Real-Time Assessment of Alcohol Reward, Stimulation, and Negative Affect in Individuals With and Without Alcohol Use Disorder and Depressive Disorders.

IF 15.1 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Andrea C King, Andrew M Fischer, John F Cursio, Nathan A Didier, Zoe Lee, Daniel J Fridberg
{"title":"Real-Time Assessment of Alcohol Reward, Stimulation, and Negative Affect in Individuals With and Without Alcohol Use Disorder and Depressive Disorders.","authors":"Andrea C King, Andrew M Fischer, John F Cursio, Nathan A Didier, Zoe Lee, Daniel J Fridberg","doi":"10.1176/appi.ajp.20240069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The allostasis theory states that, as addiction develops, alcohol is consumed to relieve negative affect rather than to produce positive effects. This study aimed to investigate the real-time subjective effects of alcohol in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and those prone to negative affect by virtue of having comorbid depressive disorder (DEP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (N=221) completed high-resolution ecological momentary assessments during 3-hour monitoring of one alcohol drinking episode and one non-alcohol drinking episode in their natural environment. Participants also completed daily mood surveys and next-day surveys. Linear mixed-effect models were used to compare drinking behavior and subjective responses (stimulation, sedation, liking, wanting, negative affect) among 120 participants with AUD (AUD+; with depression [DEP+]: N=64, without depression [DEP-]: N=56) and 101 participants without AUD (AUD-; DEP+: N=45, DEP-: N=56).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the monitoring period, participants with AUD consumed an average of 8.5 standard alcohol drinks (estimated blood alcohol concentration [eBAC]=0.115 g/dl) versus 3.7 drinks (eBAC=0.040 g/dl) for non-AUD participants. The AUD group, regardless of comorbid DEP, reported increases in stimulation and rewarding effects that persisted throughout most of the alcohol episode relative to the non-alcohol episode. To a lesser extent, alcohol relieved negative affect but this was not specific to AUD or DEP groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Contrary to the allostasis model of addiction's emphasis on negative reinforcement drinking, findings demonstrated that people with AUD prone to negative affect displayed positive alcohol reinforcement with pronounced and prolonged sensitivity to alcohol's pleasurable effects, akin to their noncomorbid counterparts. The findings provided critical testing of addiction theories in the natural environment to enhance external validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":7656,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"182 2","pages":"187-197"},"PeriodicalIF":15.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20240069","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The allostasis theory states that, as addiction develops, alcohol is consumed to relieve negative affect rather than to produce positive effects. This study aimed to investigate the real-time subjective effects of alcohol in individuals with alcohol use disorder (AUD) and those prone to negative affect by virtue of having comorbid depressive disorder (DEP).

Methods: Participants (N=221) completed high-resolution ecological momentary assessments during 3-hour monitoring of one alcohol drinking episode and one non-alcohol drinking episode in their natural environment. Participants also completed daily mood surveys and next-day surveys. Linear mixed-effect models were used to compare drinking behavior and subjective responses (stimulation, sedation, liking, wanting, negative affect) among 120 participants with AUD (AUD+; with depression [DEP+]: N=64, without depression [DEP-]: N=56) and 101 participants without AUD (AUD-; DEP+: N=45, DEP-: N=56).

Results: During the monitoring period, participants with AUD consumed an average of 8.5 standard alcohol drinks (estimated blood alcohol concentration [eBAC]=0.115 g/dl) versus 3.7 drinks (eBAC=0.040 g/dl) for non-AUD participants. The AUD group, regardless of comorbid DEP, reported increases in stimulation and rewarding effects that persisted throughout most of the alcohol episode relative to the non-alcohol episode. To a lesser extent, alcohol relieved negative affect but this was not specific to AUD or DEP groups.

Conclusions: Contrary to the allostasis model of addiction's emphasis on negative reinforcement drinking, findings demonstrated that people with AUD prone to negative affect displayed positive alcohol reinforcement with pronounced and prolonged sensitivity to alcohol's pleasurable effects, akin to their noncomorbid counterparts. The findings provided critical testing of addiction theories in the natural environment to enhance external validity.

酒精奖励、刺激和负面影响在有或没有酒精使用障碍和抑郁症个体中的实时评估
目的:适应平衡理论指出,随着成瘾的发展,酒精的摄入是为了缓解负面影响,而不是产生积极影响。本研究旨在探讨酒精使用障碍(AUD)患者和因共病抑郁症(DEP)而容易产生负面影响的患者对酒精的实时主观影响。方法:参与者(N=221)在他们的自然环境中,在3小时的监测中完成了一次饮酒和一次非饮酒的高分辨率生态瞬间评估。参与者还完成了每日情绪调查和第二天的调查。采用线性混合效应模型比较120名AUD (AUD+;有抑郁症[DEP+]: N=64,无抑郁症[DEP-]: N=56)和101名无AUD的参与者(AUD-;Dep +: n =45, Dep -: n =56)。结果:在监测期间,AUD参与者平均饮用8.5杯标准酒精饮料(估计血液酒精浓度[eBAC]=0.115 g/dl),而非AUD参与者平均饮用3.7杯(eBAC=0.040 g/dl)。与非酒精发作相比,AUD组在酒精发作期间的刺激和奖励效应持续增加,而不考虑DEP的合并症。在较小程度上,酒精缓解了负面影响,但这并不局限于AUD或DEP组。结论:与成瘾强调负强化饮酒的适应平衡模型相反,研究结果表明,倾向于负面影响的AUD患者表现出积极的酒精强化,对酒精的愉悦效果具有明显和持久的敏感性,类似于非共病患者。这些发现为自然环境下的成瘾理论提供了关键的测试,以提高外部有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Psychiatry
American Journal of Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
22.30
自引率
2.80%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Psychiatry, dedicated to keeping psychiatry vibrant and relevant, publishes the latest advances in the diagnosis and treatment of mental illness. The journal covers the full spectrum of issues related to mental health diagnoses and treatment, presenting original articles on new developments in diagnosis, treatment, neuroscience, and patient populations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信