Patterns of reflux in patients with CEAP C2 disease compared to patients with C6 venous ulceration.

Neel Gadhoke, Zoe Deol, Richard Kennedy, Sanjiv Lakhanpal, Peter J Pappas
{"title":"Patterns of reflux in patients with CEAP C2 disease compared to patients with C6 venous ulceration.","authors":"Neel Gadhoke, Zoe Deol, Richard Kennedy, Sanjiv Lakhanpal, Peter J Pappas","doi":"10.1177/02683555251317852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>CEAP categorizes patients based on disease progression and severity. Whether disease severity is associated with specific patterns of reflux is currently unknown. We hypothesize that patterns of reflux in patients with C2 and C5/6 disease will differ.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Multi-center retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2015 to December 2020, we performed a retrospective review of reflux patterns in 21 335 patients and 31 727 limbs in symptomatic patients with C2 or C5/6 disease. Patterns of reflux in Great (GSV), Small (SSV), Deep and Perforators (Perf), were analyzed in patients with and without junctional reflux. The GSV and SSV were divided into six and three segments respectively. The number of perforators with reflux were categorized as 1-3 above and below-knee and deep system reflux was divided into three segments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 21 335 patients the average age and female/male distribution was the following: C2 (54.13 ± 13.82, 21 410/5047), C5/6 (64.75 ± 14.75, 1514/1755) (<i>p</i> ≤ .001). When SFJ reflux is present, 6-segment GSV reflux was most prevalent (C2, 14.85% vs C5/6, 27.50). Without junctional reflux, above knee reflux was more common in C2 disease, while below knee reflux was more common in C5/6 disease (<i>p</i> ≤ .01). Three segment SSV reflux was more prevalent in C2 patients (26.67% vs 16.27%, <i>p</i> ≤ .001). Below knee perforator reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (79.56% vs 73.53%, <i>p</i> ≤ .01). Combined CFV/FV/POPV reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (38.5% vs 20.5%, <i>p</i> ≤ .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The presence of junctional reflux is more closely associated with disease location (above- vs below-knee) than with disease classification. SFJ reflux is more likely to present with extensive above knee disease. Isolated below-knee reflux is more significantly associated with C5/6 disease, independent of junctional reflux. Conversely, isolated above-knee superficial reflux is significantly associated with C2 disease and junctional reflux.</p>","PeriodicalId":94350,"journal":{"name":"Phlebology","volume":" ","pages":"2683555251317852"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phlebology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555251317852","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: CEAP categorizes patients based on disease progression and severity. Whether disease severity is associated with specific patterns of reflux is currently unknown. We hypothesize that patterns of reflux in patients with C2 and C5/6 disease will differ.

Design: Multi-center retrospective cohort analysis.

Methods: From January 2015 to December 2020, we performed a retrospective review of reflux patterns in 21 335 patients and 31 727 limbs in symptomatic patients with C2 or C5/6 disease. Patterns of reflux in Great (GSV), Small (SSV), Deep and Perforators (Perf), were analyzed in patients with and without junctional reflux. The GSV and SSV were divided into six and three segments respectively. The number of perforators with reflux were categorized as 1-3 above and below-knee and deep system reflux was divided into three segments.

Results: Of the 21 335 patients the average age and female/male distribution was the following: C2 (54.13 ± 13.82, 21 410/5047), C5/6 (64.75 ± 14.75, 1514/1755) (p ≤ .001). When SFJ reflux is present, 6-segment GSV reflux was most prevalent (C2, 14.85% vs C5/6, 27.50). Without junctional reflux, above knee reflux was more common in C2 disease, while below knee reflux was more common in C5/6 disease (p ≤ .01). Three segment SSV reflux was more prevalent in C2 patients (26.67% vs 16.27%, p ≤ .001). Below knee perforator reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (79.56% vs 73.53%, p ≤ .01). Combined CFV/FV/POPV reflux was more prevalent in C5/6 patients (38.5% vs 20.5%, p ≤ .001).

Conclusion: The presence of junctional reflux is more closely associated with disease location (above- vs below-knee) than with disease classification. SFJ reflux is more likely to present with extensive above knee disease. Isolated below-knee reflux is more significantly associated with C5/6 disease, independent of junctional reflux. Conversely, isolated above-knee superficial reflux is significantly associated with C2 disease and junctional reflux.

与C6静脉溃疡患者相比,CEAP C2患者的反流模式
目的:CEAP根据疾病进展和严重程度对患者进行分类。目前尚不清楚疾病严重程度是否与特定的反流模式相关。我们假设C2和C5/6疾病患者的反流模式会有所不同。设计:多中心回顾性队列分析。方法:从2015年1月至2020年12月,我们对21335例患者和31727例有症状的C2或C5/6疾病患者的反流模式进行了回顾性分析。分析了大(GSV),小(SSV),深(Perf)和穿孔(Perf)的反流模式在有和没有结膜反流的患者中。GSV和SSV分别分为6段和3段。出现反流的穿支数分为1-3个膝关节上下,深层系统反流分为3段。结果:21 335例患者的平均年龄和男女分布如下:C2(54.13±13.82,21 410/5047),C5/6(64.75±14.75,1514/1755)(p≤0.001)。当存在SFJ反流时,6段GSV反流最为普遍(C2, 14.85% vs c5 / 6,27.50%)。无关节反流时,C2病变以膝上反流多见,而C5/6病变以膝下反流多见(p≤0.01)。三段SSV反流在C2患者中更为普遍(26.67% vs 16.27%, p≤0.001)。膝关节下穿支反流在C5/6患者中更为普遍(79.56% vs 73.53%, p≤0.01)。CFV/FV/POPV联合反流在C5/6患者中更为普遍(38.5% vs 20.5%, p≤0.001)。结论:结膜反流的存在与疾病部位(膝上或膝下)的关系比与疾病分类的关系更密切。SFJ反流更可能出现广泛的膝关节以上疾病。孤立性膝下反流与C5/6疾病的相关性更显著,与结膜反流无关。相反,孤立的膝上浅反流与C2疾病和结膜反流显著相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信