Comparison of 2 point-of-care analyzers and the Eurolyser assay with an IDEXX reference laboratory method for measurement of symmetric dimethylarginine in dogs.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Christopher Halman, Natalie Courtman, Brett Stone
{"title":"Comparison of 2 point-of-care analyzers and the Eurolyser assay with an IDEXX reference laboratory method for measurement of symmetric dimethylarginine in dogs.","authors":"Christopher Halman, Natalie Courtman, Brett Stone","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.07.0204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the concordance of 2 point-of-care (POC) analyzers and 2 reference laboratories (RLs) for serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) analysis in dogs. We hypothesized that the Vcheck V200 POC, IDEXX Catalyst POC, and Eurolyser assays would have an acceptable agreement with the IDEXX RL SDMA results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study conducted between August 2019 and March 2023. Blood collected from dogs treated at a referral hospital underwent SDMA analysis by 2 POC analyzers (IDEXX Catalyst and Vcheck V200) and 2 RL methods (Eurolyser and IDEXX). Dogs with suspected or known renal disease were preferentially included later in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>75 samples were included in the final analysis. There was a difference in SDMA results obtained from Eurolyser assays but not IDEXX Catalyst POC and Vcheck V200 POC assay compared to IDEXX RL results. When applied to the International Renal Interest Society chronic kidney disease staging classification, there was almost perfect agreement between Eurolyser and Vcheck V200 POC SDMA compared to IDEXX RL SDMA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there was a strong to excellent correlation between assays, the results obtained via each assay demonstrated that there may be significant bias and analytical variation affecting the results. However, this may have minimal effect when applied clinically.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Analyzer and method-specific reference intervals should be established for SDMA analysis. There is preliminary evidence to support the use of Eurolyser and Vcheck V200 POC SDMA assays in the staging of canine chronic kidney disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.07.0204","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the concordance of 2 point-of-care (POC) analyzers and 2 reference laboratories (RLs) for serum symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) analysis in dogs. We hypothesized that the Vcheck V200 POC, IDEXX Catalyst POC, and Eurolyser assays would have an acceptable agreement with the IDEXX RL SDMA results.

Methods: This was a prospective study conducted between August 2019 and March 2023. Blood collected from dogs treated at a referral hospital underwent SDMA analysis by 2 POC analyzers (IDEXX Catalyst and Vcheck V200) and 2 RL methods (Eurolyser and IDEXX). Dogs with suspected or known renal disease were preferentially included later in the study.

Results: 75 samples were included in the final analysis. There was a difference in SDMA results obtained from Eurolyser assays but not IDEXX Catalyst POC and Vcheck V200 POC assay compared to IDEXX RL results. When applied to the International Renal Interest Society chronic kidney disease staging classification, there was almost perfect agreement between Eurolyser and Vcheck V200 POC SDMA compared to IDEXX RL SDMA.

Conclusions: While there was a strong to excellent correlation between assays, the results obtained via each assay demonstrated that there may be significant bias and analytical variation affecting the results. However, this may have minimal effect when applied clinically.

Clinical relevance: Analyzer and method-specific reference intervals should be established for SDMA analysis. There is preliminary evidence to support the use of Eurolyser and Vcheck V200 POC SDMA assays in the staging of canine chronic kidney disease.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信