GenomicSEM Modelling of Diverse Executive Function GWAS Improves Gene Discovery.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Behavior Genetics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1007/s10519-025-10214-4
Lucas C Perry, Nicolas Chevalier, Michelle Luciano
{"title":"GenomicSEM Modelling of Diverse Executive Function GWAS Improves Gene Discovery.","authors":"Lucas C Perry, Nicolas Chevalier, Michelle Luciano","doi":"10.1007/s10519-025-10214-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has supported the use of latent variables as the gold-standard in measuring executive function. However, for logistical reasons genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of executive function have largely eschewed latent variables in favour of singular task measures. As low correlations have traditionally been found between individual executive function (EF) tests, it is unclear whether these GWAS have truly been measuring the same construct. In this study, we addressed this question by performing a factor analysis on summary statistics from eleven GWAS of EF taken from five studies, using GenomicSEM. Models demonstrated a bifactor structure consistent with previous research, with factors capturing common EF and working memory- specific variance. Furthermore, the GWAS performed on this model identified 20 new genomic risk loci for common EF and 4 for working memory reaching genome-wide significance beyond what was found in the constituent GWAS, together resulting in 29 newly mapped EF genes. These results help to clarify the underlying genetic structure of EF and support the idea that EF GWAS are capable of measuring genetic variance related to latent EF constructs even when not using factor scores. Furthermore, they demonstrate that GenomicSEM can combine GWAS with divergent and non-ideal measures of the same phenotype to improve statistical power.</p>","PeriodicalId":8715,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"71-85"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11882726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-025-10214-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has supported the use of latent variables as the gold-standard in measuring executive function. However, for logistical reasons genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of executive function have largely eschewed latent variables in favour of singular task measures. As low correlations have traditionally been found between individual executive function (EF) tests, it is unclear whether these GWAS have truly been measuring the same construct. In this study, we addressed this question by performing a factor analysis on summary statistics from eleven GWAS of EF taken from five studies, using GenomicSEM. Models demonstrated a bifactor structure consistent with previous research, with factors capturing common EF and working memory- specific variance. Furthermore, the GWAS performed on this model identified 20 new genomic risk loci for common EF and 4 for working memory reaching genome-wide significance beyond what was found in the constituent GWAS, together resulting in 29 newly mapped EF genes. These results help to clarify the underlying genetic structure of EF and support the idea that EF GWAS are capable of measuring genetic variance related to latent EF constructs even when not using factor scores. Furthermore, they demonstrate that GenomicSEM can combine GWAS with divergent and non-ideal measures of the same phenotype to improve statistical power.

不同执行功能GWAS的基因组扫描电镜模型改进基因发现。
先前的研究支持使用潜在变量作为衡量执行功能的金标准。然而,由于逻辑上的原因,执行功能的全基因组关联研究(GWAS)在很大程度上避开了潜在变量,而倾向于单一任务测量。由于传统上发现个体执行功能(EF)测试之间的相关性较低,因此尚不清楚这些GWAS是否真的测量了相同的结构。在本研究中,我们通过使用GenomicSEM对来自5项研究的11个EF GWAS的汇总统计数据进行因子分析来解决这个问题。模型显示了与先前研究一致的双因子结构,其中因子捕获了共同EF和工作记忆特异性方差。此外,在该模型上进行的GWAS鉴定出了20个普通EF的新基因组风险位点和4个工作记忆的基因组风险位点,这些位点在全基因组范围内具有重要意义,超过了GWAS的组成部分,共同产生了29个新定位的EF基因。这些结果有助于澄清EF的潜在遗传结构,并支持EF GWAS即使在不使用因子评分的情况下也能够测量与潜在EF结构相关的遗传变异的观点。此外,他们证明了GenomicSEM可以将GWAS与相同表型的不同和非理想测量相结合,以提高统计能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Genetics
Behavior Genetics 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavior Genetics - the leading journal concerned with the genetic analysis of complex traits - is published in cooperation with the Behavior Genetics Association. This timely journal disseminates the most current original research on the inheritance and evolution of behavioral characteristics in man and other species. Contributions from eminent international researchers focus on both the application of various genetic perspectives to the study of behavioral characteristics and the influence of behavioral differences on the genetic structure of populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信