2870 Improving multidisciplinary team meetings on an elderly medicine Ward at Leeds teaching hospitals trust

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
E Brew, A Cracknell, A Flinders, S Ninan
{"title":"2870 Improving multidisciplinary team meetings on an elderly medicine Ward at Leeds teaching hospitals trust","authors":"E Brew, A Cracknell, A Flinders, S Ninan","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae277.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Within our ward multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings we noted that there was often a lack of attendance from key disciplines, inconsistent content, and an overly medical emphasis. We wished to create an MDT that was structured, with consistent input from nursing and therapy teams, covering components of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Methods On one pilot ward, we agreed a new structure to MDT meetings. Clinical leadership was required to facilitate staff sharing their observations, with clinicians speaking less. We used an A0 poster as a clear visual prompt for maintaining structure. A survey on teamworking and safety was performed on the pilot ward by the Improvement Academy. We had several iterations, but a standardised structure with key ingredients for MDTs was rolled out across five other Elderly Medicine wards. A further survey was performed examining opinions on quality of MDT working. Results After our interventions, CFS, 4AT and mobility went from being discussed 0% of the time in July 2021 to 100% of the time on the pilot ward between January and July 2024. Mobility went from being discussed from 0% in July 2021 to 71% in May 2024 across all wards. 90.5% of the pilot team thought that decision making utilised input from relevant team members. In a further survey in May 2024, 82.6% agreed that the relevant team members opinions were listened to. Conclusion A structured MDT process was successful in incorporating key elements of CGA whilst improving MDT teamworking. Starting with a single ward allowed others to gain confidence in the success of the process and enable natural spread. Key stakeholders including organisational leads were consulted and involved in improvement work, such that this is now a standard way of working. The lessons learned are being used to contribute to a digital dashboard tracking MDT progress.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae277.024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Within our ward multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings we noted that there was often a lack of attendance from key disciplines, inconsistent content, and an overly medical emphasis. We wished to create an MDT that was structured, with consistent input from nursing and therapy teams, covering components of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). Methods On one pilot ward, we agreed a new structure to MDT meetings. Clinical leadership was required to facilitate staff sharing their observations, with clinicians speaking less. We used an A0 poster as a clear visual prompt for maintaining structure. A survey on teamworking and safety was performed on the pilot ward by the Improvement Academy. We had several iterations, but a standardised structure with key ingredients for MDTs was rolled out across five other Elderly Medicine wards. A further survey was performed examining opinions on quality of MDT working. Results After our interventions, CFS, 4AT and mobility went from being discussed 0% of the time in July 2021 to 100% of the time on the pilot ward between January and July 2024. Mobility went from being discussed from 0% in July 2021 to 71% in May 2024 across all wards. 90.5% of the pilot team thought that decision making utilised input from relevant team members. In a further survey in May 2024, 82.6% agreed that the relevant team members opinions were listened to. Conclusion A structured MDT process was successful in incorporating key elements of CGA whilst improving MDT teamworking. Starting with a single ward allowed others to gain confidence in the success of the process and enable natural spread. Key stakeholders including organisational leads were consulted and involved in improvement work, such that this is now a standard way of working. The lessons learned are being used to contribute to a digital dashboard tracking MDT progress.
2870改进利兹教学医院老年医学病房的多学科团队会议
在我们的病房多学科小组(MDT)会议中,我们注意到经常缺乏关键学科的出席,内容不一致,以及过度强调医学。我们希望创建一个结构化的MDT,与护理和治疗团队的一致输入,涵盖综合老年评估(CGA)的组成部分。方法在一个试点病房,我们同意了MDT会议的新结构。需要临床领导来促进工作人员分享他们的观察结果,临床医生说话较少。我们使用了一张A0海报作为保持结构的清晰视觉提示。改进学院在试点病房进行了一项关于团队合作和安全的调查。我们进行了几次迭代,但在其他五个老年医学病房推出了包含mdt关键成分的标准化结构。对MDT工作质量的意见进行了进一步的调查。结果经过我们的干预,CFS、4AT和流动性在试点病房的讨论率从2021年7月的0%上升到2024年1月至7月的100%。所有病房的流动性从2021年7月的0%上升到2024年5月的71%。90.5%的试点团队认为决策利用了相关团队成员的意见。在2024年5月的进一步调查中,82.6%的人同意听取了相关团队成员的意见。结论一个结构化的MDT过程能够成功地结合CGA的关键要素,同时改善MDT团队合作。从单个病房开始,使其他人对该过程的成功获得信心,并使其能够自然传播。包括组织领导在内的关键利益相关者被咨询并参与改进工作,因此这现在是一种标准的工作方式。所吸取的经验教训正在用于建立跟踪MDT进展的数字仪表板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信