Surgical outcomes of Adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with Mohs Micrographic Surgery and excision: a systematic review

IF 1.8 4区医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY

Archives of Dermatological Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s00403-025-03842-7

Neha Arora, Ashley Wittmer, Mojahed Mohammad K. Shalabi, Frank Jing, Umer Nadir, Benjamin F. Kelley, Stanislav N. Tolkachjov

{"title":"Surgical outcomes of Adenoid cystic carcinoma treated with Mohs Micrographic Surgery and excision: a systematic review","authors":"Neha Arora, Ashley Wittmer, Mojahed Mohammad K. Shalabi, Frank Jing, Umer Nadir, Benjamin F. Kelley, Stanislav N. Tolkachjov","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-03842-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer that most commonly occurs in the salivary glands, making up approximately 2–4% of all head and neck malignancies. Treatment for ACC varies, with combinations of surgical excision, adjuvant radiotherapy, and chemotherapy reported in the literature. In this study, we aim to assess ACC recurrence rates with Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) treatment compared to traditional wide local excision (WLE). In June of 2024, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed using the following keywords: “Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma” and/or “Mohs Micrographic Surgery” and/or “MMS” and/or “excision.” Between the two databases, 25 articles were identified which included a total of 30 patients. Among all the articles, 30 procedures were documented — 8 MMS and 22 WLE. Patients with ACC treated with WLE had a higher rate of recurrence (40.9%) compared to those treated with MMS (12.5%). Limitations include a small number of tumors treated and reporting bias. MMS for the treatment of ACC demonstrated a decreased recurrence rate compared to WLE. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the benefit of MMS over WLE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-03842-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) is a rare cancer that most commonly occurs in the salivary glands, making up approximately 2–4% of all head and neck malignancies. Treatment for ACC varies, with combinations of surgical excision, adjuvant radiotherapy, and chemotherapy reported in the literature. In this study, we aim to assess ACC recurrence rates with Mohs Micrographic Surgery (MMS) treatment compared to traditional wide local excision (WLE). In June of 2024, a comprehensive review of the literature was performed using the following keywords: “Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma” and/or “Mohs Micrographic Surgery” and/or “MMS” and/or “excision.” Between the two databases, 25 articles were identified which included a total of 30 patients. Among all the articles, 30 procedures were documented — 8 MMS and 22 WLE. Patients with ACC treated with WLE had a higher rate of recurrence (40.9%) compared to those treated with MMS (12.5%). Limitations include a small number of tumors treated and reporting bias. MMS for the treatment of ACC demonstrated a decreased recurrence rate compared to WLE. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm the benefit of MMS over WLE.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archives of Dermatological Research 医学-皮肤病学

CiteScore

4.10

自引率

3.30%

发文量

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.