Short‐term prescribed fire frequency manipulation alters community response to subsequent fires in a southeastern pine savanna

IF 5.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Anita Simha, Justin P. Wright
{"title":"Short‐term prescribed fire frequency manipulation alters community response to subsequent fires in a southeastern pine savanna","authors":"Anita Simha, Justin P. Wright","doi":"10.1111/1365-2745.14492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:list> <jats:list-item>Disturbances can have enduring impacts on ecological communities due to ‘legacy effects’, which result in community structure that varies with the history of recent disturbance. Further, such legacy effects can influence community—and population‐level responses to future disturbance.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>We leveraged a landscape‐scale fire frequency experiment in a longleaf pine savanna to assess legacy effects in understory community richness, structure, and in community response to subsequent fire. Further, we investigated species‐level responses to fire based on their burn history and attempted to explain these responses using relevant functional traits.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Fire suppression for just 4 years resulted in more woody‐dominated communities. Fire suppression also resulted in more overall plant abundance. This buildup of plant material is consistent with our further finding that a greater interval between fires resulted in greater loss of cover with the next fire.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Greater fire return interval led to more vegetative cover loss immediately post‐fire, but this effect attenuated within a year of recovery time. Lowland shrub‐dominated communities also experienced greater cover loss due to fire. There was no effect of fire return interval on change in species richness.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Woody species responded more negatively to fire than herbaceous species. Intraspecific variation in specific leaf area increased resistance to fire only for shorter species, and it decreased resistance for taller species. Only some of the abundant species showed a sensitivity to fire history.</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>. Overall, our findings provide evidence that short‐term changes to disturbance regimes can create alternative responses to future disturbance at the community and species level. This work suggests that short‐term pauses to longer term burn regimes can facilitate woody encroachment and have lasting impacts through altered community responses to future fires.</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":191,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.14492","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disturbances can have enduring impacts on ecological communities due to ‘legacy effects’, which result in community structure that varies with the history of recent disturbance. Further, such legacy effects can influence community—and population‐level responses to future disturbance. We leveraged a landscape‐scale fire frequency experiment in a longleaf pine savanna to assess legacy effects in understory community richness, structure, and in community response to subsequent fire. Further, we investigated species‐level responses to fire based on their burn history and attempted to explain these responses using relevant functional traits. Fire suppression for just 4 years resulted in more woody‐dominated communities. Fire suppression also resulted in more overall plant abundance. This buildup of plant material is consistent with our further finding that a greater interval between fires resulted in greater loss of cover with the next fire. Greater fire return interval led to more vegetative cover loss immediately post‐fire, but this effect attenuated within a year of recovery time. Lowland shrub‐dominated communities also experienced greater cover loss due to fire. There was no effect of fire return interval on change in species richness. Woody species responded more negatively to fire than herbaceous species. Intraspecific variation in specific leaf area increased resistance to fire only for shorter species, and it decreased resistance for taller species. Only some of the abundant species showed a sensitivity to fire history. Synthesis. Overall, our findings provide evidence that short‐term changes to disturbance regimes can create alternative responses to future disturbance at the community and species level. This work suggests that short‐term pauses to longer term burn regimes can facilitate woody encroachment and have lasting impacts through altered community responses to future fires.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Ecology
Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.50%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Ecology publishes original research papers on all aspects of the ecology of plants (including algae), in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. We do not publish papers concerned solely with cultivated plants and agricultural ecosystems. Studies of plant communities, populations or individual species are accepted, as well as studies of the interactions between plants and animals, fungi or bacteria, providing they focus on the ecology of the plants. We aim to bring important work using any ecological approach (including molecular techniques) to a wide international audience and therefore only publish papers with strong and ecological messages that advance our understanding of ecological principles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信