{"title":"Environmental and economic optimization of the pressure-swing distillation process for separation of azeotropic mixture of Acetonitrile-Water","authors":"G.W. Farias Neto, K.D. Brito, R.P. Brito, W.B. Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131888","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The separation of azeotropic mixtures is a significant challenge in chemical engineering, particularly when using pressure-swing distillation. This study focuses on the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for the separation of the azeotropic mixture Acetonitrile-Water, using global optimization via simulated annealing, assessing both economic (Total Annual Cost) and environmental impacts (carbon dioxide emission and Eco-indicator 99). The results aim to guide decision-making by highlighting the trade-offs in electrifying the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for Acetonitrile-Water. Heat integration between the low-pressure column reboiler and high-pressure column condenser results in substantial cost and environmental improvements, reducing Total Annual Cost by 23.53 %, Total Operating Cost by 42.2 %, and carbon dioxide emissions by 42.2 %. Additionally, the Eco-indicator 99 drops from 171,977 to 99,343 points/year. Electrifying steam generation further reduces carbon dioxide emissions from 91.97 to 72.29 kg/h but increases Total Operating Cost by 39.72 k$/year, making it economically unfeasible under the present conditions. Vapor recompression reduces Eco-indicator 99 by 72.39 % and carbon dioxide emissions by 75.18 % compared to heat integration, but its higher costs make it viable only with a payback period of over 5 years. The shift from fossil fuels to electricity also alters the primary environmental impact, highlighting the need for renewable energy sources to fully optimize the process environmentally.","PeriodicalId":427,"journal":{"name":"Separation and Purification Technology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Separation and Purification Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2025.131888","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The separation of azeotropic mixtures is a significant challenge in chemical engineering, particularly when using pressure-swing distillation. This study focuses on the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for the separation of the azeotropic mixture Acetonitrile-Water, using global optimization via simulated annealing, assessing both economic (Total Annual Cost) and environmental impacts (carbon dioxide emission and Eco-indicator 99). The results aim to guide decision-making by highlighting the trade-offs in electrifying the Pressure-Swing Distillation process for Acetonitrile-Water. Heat integration between the low-pressure column reboiler and high-pressure column condenser results in substantial cost and environmental improvements, reducing Total Annual Cost by 23.53 %, Total Operating Cost by 42.2 %, and carbon dioxide emissions by 42.2 %. Additionally, the Eco-indicator 99 drops from 171,977 to 99,343 points/year. Electrifying steam generation further reduces carbon dioxide emissions from 91.97 to 72.29 kg/h but increases Total Operating Cost by 39.72 k$/year, making it economically unfeasible under the present conditions. Vapor recompression reduces Eco-indicator 99 by 72.39 % and carbon dioxide emissions by 75.18 % compared to heat integration, but its higher costs make it viable only with a payback period of over 5 years. The shift from fossil fuels to electricity also alters the primary environmental impact, highlighting the need for renewable energy sources to fully optimize the process environmentally.
期刊介绍:
Separation and Purification Technology is a premier journal committed to sharing innovative methods for separation and purification in chemical and environmental engineering, encompassing both homogeneous solutions and heterogeneous mixtures. Our scope includes the separation and/or purification of liquids, vapors, and gases, as well as carbon capture and separation techniques. However, it's important to note that methods solely intended for analytical purposes are not within the scope of the journal. Additionally, disciplines such as soil science, polymer science, and metallurgy fall outside the purview of Separation and Purification Technology. Join us in advancing the field of separation and purification methods for sustainable solutions in chemical and environmental engineering.