Low-dose Systemic Tissue-type-plasminogen-activator Compared to Conventional Anti-coagulation for the Treatment of Intermediate-high Risk Pulmonary Embolism.
Alan De la Rosa, Adrian Rojas Murguia, Michael J Brockman, Debabrata Mukherjee, Manu Rajachandran, Nils P Nickel
{"title":"Low-dose Systemic Tissue-type-plasminogen-activator Compared to Conventional Anti-coagulation for the Treatment of Intermediate-high Risk Pulmonary Embolism.","authors":"Alan De la Rosa, Adrian Rojas Murguia, Michael J Brockman, Debabrata Mukherjee, Manu Rajachandran, Nils P Nickel","doi":"10.2174/011871529X349173250119114056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent cause of death. Acute PE may be treated either with full anticoagulation (AC) alone or thrombolytic therapy with systemic tissue-- type-plasminogen-activator (tPA) based on risk assessment. Currently, AC is the standard of care for most patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, with low-dose tPA emerging as an effective alternative. However, studies directly comparing the efficacy and safety of low-dose tPA to AC are lacking in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of low-- dose tPA, compared to AC alone in right ventricular function and in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications in patients presenting with intermediate-high risk PE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-center, retrospective cohort trial conducted at a university hospital. A total of 148 patients were screened, and 88 patients qualified for this study. The primary endpoints were changes in right ventricular function on echocardiogram in 24 hours, in-hospital mortality, and major bleeding complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-eight consecutive patients with intermediate high-risk PE were included. Twenty- six patients (29.5%) received low-dose systemic tPA administered via intravenous infusion, and 62 patients (70.4%) received standard full-dose anticoagulation. There were no significant differences in baseline vital signs or PESI scores between the low-dose tPA and the AC group. Patients in the low-dose tPA group had worse RV function and higher troponin levels at baseline but showed significant improvement in all RV parameters assessed during the 24-hour follow-up. In comparison, there was no significant improvement in RV function in the AC group. There were more bleeding events in the AC group. LOS was shorter in the low-dose tPA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Treatment with low-dose prolonged infusion of tPA may be an effective and safe therapy in patients with intermediate-risk PE. Compared to AC, low-dose tPA was effective in decreasing PASP and restoration of RV function.</p>","PeriodicalId":93925,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular & hematological disorders drug targets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011871529X349173250119114056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent cause of death. Acute PE may be treated either with full anticoagulation (AC) alone or thrombolytic therapy with systemic tissue-- type-plasminogen-activator (tPA) based on risk assessment. Currently, AC is the standard of care for most patients with intermediate-high-risk PE, with low-dose tPA emerging as an effective alternative. However, studies directly comparing the efficacy and safety of low-dose tPA to AC are lacking in this patient population.
Objective: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of low-- dose tPA, compared to AC alone in right ventricular function and in-hospital mortality and bleeding complications in patients presenting with intermediate-high risk PE.
Methods: This is a single-center, retrospective cohort trial conducted at a university hospital. A total of 148 patients were screened, and 88 patients qualified for this study. The primary endpoints were changes in right ventricular function on echocardiogram in 24 hours, in-hospital mortality, and major bleeding complications.
Results: Eighty-eight consecutive patients with intermediate high-risk PE were included. Twenty- six patients (29.5%) received low-dose systemic tPA administered via intravenous infusion, and 62 patients (70.4%) received standard full-dose anticoagulation. There were no significant differences in baseline vital signs or PESI scores between the low-dose tPA and the AC group. Patients in the low-dose tPA group had worse RV function and higher troponin levels at baseline but showed significant improvement in all RV parameters assessed during the 24-hour follow-up. In comparison, there was no significant improvement in RV function in the AC group. There were more bleeding events in the AC group. LOS was shorter in the low-dose tPA group.
Conclusion: Treatment with low-dose prolonged infusion of tPA may be an effective and safe therapy in patients with intermediate-risk PE. Compared to AC, low-dose tPA was effective in decreasing PASP and restoration of RV function.