Vaccines and AMR: An analysis of the funding landscape for human bacterial vaccines in low-and middle-income countries

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Catherine Fleck-Vidal , Anna Doubell , Christiane Gerke , Usha Lamichhane , Lesley Ogilvie , Ralf Sudbrak , Jerome H. Kim , T. Anh Wartel , Laura Plant
{"title":"Vaccines and AMR: An analysis of the funding landscape for human bacterial vaccines in low-and middle-income countries","authors":"Catherine Fleck-Vidal ,&nbsp;Anna Doubell ,&nbsp;Christiane Gerke ,&nbsp;Usha Lamichhane ,&nbsp;Lesley Ogilvie ,&nbsp;Ralf Sudbrak ,&nbsp;Jerome H. Kim ,&nbsp;T. Anh Wartel ,&nbsp;Laura Plant","doi":"10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.126771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vaccines are critical tools to prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through prevention of infection and reduction of subsequent antibiotic use. Since AMR is a critical issue disproportionately affecting Low- and Middle- Income Countries (LMICs), we examined investments in research and development for bacterial vaccines with a focus on LMIC-driven research.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Publicly available funding data on projects active from January 2007 to 15 January 2024 from the G-FINDER and Global AMR R&amp;D Hub databases were analysed. The investment into human bacterial vaccine R&amp;D was analysed to identify the recipients and geographic distribution of funding provided directly from funders and through intermediary organisations.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Global funding of vaccine R&amp;D for bacterial pathogens in this dataset totals 4.50 billion USD, with the majority of funding directed towards <em>M. tuberculosis</em> and <em>S. pneumoniae.</em> Most funding was received by organisations in North America and Europe, with Asia, Africa, and Central/South America collectively receiving less than 20 % of the total funding. Philanthropic and intermediary organisations, particularly Product Development Partnerships (PDPs), emerge as critical players in mobilising and coordinating resources for bacterial vaccine R&amp;D in LMICs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Comprehensive and transparent reporting is needed to accurately assess funding to LMICs. Nevertheless, the current analysis shows that PDPs and intermediary funders are pivotal in ensuring investments reach LMIC product developers. Data gaps remain for critical bacterial pathogens on WHO's AMR priority pathogen list.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23491,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 126771"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X25000684","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vaccines are critical tools to prevent the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) through prevention of infection and reduction of subsequent antibiotic use. Since AMR is a critical issue disproportionately affecting Low- and Middle- Income Countries (LMICs), we examined investments in research and development for bacterial vaccines with a focus on LMIC-driven research.

Methods

Publicly available funding data on projects active from January 2007 to 15 January 2024 from the G-FINDER and Global AMR R&D Hub databases were analysed. The investment into human bacterial vaccine R&D was analysed to identify the recipients and geographic distribution of funding provided directly from funders and through intermediary organisations.

Findings

Global funding of vaccine R&D for bacterial pathogens in this dataset totals 4.50 billion USD, with the majority of funding directed towards M. tuberculosis and S. pneumoniae. Most funding was received by organisations in North America and Europe, with Asia, Africa, and Central/South America collectively receiving less than 20 % of the total funding. Philanthropic and intermediary organisations, particularly Product Development Partnerships (PDPs), emerge as critical players in mobilising and coordinating resources for bacterial vaccine R&D in LMICs.

Conclusion

Comprehensive and transparent reporting is needed to accurately assess funding to LMICs. Nevertheless, the current analysis shows that PDPs and intermediary funders are pivotal in ensuring investments reach LMIC product developers. Data gaps remain for critical bacterial pathogens on WHO's AMR priority pathogen list.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine
Vaccine 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
5.50%
发文量
992
审稿时长
131 days
期刊介绍: Vaccine is unique in publishing the highest quality science across all disciplines relevant to the field of vaccinology - all original article submissions across basic and clinical research, vaccine manufacturing, history, public policy, behavioral science and ethics, social sciences, safety, and many other related areas are welcomed. The submission categories as given in the Guide for Authors indicate where we receive the most papers. Papers outside these major areas are also welcome and authors are encouraged to contact us with specific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信