The Comparative Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management of Cardiogenic Shock Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Advanced Heart Failure
Varinder K. Randhawa MD, PhD , David A. Baran MD , Manreet K. Kanwar MD , Jaime A. Hernandez-Montfort MD, MPH, MSc , Shashank S. Sinha MD, MSc , Christopher F. Barnett MD, MPH , Filio Billia MD, PhD
{"title":"The Comparative Epidemiology, Pathophysiology and Management of Cardiogenic Shock Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction and Advanced Heart Failure","authors":"Varinder K. Randhawa MD, PhD , David A. Baran MD , Manreet K. Kanwar MD , Jaime A. Hernandez-Montfort MD, MPH, MSc , Shashank S. Sinha MD, MSc , Christopher F. Barnett MD, MPH , Filio Billia MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.01.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cardiogenic shock (CS) results from low cardiac output caused by myocardial dysfunction, coupled with systemic end-organ tissue hypoperfusion and elevated ventricular filling pressures, along a spectrum of shock severity. This narrative review aims to compare the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and contemporary management of 2 common etiologies of CS caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and advanced heart failure (HF-CS). CS complicates up to 14% of AMI and 5% of HF admissions. Rapid therapeutic intervention after prompt recognition of CS etiology is the mainstay toward improving clinical outcomes and mitigating end-organ sequelae and death. In AMI-CS, persistent hypotension often leads to subsequent hypoperfusion and congestion, and early culprit coronary artery lesion revascularization is critical. In HF-CS, congestion often precedes hypoperfusion and hypotension, and targeting the underlying nonischemic cause of myocardial dysfunction is key. Tailoring of hemodynamic strategies with vasoactive agents and temporary mechanical circulatory and end-organ support to manage the predominant ventricular failure, hemometabolic phenotypes, and shock severity associated with each etiology is discussed. Given the limited evidence-base in CS care, we also highlight potential knowledge gaps ripe for future exploration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":9555,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"41 4","pages":"Pages 573-586"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0828282X25000972","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) results from low cardiac output caused by myocardial dysfunction, coupled with systemic end-organ tissue hypoperfusion and elevated ventricular filling pressures, along a spectrum of shock severity. This narrative review aims to compare the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and contemporary management of 2 common etiologies of CS caused by acute myocardial infarction (AMI-CS) and advanced heart failure (HF-CS). CS complicates up to 14% of AMI and 5% of HF admissions. Rapid therapeutic intervention after prompt recognition of CS etiology is the mainstay toward improving clinical outcomes and mitigating end-organ sequelae and death. In AMI-CS, persistent hypotension often leads to subsequent hypoperfusion and congestion, and early culprit coronary artery lesion revascularization is critical. In HF-CS, congestion often precedes hypoperfusion and hypotension, and targeting the underlying nonischemic cause of myocardial dysfunction is key. Tailoring of hemodynamic strategies with vasoactive agents and temporary mechanical circulatory and end-organ support to manage the predominant ventricular failure, hemometabolic phenotypes, and shock severity associated with each etiology is discussed. Given the limited evidence-base in CS care, we also highlight potential knowledge gaps ripe for future exploration.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Cardiology (CJC) is the official journal of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS). The CJC is a vehicle for the international dissemination of new knowledge in cardiology and cardiovascular science, particularly serving as the major venue for Canadian cardiovascular medicine.