% at baseline to 51.4% at T3. Marked enhancements in OHIP-14 scores at T2 and T3, indicating better oral health perception.

Conclusion: While implant overdentures significantly improved chewing ability and quality of life, they did not lead to measurable improvements in nutritional status. The findings highlight the functional and psychosocial benefits of implant overdentures for older adults, suggesting that oral rehabilitation enhances overall well-being even without direct nutritional effects. This study provides a moderate level of evidence based on its prospective design, validated outcome measures, and clear findings related to chewing ability and oral health-related quality of life. However, the small sample size, lack of long-term follow-up, and absence of significant improvements in nutritional status suggest the need for further research to validate and strengthen these findings. Future studies with larger populations and extended observation perimplant overdentures are essential to enhance the robustness and generalizability of the evidence.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Evidence-based dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Evidence-Based Dentistry delivers the best available evidence on the latest developments in oral health. We evaluate the evidence and provide guidance concerning the value of the author''s conclusions. We keep dentistry up to date with new approaches, exploring a wide range of the latest developments through an accessible expert commentary. Original papers and relevant publications are condensed into digestible summaries, drawing attention to the current methods and findings. We are a central resource for the most cutting edge and relevant issues concerning the evidence-based approach in dentistry today. Evidence-Based Dentistry is published by Springer Nature on behalf of the British Dental Association.