The influence of distributional fairness concern on quality co-creation mobile application supply chain: Exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining mechanisms
{"title":"The influence of distributional fairness concern on quality co-creation mobile application supply chain: Exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining mechanisms","authors":"Lulu Xia , Kai Li , Yu Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.103966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines the quality co-creation practice in the mobile application supply chain composed of a mobile application developer and a mobile application distributor within a revenue-sharing framework. We analyze whether the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities and the endogeneity or exogeneity of revenue-retaining ratio exert great influence on supply chain decisions and performance. Through analysis, we obtain following results. Firstly, the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities drops down service price in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining ratio contexts. Secondly, the developer’s emphasis on profit distribution fairness reduces service quality in the exogenous revenue-retaining context but enhances it in the endogenous revenue-retaining model. Thirdly, the developer achieves profit increment when he is the only one demonstrating distributional fairness concern but the distributor’s earnings shrink in his own distributional fairness concern situation. Finally, we derive in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining contexts, the supply chain entities may simultaneously incorporate distributional fairness concern into internal decision making standards and fall into the prisoner’s dilemma. Additionally, we further explore three extended models: sequential strategic decision-making, considering the choice between exogenous and endogenous contracts, and bargaining over revenue-retaining ratio. Our findings demonstrate that, across all three extended models, supply chain entities may still fall into the prisoner’s dilemma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 103966"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525000079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research examines the quality co-creation practice in the mobile application supply chain composed of a mobile application developer and a mobile application distributor within a revenue-sharing framework. We analyze whether the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities and the endogeneity or exogeneity of revenue-retaining ratio exert great influence on supply chain decisions and performance. Through analysis, we obtain following results. Firstly, the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities drops down service price in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining ratio contexts. Secondly, the developer’s emphasis on profit distribution fairness reduces service quality in the exogenous revenue-retaining context but enhances it in the endogenous revenue-retaining model. Thirdly, the developer achieves profit increment when he is the only one demonstrating distributional fairness concern but the distributor’s earnings shrink in his own distributional fairness concern situation. Finally, we derive in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining contexts, the supply chain entities may simultaneously incorporate distributional fairness concern into internal decision making standards and fall into the prisoner’s dilemma. Additionally, we further explore three extended models: sequential strategic decision-making, considering the choice between exogenous and endogenous contracts, and bargaining over revenue-retaining ratio. Our findings demonstrate that, across all three extended models, supply chain entities may still fall into the prisoner’s dilemma.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management.
Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.