Performance of flipped classroom teaching method during hemodialysis training of nurses.

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2025-01-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0276en
Zihua Lu, Jiangtao Zhu, Cheng Chen
{"title":"Performance of flipped classroom teaching method during hemodialysis training of nurses.","authors":"Zihua Lu, Jiangtao Zhu, Cheng Chen","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0276en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the effectiveness of flipped classroom (FC) model with traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model in the education of hemodialysis nurses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Enrolled were 46 nurses who had received training from the hemodialysis center. These nurses were randomly assigned to FC or LBL groups, with 23 nurses in each group. FC group received the FC method, while LBL group was trained via the traditional LBL. After training, all nurses were examined for their theoretical knowledge, clinical practice skills and self-learning abilities. Furthermore, their satisfaction with the teaching mode was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>FC group outperformed LBL group in the mastery of theoretical knowledge. In FC group, the scores in objective, subjective and overall questions were significantly higher than those in LBL group. FC group demonstrated a superior capability in clinical practices. FC group exhibited a superior performance over the LBL group in self-learning ability. Additionally, FC group showed a higher degree of satisfaction with the training method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FC method benefits nurses in mastering knowledge about hemodialysis. It enhances their clinical practice skills and self-learning capabilities, and brings them with a higher degree of satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"58 ","pages":"e20240276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11801669/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2024-0276en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of flipped classroom (FC) model with traditional lecture-based learning (LBL) model in the education of hemodialysis nurses.

Method: Enrolled were 46 nurses who had received training from the hemodialysis center. These nurses were randomly assigned to FC or LBL groups, with 23 nurses in each group. FC group received the FC method, while LBL group was trained via the traditional LBL. After training, all nurses were examined for their theoretical knowledge, clinical practice skills and self-learning abilities. Furthermore, their satisfaction with the teaching mode was evaluated.

Results: FC group outperformed LBL group in the mastery of theoretical knowledge. In FC group, the scores in objective, subjective and overall questions were significantly higher than those in LBL group. FC group demonstrated a superior capability in clinical practices. FC group exhibited a superior performance over the LBL group in self-learning ability. Additionally, FC group showed a higher degree of satisfaction with the training method.

Conclusion: FC method benefits nurses in mastering knowledge about hemodialysis. It enhances their clinical practice skills and self-learning capabilities, and brings them with a higher degree of satisfaction.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信