Environmental and economic optimization of the pressure-swing distillation process for separation of azeotropic mixture of Acetonitrile-Water

IF 8.1 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL
G.W. Farias Neto, K.D. Brito, R.P. Brito, W.B. Ramos
{"title":"Environmental and economic optimization of the pressure-swing distillation process for separation of azeotropic mixture of Acetonitrile-Water","authors":"G.W. Farias Neto, K.D. Brito, R.P. Brito, W.B. Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The separation of azeotropic mixtures is a significant challenge in chemical engineering, particularly when using pressure-swing distillation. This study focuses on the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for the separation of the azeotropic mixture Acetonitrile-Water, using global optimization via simulated annealing, assessing both economic (Total Annual Cost) and environmental impacts (carbon dioxide emission and Eco-indicator 99). The results aim to guide decision-making by highlighting the trade-offs in electrifying the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for Acetonitrile-Water. Heat integration between the low-pressure column reboiler and high-pressure column condenser results in substantial cost and environmental improvements, reducing Total Annual Cost by 23.53 %, Total Operating Cost by 42.2 %, and carbon dioxide emissions by 42.2 %. Additionally, the Eco-indicator 99 drops from 171,977 to 99,343 points/year. Electrifying steam generation further reduces carbon dioxide emissions from 91.97 to 72.29 kg/h but increases Total Operating Cost by 39.72 k$/year, making it economically unfeasible under the present conditions. Vapor recompression reduces Eco-indicator 99 by 72.39 % and carbon dioxide emissions by 75.18 % compared to heat integration, but its higher costs make it viable only with a payback period of over 5 years. The shift from fossil fuels to electricity also alters the primary environmental impact, highlighting the need for renewable energy sources to fully optimize the process environmentally.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131888","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The separation of azeotropic mixtures is a significant challenge in chemical engineering, particularly when using pressure-swing distillation. This study focuses on the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for the separation of the azeotropic mixture Acetonitrile-Water, using global optimization via simulated annealing, assessing both economic (Total Annual Cost) and environmental impacts (carbon dioxide emission and Eco-indicator 99). The results aim to guide decision-making by highlighting the trade-offs in electrifying the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for Acetonitrile-Water. Heat integration between the low-pressure column reboiler and high-pressure column condenser results in substantial cost and environmental improvements, reducing Total Annual Cost by 23.53 %, Total Operating Cost by 42.2 %, and carbon dioxide emissions by 42.2 %. Additionally, the Eco-indicator 99 drops from 171,977 to 99,343 points/year. Electrifying steam generation further reduces carbon dioxide emissions from 91.97 to 72.29 kg/h but increases Total Operating Cost by 39.72 k$/year, making it economically unfeasible under the present conditions. Vapor recompression reduces Eco-indicator 99 by 72.39 % and carbon dioxide emissions by 75.18 % compared to heat integration, but its higher costs make it viable only with a payback period of over 5 years. The shift from fossil fuels to electricity also alters the primary environmental impact, highlighting the need for renewable energy sources to fully optimize the process environmentally.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Separation and Purification Technology
Separation and Purification Technology 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
12.80%
发文量
2347
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信