Dying in a Homophobic Nation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities, Advance Care Planning and Surrogate Decision-Making Challenges for Sexual and Gender Minority Older Adults at End-of-Life.

Heather Menzer
{"title":"Dying in a Homophobic Nation: Addressing Healthcare Disparities, Advance Care Planning and Surrogate Decision-Making Challenges for Sexual and Gender Minority Older Adults at End-of-Life.","authors":"Heather Menzer","doi":"10.1177/10499091251317724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Promoting autonomy in medical decision-making is an essential part of palliative care. Therefore, palliative care providers should prioritize supporting the autonomy of sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, a community that has historically suffered from healthcare disparities. This support is particularly significant when an illness or injury renders a patient unable to make medical decisions, necessitating the designation of a surrogate decision-maker. Surrogate decision-maker policies vary by state and largely do not represent patients whose support systems are outside of the biological family. This article reviews healthcare disparities experienced by SGM older adults, including higher rates of certain health conditions and barriers to accessing care due to stigma and discrimination. It also highlights the compounded challenges faced by SGM individuals who are part of racial and ethnic minority groups. The lack of inclusive surrogate decision-making policies exacerbates these disparities, as many SGM older adults do not have legally recognized partners or children to act as decision-makers. The absence of inclusive policies for surrogate decision-making results in distress for patients, families, loved ones, and medical providers. This article discusses the importance of advance care planning and completion of advance directives for this population to ensure patient wishes are respected. Palliative providers need to advocate for surrogate decision-maker policies that are more inclusive of families of choice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251317724"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251317724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Promoting autonomy in medical decision-making is an essential part of palliative care. Therefore, palliative care providers should prioritize supporting the autonomy of sexual and gender minority (SGM) older adults, a community that has historically suffered from healthcare disparities. This support is particularly significant when an illness or injury renders a patient unable to make medical decisions, necessitating the designation of a surrogate decision-maker. Surrogate decision-maker policies vary by state and largely do not represent patients whose support systems are outside of the biological family. This article reviews healthcare disparities experienced by SGM older adults, including higher rates of certain health conditions and barriers to accessing care due to stigma and discrimination. It also highlights the compounded challenges faced by SGM individuals who are part of racial and ethnic minority groups. The lack of inclusive surrogate decision-making policies exacerbates these disparities, as many SGM older adults do not have legally recognized partners or children to act as decision-makers. The absence of inclusive policies for surrogate decision-making results in distress for patients, families, loved ones, and medical providers. This article discusses the importance of advance care planning and completion of advance directives for this population to ensure patient wishes are respected. Palliative providers need to advocate for surrogate decision-maker policies that are more inclusive of families of choice.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信